• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经常使用初级保健和急诊服务的体验:定性系统评价和主题综合。

Experience of being a frequent user of primary care and emergency department services: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.

机构信息

Département de Médecine de Famille et de Médecine d'urgence, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Département de Médecine de Famille, Université McGill, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e033351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033351.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033351
PMID:32912938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7482492/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frequent users of healthcare services are often categorised as 'heavy-cost patients'. In the recent years, many jurisdictions have attempted to implement different public policies to optimise the use of health services by frequent users. However, throughout this process, little attention has been paid to their experience as patients.

OBJECTIVE

To thematically synthesise qualitative studies that explore the experience of frequent users of primary care and emergency department services.

DESIGN

Qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.

SETTING

Primary care and emergency department.

PARTICIPANTS

Frequent users of primary care and emergency department services.

METHODS

A qualitative systematic review was conducted using three online databases (MEDLINE with full text, CINAHL with full text and PsycINFO). This search was combined to an extensive manual search of reference lists and related citations. A thematic synthesis was performed to develop descriptive themes and analytical constructs.

STUDY SELECTION

Twelve studies were included. All included studies met the following inclusion criteria: qualitative design; published in English; discussed frequent users' experiences from their own perspectives and users' experiences occurred in primary care and/or emergency departments.

RESULTS

The predominant aspects of frequent users' experiences were: (1) the experience of being ill and (2) the healthcare experience. The experience of being ill encompassed four central themes: physical limitations, mental suffering, impact on relationships and the role of self-management. The healthcare experience embraced the experience of accessing healthcare and the global experience of receiving care.

CONCLUSION

This synthesis sheds light on potential changes to healthcare delivery in order to improve frequent users' experiences: individualised care plans or case management interventions to support self-management of symptoms and reduce psychological distress; and giving greater importance on the patient-providers relationship as a central facet of healthcare delivery. This synthesis also highlights future research directions that would benefit frequent users.

摘要

背景

医疗服务的频繁使用者通常被归类为“高成本患者”。近年来,许多司法管辖区试图实施不同的公共政策,以优化频繁使用者对卫生服务的使用。然而,在这一过程中,很少关注他们作为患者的体验。

目的

对探索初级保健和急诊服务频繁使用者体验的定性研究进行主题综合分析。

设计

定性系统评价和主题综合分析。

设置

初级保健和急诊。

参与者

初级保健和急诊服务的频繁使用者。

方法

使用三个在线数据库(全文 MEDLINE、全文 CINAHL 和 PsycINFO)进行定性系统评价。该搜索与参考列表和相关引文的广泛手动搜索相结合。进行主题综合分析以开发描述性主题和分析结构。

研究选择

纳入了 12 项研究。所有纳入的研究均符合以下纳入标准:定性设计;以英文发表;从自身角度讨论频繁使用者的体验,且使用者的体验发生在初级保健和/或急诊部门。

结果

频繁使用者体验的主要方面是:(1)患病体验和(2)医疗保健体验。患病体验包括四个核心主题:身体限制、精神痛苦、对人际关系的影响和自我管理的作用。医疗保健体验包括获得医疗保健的体验和接受医疗保健的整体体验。

