Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;228:164-176.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
To determine the associations of stress ulcer prophylaxis with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, nosocomial pneumonia (NP), mortality, and length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in the English language assessing the effects of proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists on patients in the PICU published before October 2018 from the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. A random-effects Mantel-Haenszel risk difference (MHRD) model was used to pool all the selected studies for meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were the incidences of GI bleeding and NP. Secondary outcomes included mortality and length of PICU stay.
Seventeen studies (4 RCTs and 13 observational studies) with a total of 340 763 patients were included. The overall incidence of GI bleeding was 15.2%. There was no difference in the risk of GI bleeding based on stress ulcer prophylaxis status (MHRD, 5.0%; 95% CI, -1.0% to 11.0%; I = 62%). There was an increased risk of NP in patients who received stress ulcer prophylaxis compared with those who did not (MHRD, 5.3%; 95% CI, 3.5%-7.0%; I = 0%). An increased risk of mortality was seen in patients receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis (MHRD, 2.1%; 95% CI, 2.0%-2.2%; I = 0%), although this association was no longer found when 1 large study was removed in a sensitivity analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in length of PICU stay between the groups (standardized mean difference, 0.42 days; 95% CI, -0.16 to 1.01 days; I = 89.8%).
Stress ulcer prophylaxis does not show a clear benefit in reducing GI bleeding or length of PICU stay. Observational studies suggest an increased risk of NP and mortality with stress ulcer prophylaxis, which remains to be validated in clinical trials.
确定应激性溃疡预防与胃肠道(GI)出血、医院获得性肺炎(NP)、死亡率和儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院时间的关系。
我们对 2018 年 10 月前在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库中发表的评估质子泵抑制剂和组胺 2 受体拮抗剂对 PICU 患者影响的英文随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。采用随机效应曼-惠特尼风险差(MHRD)模型对所有入选研究进行荟萃分析。主要结局为 GI 出血和 NP 的发生率。次要结局包括死亡率和 PICU 住院时间。
纳入 17 项研究(4 项 RCT 和 13 项观察性研究),共 340763 例患者。总的 GI 出血发生率为 15.2%。应激性溃疡预防状态与 GI 出血风险无差异(MHRD,5.0%;95%CI,-1.0%至 11.0%;I=62%)。与未接受应激性溃疡预防的患者相比,接受应激性溃疡预防的患者 NP 风险增加(MHRD,5.3%;95%CI,3.5%至 7.0%;I=0)。接受应激性溃疡预防的患者死亡率增加(MHRD,2.1%;95%CI,2.0%至 2.2%;I=0),但在敏感性分析排除 1 项大型研究后,这种关联不再存在。两组患者的 PICU 住院时间无统计学差异(标准化均数差,0.42 天;95%CI,-0.16 至 1.01 天;I=89.8%)。
应激性溃疡预防并不能明确减少 GI 出血或 PICU 住院时间。观察性研究表明应激性溃疡预防与 NP 和死亡率增加相关,但仍需临床试验验证。