Neurology, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.
Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Investig Med. 2020 Dec;68(8):1379-1385. doi: 10.1136/jim-2020-001432. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
Glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) in serum has been evaluated as a promising biomarker to differentiate between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We assessed its value as diagnostic and prognostic tool for ICH through a literature systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.We performed a systematic search in PubMed database until November 2018 for publications that evaluated GFAP to differentiate AIS and ICH within 4.5 hours after symptoms onset. Thereafter, we invited authors of selected studies to participate in this work by providing IPD from their cohorts. We used standardized individual subject's data to evaluate the association of GFAP concentrations with stroke subtype, demographics, stroke characteristics and factors related with GFAP measurement.From 4 selected studies, we collected data of 340 patients (236 AIS and 104 ICH). Standardized GFAP blood levels were significantly elevated in ICH compared with those with AIS (median and IQR: 0.84 (0.781-1.24), 0.79 (0.74-0.81); p<0.0001). In both stroke types, GFAP concentrations correlated with baseline stroke severity (r=0.27, p<0.0001; r=0.36, p<0.001; for AIS and ICH, respectively) but no correlation was found regarding time to sampling. Limited data precluded the evaluation of GFAP levels and functional outcome.These findings demonstrate substantially different levels of GFAP in the blood of patients with ICH compared with patients with AIS soon after the event, while no association was found with outcome. In summary, GFAP could be a valuable diagnostic tool to assist in medical decision-making and to optimize management of stroke in the acute setting.
胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)在血清中已被评估为区分脑出血(ICH)和急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的有前途的生物标志物。我们通过文献系统评价和个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析来评估其作为 ICH 诊断和预后工具的价值。我们在 PubMed 数据库中进行了系统搜索,直到 2018 年 11 月,以评估在症状发作后 4.5 小时内用 GFAP 区分 AIS 和 ICH 的出版物。此后,我们邀请选定研究的作者通过提供他们队列的 IPD 参与这项工作。我们使用标准化的个体患者数据来评估 GFAP 浓度与卒中亚型、人口统计学特征、卒中特征和与 GFAP 测量相关的因素之间的关系。从 4 项选定的研究中,我们收集了 340 名患者(236 名 AIS 和 104 名 ICH)的数据。与 AIS 相比,ICH 患者的标准化 GFAP 血水平显著升高(中位数和 IQR:0.84(0.781-1.24),0.79(0.74-0.81);p<0.0001)。在两种卒中类型中,GFAP 浓度与基线卒中严重程度相关(r=0.27,p<0.0001;r=0.36,p<0.001;分别为 AIS 和 ICH),但与采样时间无相关性。有限的数据排除了对 GFAP 水平和功能结局的评估。这些发现表明,ICH 患者血液中的 GFAP 水平与事件发生后不久的 AIS 患者有明显不同,而与结局无相关性。总之,GFAP 可能是一种有价值的诊断工具,有助于在急性情况下辅助医疗决策并优化卒中的管理。