Suppr超能文献

尼日利亚西南部草药及非医院医疗服务的患病率、影响因素和认知:一项横断面研究

Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Aina Olujimi, Gautam Lata, Simkhada Padam, Hall Sarah

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University-Cambridge Campus, Cambridge, UK.

School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University-Cambridge Campus, Cambridge, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e040769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040769.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prevalence, determinants, safety perceptions, effectiveness and knowledge of herbal medicines (HMs) and reasons for non-hospital utilisation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria.

PARTICIPANTS

A representative sample (n=1600) of adults (18 years or above) currently living in Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria for at least 2 years, at the time of study.

RESULTS

The majority of the respondents (85% n=1265) have used HMs in the last 2 years. Across economic classes use, middle income (88.3%) was the highest (p<0.001), suggesting poverty is not a major factor, even with income inequality. Their use was the most common among respondents with a primary level of education (91.4%, p=0.001); and 100% use (p=0.009) of respondents practising African traditional religion; farmers and those 70 years or above. Our study also reveals more men (p<0.001) used HMs (89.9%) than women (78.6%) and effectiveness was a major reason for use (39.6%) followed by affordability (31.9%). Although the majority of the respondents (90%) knew the difference between certified and uncertified HMs, uncertified ones were the most commonly used (37.3%) in the population.

CONCLUSION

Although there is a cultural history of HM use within the study population, the choice of use was based on their effectiveness. Therefore, a scientifically valid analysis of this claim within the study population may help achieve a cheaper and affordable healthcare alternative which will be safe. This is important, considering that uncertified HMs were chosen over certified ones, even though a large majority of respondents were aware of differences and likely consequences. This study highlights the need for further investment by the government, individuals and corporate stakeholders in HM research and improvement of conventional healthcare system. This is in addition to public health awareness on the danger of use of uncertified herbal products.

摘要

目的

研究草药(HMs)的使用 prevalence、决定因素、安全认知、有效性及相关知识,以及非医院使用草药的原因。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

尼日利亚西南部埃基蒂州。

参与者

在研究时,从尼日利亚西南部埃基蒂州目前居住至少2年的18岁及以上成年人中抽取的具有代表性的样本(n = 1600)。

结果

大多数受访者(85%,n = 1265)在过去2年中使用过草药。在不同经济阶层的使用情况中,中等收入群体(88.3%)的使用率最高(p < 0.001),这表明即使存在收入不平等,贫困也不是主要因素。在小学教育水平的受访者中,草药的使用最为普遍(91.4%,p = 0.001);信奉非洲传统宗教的受访者、农民以及70岁及以上的人群中,草药使用率达100%(p = 0.009)。我们的研究还表明,使用草药的男性(89.9%)多于女性(78.6%)(p < 0.001),使用草药的主要原因是有效性(39.6%),其次是可承受性(31.9%)。尽管大多数受访者(90%)知道认证草药和未认证草药的区别,但未认证草药在人群中的使用最为普遍(37.3%)。

结论

尽管研究人群中有使用草药的文化历史,但使用草药的选择是基于其有效性。因此,在研究人群中对这一说法进行科学有效的分析,可能有助于实现一种更便宜且可承受的安全医疗保健替代方案。考虑到即使大多数受访者知道差异和可能的后果,但仍选择未认证草药而非认证草药,这一点很重要。本研究强调政府、个人和企业利益相关者需要进一步投资于草药研究并改善传统医疗保健系统。此外,还需要提高公众对使用未认证草药产品危险性的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa1d/7485235/11c2a37e7477/bmjopen-2020-040769f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验