Karlsson M, Steinvall I, Olofsson P, Thorfinn J, Sjöberg F, Åstrand L, Fayiz S, Khalaf A, Divyasree P, El-Serafi A T, Elmasry M
Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burns in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sharjah Institute for Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2020 Jun 30;33(2):134-142.
The standard treatment of burns is early excision followed by autologous skin grafting. The closure of extensive deep burns poses a considerable challenge. Cultured autologous keratinocytes have been used since 1981 in an effort to improve healing. However, the time required to culture the cells and the lack of a dermal component limit the expectations of outcome. Our aim was to compare the duration of hospital stay between patients who were treated with autologous skin grafts and cultured autologous keratinocytes and those who were treated with autologous skin grafting without cultured autologous keratinocytes. In this retrospective study all patients treated with cultured autologous keratinocytes between 2012 and 2015 were matched by size and depth of burn with patients not treated with cultured autologous keratinocytes. Multivariable regression was used to analyse associations between duration of hospital stay and treatment adjusted for age, mortality, size and depth of the burn. Then, we investigated the possibility of differentiation of human bone marrow stem cell line to keratinocyte- like cells as a future direction. The regression analysis showed a coefficient of 17.36 (95% CI -17.69 to 52.40), p= 0.32, for hospital stay in the treatment group, compared with the matched group. Our results showed no difference in the duration of hospital stay between the two treatments. Autologous stem cells should be considered as a future modality of burn management, although further studies are needed.
烧伤的标准治疗方法是早期切除,随后进行自体皮肤移植。大面积深度烧伤的创面闭合是一项巨大挑战。自1981年以来,培养的自体角质形成细胞被用于改善愈合情况。然而,细胞培养所需时间以及缺乏真皮成分限制了治疗效果预期。我们的目的是比较接受自体皮肤移植和培养的自体角质形成细胞治疗的患者与仅接受自体皮肤移植而未使用培养的自体角质形成细胞治疗的患者之间的住院时间。在这项回顾性研究中,将2012年至2015年间所有接受培养的自体角质形成细胞治疗的患者,按照烧伤面积和深度与未接受培养的自体角质形成细胞治疗的患者进行匹配。采用多变量回归分析住院时间与治疗之间的关联,并对年龄、死亡率、烧伤面积和深度进行校正。然后,我们研究了人类骨髓干细胞系分化为角质形成细胞样细胞作为未来发展方向的可能性。回归分析显示,与匹配组相比,治疗组的住院时间系数为17.36(95%可信区间为-17.69至52.40),p = 0.32。我们的结果表明,两种治疗方法的住院时间没有差异。尽管还需要进一步研究,但自体干细胞应被视为烧伤治疗的未来模式。