Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Dermatology, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Brain Behav. 2020 Nov;10(11):e01831. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1831. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a degenerative brain disease that progresses over time, heavily burdening patients, families, and aging societies worldwide. Memantine and donepezil are frequently used in its treatment, both as monotherapy and in combination. This multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of these regimens and placebo in the management of AD.
We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Wanfang Med Online and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for English and Chinese publications from the first records to 17 April 2020. Two investigators scanned articles for placebo-controlled trials of memantine and donepezil alone and in combination. We extracted data on the following outcomes: cognition, global assessment, daily activities, neuropsychiatric symptoms, adverse events, and the acceptability and cost of these treatment regimens.
Of 936 records screened, we included 54 trials in this analysis. The combination therapy was more effective in improving cognition (mean difference (MD)-5.01, 95% credible interval (95% Crl) -10.73 to 0.86 in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; MD 9.61, 95% Crl 2.29 to 16.97 in the Severe Impairment Battery), global assessment (MD -2.88, 95% Crl -6.04 to 0.40), daily activities (MD 13.06, 95% Crl -34.04 to 58.92), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (MD -6.84, 95% Crl -10.62 to -2.82) compared with placebo. Memantine was more acceptable than placebo (MD 0.93, 95% Crl 0.69 to 1.22).
Memantine plus donepezil showed superior outcomes for cognition, global assessment, daily activities, and neuropsychiatric symptoms, but lower acceptability than monotherapy and placebo. Combination therapy may be more cost-effective, because memantine slows the progression of AD.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性脑部疾病,随着时间的推移病情逐渐加重,给全球的患者、家庭和老龄化社会带来了沉重负担。美金刚和多奈哌齐常用于该病的治疗,既可单药治疗,也可联合用药。本项多治疗方案比较的荟萃分析评估了这些方案与安慰剂在 AD 治疗中的疗效。
我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和万方医学在线及中国知网,纳入了从建库至 2020 年 4 月 17 日发表的关于美金刚和多奈哌齐单药和联合用药的安慰剂对照试验。两位研究者筛选了关于认知、总体评估、日常活动、神经精神症状、不良事件及这些治疗方案的可接受性和费用的研究数据。
在筛查出的 936 篇文献中,我们有 54 项试验纳入本分析。与安慰剂相比,联合治疗在改善认知(阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表的平均差值(MD)-5.01,95%可信区间(95% Crl)-10.73 至 0.86;严重损害量表的 MD 9.61,95% Crl 2.29 至 16.97)、总体评估(MD-2.88,95% Crl-6.04 至 0.40)、日常活动(MD 13.06,95% Crl-34.04 至 58.92)和神经精神症状(MD-6.84,95% Crl-10.62 至-2.82)方面更有效。与安慰剂相比,美金刚的可接受性更高(MD 0.93,95% Crl 0.69 至 1.22)。
美金刚联合多奈哌齐治疗在认知、总体评估、日常活动和神经精神症状方面的疗效优于单药治疗和安慰剂,但可接受性较低。联合治疗可能更具成本效益,因为美金刚能减缓 AD 的进展。