Luchsinger Larry L, Ransegnola Brett P, Jin Daniel K, Muecksch Frauke, Weisblum Yiska, Bao Weili, George Parakkal Jovvian, Rodriguez Marilis, Tricoche Nancy, Schmidt Fabian, Gao Chengjie, Jawahar Shabnam, Pal Mouli, Schnall Emily, Zhang Huan, Strauss Donna, Yazdanbakhsh Karina, Hillyer Christopher D, Bieniasz Paul D, Hatziioannou Theodora
Laboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA
Laboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Nov 18;58(12). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02005-20.
The development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) following infection or vaccination is likely to be critical for the development of sufficient population immunity to drive cessation of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A large number of serologic tests, platforms, and methodologies are being employed to determine seroprevalence in populations to select convalescent plasma samples for therapeutic trials and to guide policies about reopening. However, the tests have substantial variations in sensitivity and specificity, and their ability to quantitatively predict levels of NAbs is unknown. We collected 370 unique donors enrolled in the New York Blood Center Convalescent Plasma Program between April and May of 2020. We measured levels of antibodies in convalescent plasma samples using commercially available SARS-CoV-2 detection tests and in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and correlated serological measurements with NAb activity measured using pseudotyped virus particles, which offer the most informative assessment of antiviral activity of patient sera against viral infection. Our data show that a large proportion of convalescent plasma samples have modest antibody levels and that commercially available tests have various degrees of accuracy in predicting NAb activity. We found that the Ortho anti-SARS-CoV-2 total Ig and IgG high-throughput serological assays (HTSAs) and the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay quantify levels of antibodies that strongly correlate with the results of NAb assays and are consistent with gold standard ELISA results. These findings provide immediate clinical relevance to serology results that can be equated to NAb activity and could serve as a valuable roadmap to guide the choice and interpretation of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2.
感染或接种疫苗后,针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的中和抗体(NAb)的产生可能对于形成足够的群体免疫力以推动2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的终止至关重要。大量的血清学检测、平台和方法正被用于确定人群中的血清流行率,以选择康复期血浆样本用于治疗试验并指导有关重新开放的政策。然而,这些检测在敏感性和特异性方面存在很大差异,并且它们定量预测中和抗体水平的能力尚不清楚。我们收集了2020年4月至5月期间参加纽约血液中心康复期血浆项目的370名独特捐赠者的样本。我们使用市售的SARS-CoV-2检测试验和内部酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)来测量康复期血浆样本中的抗体水平,并将血清学测量结果与使用假型病毒颗粒测量的中和抗体活性相关联,假型病毒颗粒能提供关于患者血清抗病毒活性的最具信息量的评估。我们的数据表明,很大一部分康复期血浆样本的抗体水平适中,并且市售检测在预测中和抗体活性方面具有不同程度的准确性。我们发现,奥森抗SARS-CoV-2总Ig和IgG高通量血清学检测(HTSA)以及雅培SARS-CoV-2 IgG检测所量化的抗体水平与中和抗体检测结果高度相关,并且与金标准ELISA结果一致。这些发现为可等同于中和抗体活性的血清学结果提供了直接的临床相关性,并可作为指导SARS-CoV-2血清学检测选择和解读的宝贵路线图。