Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Orthop Res. 2021 Jul;39(7):1423-1432. doi: 10.1002/jor.24855. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
Dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with reduced dislocation rates; however, the kinematic mechanism of dislocation in DM THA constructs is still not well understood. This study hypothesizes that the difference in kinematics between DM THA and conventional THA designs contributes to reduced dislocation rates of DM THA. In addition, this study aims to quantify and compare those kinematic parameters between DM THA and conventional THA using a validated dual fluoroscopy imaging system (DFIS) and finite element (FE) modelling. Fresh frozen cadavers were measured to compare the impingement-free range of motion and provocative subluxation kinematics among three THA constructs: (1) DM, (2) constrained liner (CS), and (3) 36 mm head diameter neutral liner (NL). The DFIS was used to measure the in vitro kinematics of the hip. Subject-specific FE models were developed to assess the horizontal dislocation distance and resistive torque at dislocation. The DM construct head exhibited increased provocative anterior and posterior subluxation range of motion before dislocation when compared to CS constructs (p = .05; p = .03), as well as NL constructs (p = .05). The DM THA showed a significantly larger posterior horizontal dislocation distance, as well as smaller resistive torque at dislocation, when compared to NL (p = .05; p = .03) and CS constructs (p = .04; p = .01). Our findings demonstrate there was increased provocative subluxation range of motion as well as normalized jump distance for the DM constructs compared to the NL and CS constructs, suggesting the DM THA may provide increased stability hip during at-risk functional hip positions.
双动(DM)全髋关节置换术(THA)与降低脱位率相关;然而,DM-THA 结构脱位的运动学机制仍未得到很好的理解。本研究假设 DM-THA 和传统 THA 设计之间的运动学差异有助于降低 DM-THA 的脱位率。此外,本研究旨在使用经过验证的双荧光透视成像系统(DFIS)和有限元(FE)建模来量化和比较 DM-THA 和传统 THA 之间的这些运动学参数。对新鲜冷冻尸体进行测量,以比较三种 THA 结构(1)DM、(2)约束衬垫(CS)和(3)36mm 头直径中性衬垫(NL)之间的无撞击运动范围和诱发半脱位运动学。DFIS 用于测量髋关节的体外运动学。建立了针对特定个体的 FE 模型,以评估脱位时的水平脱位距离和抗阻扭矩。与 CS 结构(p=.05;p=.03)相比,DM 结构的头在脱位前表现出增加的诱发前侧和后侧半脱位运动范围,以及 NL 结构(p=.05)。与 NL(p=.05;p=.03)和 CS 结构(p=.04;p=.01)相比,DM-THA 在后侧水平脱位距离明显更大,脱位时的抗阻扭矩更小。我们的研究结果表明,与 NL 和 CS 结构相比,DM 结构的诱发半脱位运动范围更大,并且归一化跳跃距离更大,这表明 DM-THA 可能在高危功能髋部位置提供增加的稳定性。