Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for LGBT Health Research, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for LGBT Health Research, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Adolesc Health. 2019 May;64(5):608-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.11.012. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
Homophobic school climates are related to increased victimization for sexual minority youth (SMY), leading to increased risk of adverse mental health outcomes. Interventions that promote positive school climate may reduce the risk of victimization and adverse mental health outcomes in SMY. This study explored whether lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ)-inclusive sex education is associated with adverse mental health and school-based victimization in U.S. youth.
Data analysis of representative data from the 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey and the 2014 School Health Profiles was conducted using multilevel logistic models testing whether youth in states with higher proportions of schools teaching LGBTQ-inclusive sex education had lower odds of reporting being bullied in school and experiencing adverse mental health outcomes, including depressive symptoms and suicidality.
After controlling for covariates, protective effects for all youth were found for suicidal thoughts (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: .91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .89-.93) and making a suicide plan (AOR: .79; 95% CI: .77-.80). Lesbian and gay youth had lower odds of experiencing bullying in school as the proportion of schools within a state teaching LGBTQ-inclusive sex education increased (AOR: .83; CI: .71-.97). Bisexual youth had significantly lower odds of reporting depressive symptoms (AOR: .92; 95% CI: .87-.98).
Students in states with a greater proportion of LGBTQ-inclusive sex education have lower odds of experiencing school-based victimization and adverse mental health. These findings can be used to guide intervention development at the school and state levels.
对性少数青年(SMY)而言,恐同的学校氛围会导致其遭受更多的侵害,从而增加其心理健康不良后果的风险。促进积极的学校氛围的干预措施可能会降低 SMY 遭受侵害和出现心理健康不良后果的风险。本研究探讨了包含同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和 questioning(LGBTQ)群体的性教育是否与美国青少年的心理健康不良和基于学校的侵害有关。
使用多层次逻辑回归模型对 2015 年青少年风险行为调查和 2014 年学校健康概况的代表性数据进行数据分析,检验在教授包含 LGBTQ 群体的性教育的学校比例较高的州,其学生报告在学校被欺凌和出现心理健康不良后果(包括抑郁症状和自杀意念)的可能性是否较低。
在控制了协变量后,对于所有青少年,自杀意念(调整后的优势比 [AOR]:0.91,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.89-0.93)和自杀计划(AOR:0.79;95% CI:0.77-0.80)都有保护作用。随着州内教授包含 LGBTQ 群体的性教育的学校比例增加,同性恋和双性恋青少年在学校遭受欺凌的可能性降低(AOR:0.83;CI:0.71-0.97)。双性恋青少年报告抑郁症状的可能性显著降低(AOR:0.92;95% CI:0.87-0.98)。
在包含 LGBTQ 群体的性教育比例较高的州,学生遭受基于学校的侵害和心理健康不良的可能性较低。这些发现可用于指导学校和州层面的干预措施的制定。