• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗尿路结石的真实世界比较疗效。

Real-world comparative effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of urinary stones.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urological Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):2177-2182. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03430-6. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03430-6
PMID:32909172
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify clinical and non-clinical predictors of treatment failure and perioperative complications following ureterorenoscopy versus shockwave lithotripsy.

METHODS

The New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was used to identify 226,331 patients who underwent index ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones from 2000 to 2016. Propensity-matched generalized linear-mixed modeling was utilized to compare failure and complication rates between the two procedure groups.

RESULTS

219,383 individuals meeting inclusion criteria who underwent either ureterorenoscopy (n = 124,342) or shockwave lithotripsy (n = 95,041) in New York State between 2000 and 2016 were included in our analysis. After propensity score matching, patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy were found to have decreased odds of experiencing any type of 30-day complication (P < 0.001 for all) but increased odds of treatment failure at both 90 (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.64-1.77) and 180 (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.76-1.89) days (P < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy experienced significantly higher odds of treatment failure, although this undesirable outcome appears to be partially offset by lower 30-day complication rates.

摘要

目的

确定输尿管镜检查与冲击波碎石术治疗后失败和围手术期并发症的临床和非临床预测因素。

方法

利用纽约州卫生署全州规划和研究合作系统(SPARCS)数据库,对 2000 年至 2016 年间因肾结石接受指数输尿管镜检查或冲击波碎石术的 226331 名患者进行了识别。利用倾向评分匹配广义线性混合模型比较两组手术的失败和并发症发生率。

结果

符合纳入标准的 219383 名个体(n=124342)在纽约州接受输尿管镜检查,或(n=95041)接受冲击波碎石术,包括在我们的分析中。在进行倾向评分匹配后,发现接受冲击波碎石术的患者发生任何类型的 30 天并发症的可能性降低(所有 P<0.001),但在 90 天(OR 1.70,95%CI 1.64-1.77)和 180 天(OR 1.83,95%CI 1.76-1.89)时治疗失败的可能性增加(均 P<0.001)。

结论

接受冲击波碎石术的患者发生治疗失败的可能性明显更高,尽管这种不良后果似乎部分被 30 天并发症率较低所抵消。

相似文献

1
Real-world comparative effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of urinary stones.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗尿路结石的真实世界比较疗效。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):2177-2182. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03430-6. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Prediction of shockwave failure in patients with urinary tract stones.尿路结石患者冲击波碎石失败的预测
Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Mar;16(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000193373.22318.68.
3
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜术治疗儿童上尿路结石的对比研究
J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0313.
4
Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)后对输尿管镜取石术(ureterorenoscopy)结果的影响以及 SWL 失败后治疗上段输尿管结石的最佳输尿管镜取石术时机。
World J Urol. 2020 Mar;38(3):769-774. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02809-4. Epub 2019 May 16.
5
Initial Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopy: A Re-treatment and Cost Analysis Using a Longitudinal, Population-Based Database.初次体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查:基于纵向人群数据库的再治疗及成本分析
Urol Pract. 2021 Mar;8(2):203-208. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000206. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.输尿管软镜与体外冲击波碎石术治疗 10-20mm 下极结石的比较。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.经皮肾镜取石术与钬激光碎石术治疗 2-3cm 肾结石:多中心经验。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0629.
8
Treatment alternatives for urinary system stone disease in preschool aged children: results of 616 cases.学龄前儿童泌尿系统结石病的治疗选择:616例病例的结果
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Feb;11(1):34.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.010. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
9
Treatment of lower ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or intracorporeal lithotripsy?
J Endourol. 1999 Mar;13(2):77-81. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.77.
10
Effect of vibration massage therapy after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with lower caliceal stones.体外冲击波碎石术后振动按摩疗法对下盏结石患者的影响。
J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):705-7. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.705.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Course and Risk Factors for Repeat Procedures After Ureteroscopy or Shockwave Lithotripsy.输尿管镜检查或体外冲击波碎石术后重复手术的时间过程和危险因素。
Urology. 2023 Apr;174:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.014. Epub 2022 Dec 24.