Suppr超能文献

《难治性心脏骤停(ARREST)试验中高级再灌注策略的原理和方法》。

Rationale and methods of the Advanced REperfusion STrategies for Refractory Cardiac Arrest (ARREST) trial.

机构信息

Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Medical School, Cardiovascular Division, Minneapolis, MN.

Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Medical School, Cardiovascular Division, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2020 Nov;229:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has emerged as a prominent therapy for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. However, the optimal time of initiation remains unknown.

AIM

The aim was to assess the rate of survival to hospital discharge in adult patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with 1 of 2 local standards of care: (1) early venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-facilitated resuscitation for circulatory support and percutaneous coronary intervention, when needed, or (2) standard advanced cardiac life support resuscitation.

DESIGN

Phase II, single-center, partially blinded, prospective, intention-to-treat, safety and efficacy clinical trial.

POPULATION

Adults (aged 18-75), initial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia, no ROSC following 3 shocks, body morphology to accommodate a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation device, and transfer time of <30 minutes.

SETTING

Hospital-based.

OUTCOMES

Primary: survival to hospital discharge. Secondary: safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and 3 and 6 months, and cost.

SAMPLE SIZE

Assuming success rates of 12% versus 37% in the 2 arms and 90% power, a type 1 error rate of .05, and a 15% rate of withdrawal prior to hospital discharge, the required sample size is N = 174 evaluated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARREST trial will generate safety/effectiveness data and comparative costs associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, informing broader implementation and a definitive Phase III clinical trial.

摘要

背景

体外膜肺氧合在治疗难治性心搏骤停患者方面已成为一种重要的治疗方法。然而,启动的最佳时机仍不清楚。

目的

评估接受两种当地标准治疗之一的难治性室颤/无脉性室性心动过速院外心脏骤停成年患者的存活率:(1)早期体外膜肺氧合辅助复苏以支持循环和进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,必要时进行;或(2)标准高级心脏生命支持复苏。

设计

二期、单中心、部分盲法、前瞻性、意向治疗、安全性和疗效临床试验。

人群

成人(18-75 岁),初始院外心脏骤停节律为室颤/无脉性室性心动过速,3 次电击后无自主循环恢复,身体形态适合伦德大学心脏骤停系统自动心肺复苏设备,且转运时间<30 分钟。

地点

医院内。

结局

主要结局:出院存活率。次要结局:安全性、出院时和 3 个月、6 个月的存活率和功能评估,以及成本。

样本量

假设 2 个治疗组的成功率分别为 12%和 37%,90%的效能,α 错误率为 0.05,出院前退出率为 15%,则需要评估的患者数量为 N=174。

结论

ARREST 试验将产生与体外心肺复苏相关的安全性/有效性数据和成本比较,为更广泛的实施和一项确定性三期临床试验提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验