Fantus Sophia, Newman Peter A
School of Social Work.
Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2021;91(1):9-19. doi: 10.1037/ort0000513. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Pervasive bias-based bullying of sexual and gender minority youth amid often hostile school climates signals the importance of systems approaches to effect change. Nevertheless, most research on bullying victimization tends to adopt either lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)-specific approaches or broader approaches that omit mention of LGBT youth. We conducted a qualitative study, with the as an organizing analytical framework, to explore determinants of school climate for LGBT youth and strategies for intervention. In-depth, semistructured interviews with 16 key informants, including teachers, school staff, administrators, frontline community providers, and experts on bullying victimization of LGBT youth, illustrate reciprocal and multilevel factors that produce school climates, which in turn foster or prevent bullying of LGBT youth. Not only do distal factors (e.g., LGBT-affirmative legislation, targeted resource allocation for LGBT programming) impact school microsystems, but proximal factors in the microsystem, including enacted homophobia and transphobia through multilateral interpersonal interactions, also influence meso- and macrolevel phenomena, such as the values and mission of the school. Participants recommended multilateral interventions and training that address both proximal and distal contexts of school social ecologies, including teacher-student, peer-to-peer (e.g., gay-straight alliances), and teacher-administrator interactions; behavioral health professional roles and responsibilities; school curricula and libraries; school-board engagement with individual schools; LGBT-inclusive policies; targeted resource allocation; and systemwide accountability. Positive school climates for LGBT youth are promoted through multilevel and reciprocal interventions that support social, psychological, and physical safety not just for LGBT students but for all students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在往往充满敌意的学校环境中,基于偏见对性少数和性别少数青年进行普遍的欺凌行为,凸显了采用系统方法来实现变革的重要性。然而,大多数关于欺凌受害情况的研究往往要么采用针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGBT)的特定方法,要么采用更宽泛的方法,但却忽略了LGBT青年。我们进行了一项定性研究,以[具体框架]作为组织分析框架,探讨LGBT青年学校氛围的决定因素和干预策略。对16名关键信息提供者进行了深入的半结构化访谈,这些信息提供者包括教师、学校工作人员、管理人员、一线社区服务提供者以及LGBT青年欺凌受害问题专家,访谈结果揭示了产生学校氛围的相互作用和多层次因素,而这种氛围反过来又会促进或防止对LGBT青年的欺凌行为。不仅远端因素(例如,支持LGBT的立法、为LGBT项目进行有针对性的资源分配)会影响学校微观系统,微观系统中的近端因素,包括通过多边人际互动表现出的恐同和恐跨现象,也会影响中观和宏观层面的现象,比如学校的价值观和使命。参与者建议采取多边干预和培训措施,以应对学校社会生态的近端和远端背景,包括师生、同伴之间(例如同性恋-异性恋联盟)以及教师-管理人员之间的互动;行为健康专业人员的角色和职责;学校课程和图书馆;学校董事会与各个学校的互动;包含LGBT群体的政策;有针对性的资源分配;以及全系统的问责制。通过多层次和相互作用的干预措施来促进对LGBT青年有利的学校氛围,这些干预措施不仅为LGBT学生,也为所有学生提供社会、心理和身体安全方面的支持。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)