Laboratory of Stem Cell Regenerative Research, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Regeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, NY, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250319. eCollection 2021.
Projections of the stage of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and local, regional and national public health policies to limit coronavirus spread as well as "reopen" cities and states, are best informed by serum neutralizing antibody titers measured by reproducible, high throughput, and statically credible antibody (Ab) assays. To date, a myriad of Ab tests, both available and FDA authorized for emergency, has led to confusion rather than insight per se. The present study reports the results of a rapid, point-in-time 1,000-person cohort study using serial blood donors in the New York City metropolitan area (NYC) using multiple serological tests, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and high throughput serological assays (HTSAs). These were then tested and associated with assays for neutralizing Ab (NAb). Of the 1,000 NYC blood donor samples in late June and early July 2020, 12.1% and 10.9% were seropositive using the Ortho Total Ig and the Abbott IgG HTSA assays, respectively. These serological assays correlated with neutralization activity specific to SARS-CoV-2. The data reported herein suggest that seroconversion in this population occurred in approximately 1 in 8 blood donors from the beginning of the pandemic in NYC (considered March 1, 2020). These findings deviate with an earlier seroprevalence study in NYC showing 13.7% positivity. Collectively however, these data demonstrate that a low number of individuals have serologic evidence of infection during this "first wave" and suggest that the notion of "herd immunity" at rates of ~60% or higher are not near. Furthermore, the data presented herein show that the nature of the Ab-based immunity is not invariably associated with the development of NAb. While the blood donor population may not mimic precisely the NYC population as a whole, rapid assessment of seroprevalence in this cohort and serial reassessment could aid public health decision making.
预测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)大流行的阶段以及限制冠状病毒传播的地方、区域和国家公共卫生政策,以及重新开放城市和州,最好是通过可重复、高通量和具有统计学可信度的抗体(Ab)检测来测量血清中和抗体滴度。迄今为止,大量的 Ab 检测,包括已经获得和紧急授权的 FDA 检测,导致了混乱而不是洞察力。本研究报告了一项快速的、即时的 1000 人队列研究结果,该研究使用来自纽约市大都市区(NYC)的连续献血者,使用多种血清学检测方法,包括酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和高通量血清学检测(HTSA)。然后对这些检测方法进行了测试,并与中和抗体(NAb)检测方法相关联。在 2020 年 6 月底和 7 月初的 1000 名 NYC 献血者样本中,分别有 12.1%和 10.9%的样本使用 Ortho 总 Ig 和 Abbott IgG HTSA 检测呈阳性。这些血清学检测方法与针对 SARS-CoV-2 的中和活性相关。本报告的数据表明,在 NYC 大流行开始时(考虑到 2020 年 3 月 1 日),该人群中大约每 8 名献血者中就有 1 人发生血清转换。这些发现与纽约市早些时候的一项血清流行率研究结果相矛盾,该研究显示阳性率为 13.7%。然而,总的来说,这些数据表明,在这一波“第一波”中,只有少数人有感染的血清学证据,这表明“群体免疫”的概念,即达到 60%或更高的比率,还远未实现。此外,本文提供的数据表明,Ab 为基础的免疫的性质并不总是与 NAb 的发展相关。虽然献血者人群可能不完全模拟整个 NYC 人群,但对该队列的血清流行率进行快速评估和连续重新评估可以帮助公共卫生决策。