• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双动全髋关节置换术后脱位机制的三维运动学分析。

Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of dislocation mechanism in dual mobility total hip arthroplasty constructs.

机构信息

Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2021 Jul;39(7):1423-1432. doi: 10.1002/jor.24855. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1002/jor.24855
PMID:32915465
Abstract

Dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with reduced dislocation rates; however, the kinematic mechanism of dislocation in DM THA constructs is still not well understood. This study hypothesizes that the difference in kinematics between DM THA and conventional THA designs contributes to reduced dislocation rates of DM THA. In addition, this study aims to quantify and compare those kinematic parameters between DM THA and conventional THA using a validated dual fluoroscopy imaging system (DFIS) and finite element (FE) modelling. Fresh frozen cadavers were measured to compare the impingement-free range of motion and provocative subluxation kinematics among three THA constructs: (1) DM, (2) constrained liner (CS), and (3) 36 mm head diameter neutral liner (NL). The DFIS was used to measure the in vitro kinematics of the hip. Subject-specific FE models were developed to assess the horizontal dislocation distance and resistive torque at dislocation. The DM construct head exhibited increased provocative anterior and posterior subluxation range of motion before dislocation when compared to CS constructs (p = .05; p = .03), as well as NL constructs (p = .05). The DM THA showed a significantly larger posterior horizontal dislocation distance, as well as smaller resistive torque at dislocation, when compared to NL (p = .05; p = .03) and CS constructs (p = .04; p = .01). Our findings demonstrate there was increased provocative subluxation range of motion as well as normalized jump distance for the DM constructs compared to the NL and CS constructs, suggesting the DM THA may provide increased stability hip during at-risk functional hip positions.

摘要

双动(DM)全髋关节置换术(THA)与降低脱位率相关;然而,DM-THA 结构脱位的运动学机制仍未得到很好的理解。本研究假设 DM-THA 和传统 THA 设计之间的运动学差异有助于降低 DM-THA 的脱位率。此外,本研究旨在使用经过验证的双荧光透视成像系统(DFIS)和有限元(FE)建模来量化和比较 DM-THA 和传统 THA 之间的这些运动学参数。对新鲜冷冻尸体进行测量,以比较三种 THA 结构(1)DM、(2)约束衬垫(CS)和(3)36mm 头直径中性衬垫(NL)之间的无撞击运动范围和诱发半脱位运动学。DFIS 用于测量髋关节的体外运动学。建立了针对特定个体的 FE 模型,以评估脱位时的水平脱位距离和抗阻扭矩。与 CS 结构(p=.05;p=.03)相比,DM 结构的头在脱位前表现出增加的诱发前侧和后侧半脱位运动范围,以及 NL 结构(p=.05)。与 NL(p=.05;p=.03)和 CS 结构(p=.04;p=.01)相比,DM-THA 在后侧水平脱位距离明显更大,脱位时的抗阻扭矩更小。我们的研究结果表明,与 NL 和 CS 结构相比,DM 结构的诱发半脱位运动范围更大,并且归一化跳跃距离更大,这表明 DM-THA 可能在高危功能髋部位置提供增加的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of dislocation mechanism in dual mobility total hip arthroplasty constructs.双动全髋关节置换术后脱位机制的三维运动学分析。
J Orthop Res. 2021 Jul;39(7):1423-1432. doi: 10.1002/jor.24855. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
2
Does-dual mobility still offer improved stability in smaller cup sizes? A computer modelling comparison of stability with 22-mm versus 28-mm inner heads in dual-mobility versus single-bearing constructs.双动是否仍能在较小的杯径中提供更好的稳定性?在双动与单轴承结构中,22 毫米与 28 毫米内头比较稳定性的计算机建模比较。
Hip Int. 2024 Jul;34(4):476-481. doi: 10.1177/11207000231220031. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?在翻修全髋关节置换术中,受限衬垫脱位能否通过双动结构挽救?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):305-312. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000026.
4
Dual mobility cups provide biomechanical advantages in situations at risk for dislocation: a finite element analysis.双动髋臼杯在存在脱位风险的情况下具有生物力学优势:一项有限元分析。
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):551-556. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3368-z. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
Effect of intraoperative treatment options on hip joint stability following total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后术中治疗方案对髋关节稳定性的影响。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Mar;40(3):604-613. doi: 10.1002/jor.25055. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.奥托·奥夫兰克奖:与大股骨头相比,翻修全髋关节置换术中双动结构减少了脱位、再次翻修和再次手术的发生率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000035.
7
Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?双动杯几何形状是否会影响后方水平脱位距离?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1535-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3469-1. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
8
Impact of alignment and kinematic variation on resistive moment and dislocation propensity for THA with lipped and neutral liners.有边和中性衬垫全髋关节置换术中对线和运动学变化对阻力矩和脱位倾向的影响。
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2020 Aug;19(4):1297-1307. doi: 10.1007/s10237-020-01359-8. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups.翻修全髋关节置换术与 Kerboull 钢板:使用标准与双动杯的比较结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2245-2251. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4209-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
High Rate of Early Intraprosthetic Dislocations of Dual Mobility Implants: A Single Surgeon Series of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacements.双动假体早期内置脱位率高:一位外科医生的初次和翻修全髋关节置换术系列。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2793-2798. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial (DISTINCT) : statistical analysis plan.双活动度与传统全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折:一项注册研究嵌套、开放标签、整群随机交叉试验(DISTINCT):统计分析计划
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Aug 4;6(8):866-875. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0042.
2
Defining the optimal position of the lipped liner in combination with cup orientation and stem version.结合髋臼杯方向和柄部外翻角度确定带唇缘内衬的最佳位置。
Bone Joint Res. 2023 Sep 20;12(9):571-579. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.129.BJR-2022-0471.R1.