Kalra Rajat, Gaisendrees Christopher, Alexy Tamas, Kosmopoulos Marinos, Voicu Sebastian, Bartos Jason A, Gurevich Sergey G, Raveendran Ganesh, Jaeger Deborah, Koukousaki Despoina, Elliott Andrea M, Bernal Alejandra Gutierrez, Dennis Mark, Burns Brian, Yannopoulos Demetris
Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany.
Resuscitation. 2025 Feb;207:110475. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110475. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
The haemodynamic effects veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remain inadequately understood. We investigated invasive left ventricular (LV) haemodynamics in patients who underwent treatment with an intensive care strategy involving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).
We conducted invasive haemodynamic assessments on 15 patients who underwent ECPR and achieved return of spontaneous circulation. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and stroke work (LVSW) were evaluated using simultaneous invasive left heart catheterization and 3D echocardiography. Paired comparisons between high and low VA-ECMO flow were performed.
Invasive haemodynamic studies were performed in 15 patients aged 58 (43,65) years at 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) days after cannulation. Six patients survived the index hospitalization, and 9 expired during the index hospitalization. Among the total cohort, transitioning from the highest VA-ECMO flow (median 4.0 L/min) to the lowest VA-ECMO flow (median 2.0 L/min) led to increases in LVEDV from 85 (68,125) mL to 106 (70,153) mL (p = 0.005) and LVEDP from 14 (8,23) mmHg to 17 (12,30) mmHg (p = 0.001), respectively. Similarly, the LVSW increased from 2051 ± 1525 mL*mmHg at the highest level of VA-ECMO flow to 2627 ± 1559 at the lowest VA-ECMO flow (p = 0.01).
High VA-ECMO flow significantly reduced LVEDP, LVEDV, and LVSW compared to low VA-ECMO flow.
静脉 - 动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA - ECMO)的血流动力学效应仍未得到充分了解。我们研究了接受包括体外心肺复苏(ECPR)在内的重症监护策略治疗的患者的有创左心室(LV)血流动力学。
我们对15例接受ECPR并实现自主循环恢复的患者进行了有创血流动力学评估。使用同步有创左心导管插入术和三维超声心动图评估左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)、射血分数(LVEF)、舒张末期容积(LVEDV)和每搏功(LVSW)。对高流量和低流量VA - ECMO进行配对比较。
在插管后3.0(2.0,4.0)天对15例年龄为58(43,65)岁的患者进行了有创血流动力学研究。6例患者在首次住院期间存活,9例在首次住院期间死亡。在整个队列中,从最高VA - ECMO流量(中位数4.0 L/min)转变为最低VA - ECMO流量(中位数2.0 L/min)导致LVEDV分别从85(68,125)mL增加至106(70,153)mL(p = 0.005),LVEDP从14(8,23)mmHg增加至17(12,30)mmHg(p = 0.001)。同样,LVSW从VA - ECMO流量最高水平时的2051±1525 mL*mmHg增加至VA - ECMO流量最低水平时的2627±1559(p = 0.01)。
与低流量VA - ECMO相比,高流量VA - ECMO显著降低了LVEDP、LVEDV和LVSW。