结论

该综合分析揭示了为改善频繁使用者的体验而改变医疗服务提供方式的潜在方法:个性化护理计划或病例管理干预措施,以支持症状的自我管理和减轻心理困扰;并更加重视患者与提供者的关系作为医疗服务提供的核心方面。该综合分析还强调了有益于频繁使用者的未来研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af7d/7482492/b40f8a78074d/bmjopen-2019-033351f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af7d/7482492/66cad751cd6d/bmjopen-2019-033351f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af7d/7482492/b40f8a78074d/bmjopen-2019-033351f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af7d/7482492/66cad751cd6d/bmjopen-2019-033351f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af7d/7482492/b40f8a78074d/bmjopen-2019-033351f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Experience of being a frequent user of primary care and emergency department services: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.经常使用初级保健和急诊服务的体验:定性系统评价和主题综合。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e033351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033351.
2
Improving care planning and coordination for service users with medical co-morbidity transitioning between tertiary medical and primary care services.改善患有合并症的服务使用者在三级医疗服务和初级医疗服务之间转诊时的护理计划与协调。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):337-347. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12322. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Service users experience of psychological interventions in primary care settings: A qualitative meta-synthesis.初级保健机构中服务使用者对心理干预的体验:一项质性元整合研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Mar;29(2):400-423. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2650. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
4
Mental health service users' experiences of mental health care: an integrative literature review.精神卫生服务使用者的精神卫生保健经历:一项综合性文献综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Apr;22(3):171-82. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12202. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
5
Women service users' experiences of inpatient mental health services and staff experiences of providing care to women within inpatient mental health services: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.女性服务使用者在住院精神卫生服务中的体验,以及工作人员在住院精神卫生服务中为女性提供护理的体验:定性证据的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jun;118:103920. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103920. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review.频繁使用基层医疗保健和急诊部门人群的心理困扰:范围综述。
Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
What are the experiences and the perceptions of service users attending Emergency Department for a mental health crisis? A systematic review.服务使用者在急诊部门因精神健康危机就诊的经历和感受是什么?一项系统评价。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Apr;31(2):400-423. doi: 10.1111/inm.12968. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Understanding management and support for domestic violence and abuse within emergency departments: A systematic literature review from 2000-2015.了解急诊科中家庭暴力和虐待的管理和支持:2000-2015 年的系统文献回顾。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4013-4027. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13849. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Psychiatric service users' experiences of emergency departments: a CERQual review of qualitative studies.精神科服务使用者在急诊科的经历:对定性研究的CERQual综述
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 May;71(4):315-323. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1288759. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Municipal healthcare providers' perceptions of reasons for frequent and unplanned hospital admissions among home-dwelling older adults: a Norwegian focus group study.市政医疗服务提供者对居家老年人频繁和非计划性住院原因的看法:一项挪威焦点小组研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06279-9.
2
Frequent Users in Psychiatric Consultations: A 6-Year Retrospective Study in the Emergency Department.精神科会诊中的频繁使用者:急诊科的一项6年回顾性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 23;22(6):828. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060828.
3
Determinants of frequent use of open consultations: a study on patient demographics, chronic conditions, and utilization patterns in primary care.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Experiences of Persons Who Frequently Visit the Emergency Department for Mental Health-Related Reasons.探索经常因心理健康相关原因前往急诊部的人的体验。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Mar;28(4):587-599. doi: 10.1177/1049732317746382. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
2
Living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The stories of frequent attenders to the Emergency Department.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的生活:急诊科频繁就诊者的故事。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):48-56. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13842. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
3
Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services With Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Family Experience.
开放问诊频繁使用的决定因素:一项关于初级保健中患者人口统计学、慢性病及利用模式的研究
Porto Biomed J. 2025 Mar 7;10(2):e282. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000282. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr.
4
Exploring the lived experience of receiving mental health crisis care at emergency departments, crisis phone lines and crisis care alternatives.探索在急诊部门、危机热线和危机护理替代方案中接受心理健康危机护理的真实体验。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14045. doi: 10.1111/hex.14045.
5
A qualitative system model to describe the causes and drivers of frequent potentially avoidable presentations to the emergency department.一个用于描述频繁前往急诊科进行潜在可避免就诊的原因和驱动因素的定性系统模型。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 4;9(11):e21304. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21304. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Experiences of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments in Health Care Setting in French-Speaking Switzerland: A Qualitative Study.瑞士法语区医疗环境中急诊科频繁使用者的经历:一项定性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;11(9):1228. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091228.
7
Understanding the experience in the healthcare system of non-migrant and migrant frequent users of the emergency department in French-speaking Switzerland: a comparative qualitative study.理解法语瑞士急诊部门非移民和移民高频使用者的医疗保健系统体验:一项比较定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 24;13(4):e069272. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069272.
8
Potential Help-Seeking Behaviors Associated with Better Self-Rated Health among Rural Older Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.农村老年患者自评健康状况较好与潜在求助行为的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 29;18(17):9116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179116.
慢性病医疗服务频繁使用者的基层医疗病例管理:患者及家庭体验的定性研究
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):523-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1867.
4
Patient experience in the emergency department: inconsistencies in the ethic and duty of care.急诊科的患者体验:伦理与护理职责中的不一致之处。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):275-88. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12612. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Emergency department use: is frequent use associated with a lack of primary care provider?急诊科的使用情况:频繁使用是否与缺乏初级保健提供者有关?
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Apr;60(4):e223-9.
6
Struggling on my own: a cognitive perspective on frequent attenders' conception of life and their interaction with the healthcare system.独自挣扎:关于频繁就诊者的生活观念及其与医疗系统互动的认知视角
Psychiatry J. 2013;2013:580175. doi: 10.1155/2013/580175. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
7
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ.提高定性研究报告合成透明度:ENTREQ。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
8
During and beyond the triage encounter: chronically ill elderly patients' experiences throughout their emergency department attendances.在分诊期间及之后:慢性病老年患者在整个急诊科就诊过程中的经历。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2012 Oct;20(4):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
9
Should we exclude inadequately reported studies from qualitative systematic reviews? An evaluation of sensitivity analyses in two case study reviews.是否应将报告不充分的研究排除在定性系统评价之外?对两项案例研究综述中敏感性分析的评估。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1425-34. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452937. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.共同决策——以患者为中心的医疗的巅峰。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.