Suppr超能文献

针对院外心脏骤停和难治性心室颤动患者的高级再灌注策略(ARREST):一项 2 期、单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。

Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Center for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1807-1816. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32338-2. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation.

METHODS

For this phase 2, single centre, open-label, adaptive, safety and efficacy randomised clinical trial, we included adults aged 18-75 years presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (MN, USA) with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation, no return of spontaneous circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System, and estimated transfer time shorter than 30 min. Patients were randomly assigned to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation or standard ACLS treatment on hospital arrival by use of a secure schedule generated with permuted blocks of randomly varying block sizes. Allocation concealment was achieved by use of a randomisation schedule that required scratching off an opaque layer to reveal assignment. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and at 3 months and 6 months after discharge. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The study qualified for exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24). The ARREST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880565.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 8, 2019, and June 14, 2020, 36 patients were assessed for inclusion. After exclusion of six patients, 30 were randomly assigned to standard ACLS treatment (n=15) or to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation (n=15). One patient in the ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group withdrew from the study before discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range 36-73), and 25 (83%) of 30 patients were men. Survival to hospital discharge was observed in one (7%) of 15 patients (95% credible interval 1·6-30·2) in the standard ACLS treatment group versus six (43%) of 14 patients (21·3-67·7) in the early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group (risk difference 36·2%, 3·7-59·2; posterior probability of ECMO superiority 0·9861). The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute after unanimous recommendation from the Data Safety Monitoring Board after enrolling 30 patients because the posterior probability of ECMO superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary. Cumulative 6-month survival was significantly better in the early ECMO group than in the standard ACLS group. No unanticipated serious adverse events were observed.

INTERPRETATION

Early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation for patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation significantly improved survival to hospital discharge compared with standard ACLS treatment.

FUNDING

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

摘要

背景

在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)和心室颤动患者中,超过一半的患者出现难治性心室颤动,对初始标准高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)治疗无反应。我们在美国进行了第一项随机临床试验,比较体外膜氧合(ECMO)辅助复苏与标准 ACLS 治疗 OHCA 和难治性心室颤动患者的效果。

方法

在这项 2 期、单中心、开放标签、适应性、安全性和疗效随机临床试验中,我们纳入了年龄在 18-75 岁之间的成年人,他们在明尼苏达大学医学中心(MN,美国)出现 OHCA 和难治性心室颤动,在进行三次电击后无自主循环恢复,使用 Lund 大学心脏骤停系统进行自动心肺复苏,预计转移时间短于 30 分钟。患者在入院时通过使用具有随机变化块大小的置换块生成的安全计划,随机分配到早期 ECMO 辅助复苏或标准 ACLS 治疗。通过使用需要刮掉不透明层以显示分配的随机化计划来实现隐藏分配。主要结局是出院时的存活。次要结局是安全性、出院时和出院后 3 个月和 6 个月的存活和功能评估。所有分析均基于意向治疗进行。该研究符合免除知情同意的条件(21 联邦法规 50.24)。ARREST 试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT03880565。

结果

在 2019 年 8 月 8 日至 2020 年 6 月 14 日期间,对 36 名患者进行了纳入评估。排除 6 名患者后,30 名患者被随机分配到标准 ACLS 治疗组(n=15)或早期 ECMO 辅助复苏组(n=15)。在出院前,ECMO 辅助复苏组的一名患者退出了研究。平均年龄为 59 岁(范围 36-73 岁),30 名患者中有 25 名(83%)为男性。标准 ACLS 治疗组出院时存活 1 例(7%)(95%可信区间 1.6-30.2),而早期 ECMO 辅助复苏组出院时存活 6 例(43%)(21.3-67.7)(风险差异 36.2%,3.7-59.2;ECMO 优势的后验概率 0.9861)。在纳入 30 名患者后,国家心肺血液研究所的数据安全监测委员会一致建议,该研究在第一次预先计划的中期分析时终止,因为 ECMO 优势的后验概率超过了预设的监测边界。早期 ECMO 组的 6 个月累积存活率明显高于标准 ACLS 组。未观察到意外的严重不良事件。

解释

与标准 ACLS 治疗相比,OHCA 和难治性心室颤动患者的早期 ECMO 辅助复苏显著提高了出院时的存活率。

资金来源

国家心肺血液研究所。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验