• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Time Course and Risk Factors for Repeat Procedures After Ureteroscopy or Shockwave Lithotripsy.输尿管镜检查或体外冲击波碎石术后重复手术的时间过程和危险因素。
Urology. 2023 Apr;174:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.014. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石儿童肾结石:多机构疗效和并发症的结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):516.e1-516.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.比较半刚性输尿管镜、软性输尿管镜和冲击波碎石术治疗 11-20mm 近端输尿管结石的初始治疗效果。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020 Apr 6;92(1):39-44. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2020.1.39.
4
Decreased Recurrence of Urolithiasis After Simultaneous Ureteroscopic Surgery for Ureter and Ipsilateral Renal Calculi: Comparison to Shockwave Lithotripsy for Ureter Calculi Alone.同期输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管和同侧肾结石后结石复发减少:与单独冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的比较。
Urology. 2021 Jan;147:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.041. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
6
Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石(TISU):一项多中心随机对照非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.044. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.比较冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜取石术治疗肾结石患者的效果。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jul;149(7):648-53. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.336.
8
Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.中段及下段输尿管结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术还是输尿管镜检查?一项多中心研究的结果
J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):727-33. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.727.
9
Management patterns of medicare patients undergoing treatment for upper urinary tract calculi.医保患者上尿路结石治疗的管理模式。
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):723-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0580. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
10
Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi: a prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管结石:患者报告结局的前瞻性评估。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1569-74. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0966-2. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterolithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy challenges in managing spinal cord neuropathy patients. Lessons learned from a scoping review.体外冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术和经皮肾镜碎石术在脊髓神经病患者管理中的挑战。一项范围综述的经验教训。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):89-110. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.123. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse.去除小的、无症状的肾结石与复发的发生率。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 11;387(6):506-513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204253.
2
Is Stone-free Status After Surgical Intervention for Kidney Stones Associated With Better Health-related Quality of Life? - A Multicenter Study From the North American Stone Quality of Life Consortium.经手术干预治疗肾结石后达到无结石状态是否与更好的健康相关生活质量相关?- 北美结石生活质量联盟的一项多中心研究。
Urology. 2021 Feb;148:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.058. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
3
Real-world comparative effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of urinary stones.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗尿路结石的真实世界比较疗效。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):2177-2182. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03430-6. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Kidney stone compositions and frequencies in a Norwegian population.挪威人群中的肾结石成分及发病率
Scand J Urol. 2019 Apr-Jun;53(2-3):139-144. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1606031. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Role of Residual Fragments on the Risk of Repeat Surgery after Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy: Single Center Study.软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术后残留碎片与再次手术风险的关系:单中心研究。
J Urol. 2019 Feb;201(2):358-363. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.053.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi.体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管肾镜术治疗未治疗的肾结石对比研究
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Jun;11(3):364-369. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx151. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
7
Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.输尿管镜检查治疗结石比体外冲击波碎石术更具成本效益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1783-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2320-9. Epub 2018 May 5.
8
Impact of Statin Intake on Kidney Stone Formation.他汀类药物摄入对肾结石形成的影响。
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Multiple sclerosis and nephrolithiasis: a matched-case comparative study.多发性硬化症与肾结石:一项配对病例对照研究。
BJU Int. 2017 Jun;119(6):919-925. doi: 10.1111/bju.13820. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
10
The association between urinary calculi and increased risk of future cardiovascular events: A nationwide population-based study.尿路结石与未来心血管事件风险增加之间的关联:一项基于全国人口的研究。
J Cardiol. 2016 May;67(5):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

输尿管镜检查或体外冲击波碎石术后重复手术的时间过程和危险因素。

Time Course and Risk Factors for Repeat Procedures After Ureteroscopy or Shockwave Lithotripsy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.

出版信息

Urology. 2023 Apr;174:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.014. Epub 2022 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.014
PMID:36574909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10494519/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine risk factors and time course for repeat procedures after ureteroscopy (URS) or shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) procedure using a large employer-based claims database.

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent treatment for ureteral or renal stone with URS or SWL from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2014 using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Repeat stone procedure was evaluated after a 90-day grace period from the index procedure. Patients were followed until December 31, 2017. We performed multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards to determine independent risk factors for repeat procedure after the initial stone removal.

RESULTS

A total of 189,739 patients underwent a SWL or URS and were included in the study. The incidence of repeat procedure per 100 person years was 6.8, and 4.4 after SWL and URS, respectively. The median time to reoperation was 12.5 months for SWL and 14.6 months for URS. On multivariable analysis, SWL was associated with an increased risk of repeat procedure compared to URS. (HR = 1.63). Paralysis, neurogenic bladder and inflammatory bowel disease were also associated with an increased risk of repeat procedure (HR = 1.66, 1.40, and 1.36 respectively) CONCLUSION: In a large national cohort, patients with paralysis and neurogenic bladder had a significantly higher risk of repeat stone procedure. SWL was associated with higher risk of repeat procedure than URS. Urologists can use these data to identify and counsel patients at high risk for need for recurrent procedure.

摘要

目的

使用大型雇主索赔数据库确定输尿管镜检查 (URS) 或体外冲击波碎石术 (SWL) 后重复手术的危险因素和时间进程。

方法

我们使用 IBM MarketScan 商业数据库,从 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日,确定了所有接受 URS 或 SWL 治疗输尿管或肾结石的患者。在指数手术 90 天宽限期后,评估了重复结石手术。患者随访至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。我们使用 Cox 比例风险分析进行多变量分析,以确定初始结石清除后重复手术的独立危险因素。

结果

共有 189739 名患者接受了 SWL 或 URS 治疗,并纳入了本研究。每 100 人年的重复手术发生率为 6.8%,SWL 和 URS 分别为 4.4%。SWL 再手术的中位时间为 12.5 个月,URS 为 14.6 个月。多变量分析显示,与 URS 相比,SWL 与重复手术的风险增加相关 (HR=1.63)。瘫痪、神经性膀胱和炎症性肠病也与重复手术的风险增加相关 (HR=1.66、1.40 和 1.36)。

结论

在一个大型的全国队列中,瘫痪和神经性膀胱患者再次发生结石的风险显著增加。与 URS 相比,SWL 与更高的重复手术风险相关。泌尿科医生可以使用这些数据来识别和告知需要反复手术的高风险患者。