Research Division, Institute of Mental Health/Woodbridge Hospital, 10, Buangkok View, 539747, Singapore.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Oct 31;9:92. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-92.
Instruments to measure mental health and well-being are largely developed and often used within Western populations and this compromises their validity in other cultures. A previous qualitative study in Singapore demonstrated the relevance of spiritual and religious practices to mental health, a dimension currently not included in exiting multi-dimensional measures. The objective of this study was to develop a self-administered measure that covers all key and culturally appropriate domains of mental health, which can be applied to compare levels of mental health across different age, gender and ethnic groups. We present the item reduction and validation of the Positive Mental Health (PMH) instrument in a community-based adult sample in Singapore.
Surveys were conducted among adult (21-65 years) residents belonging to Chinese, Malay and Indian ethnicities. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA, CFA) were conducted and items were reduced using item response theory tests (IRT). The final version of the PMH instrument was tested for internal consistency and criterion validity. Items were tested for differential item functioning (DIF) to check if items functioned in the same way across all subgroups.
EFA and CFA identified six first-order factor structure (General coping, Personal growth and autonomy, Spirituality, Interpersonal skills, Emotional support, and Global affect) under one higher-order dimension of Positive Mental Health (RMSEA=0.05, CFI=0.96, TLI=0.96). A 47-item self-administered multi-dimensional instrument with a six-point Likert response scale was constructed. The slope estimates and strength of the relation to the theta for all items in each six PMH subscales were high (range:1.39 to 5.69), suggesting good discrimination properties. The threshold estimates for the instrument ranged from -3.45 to 1.61 indicating that the instrument covers entire spectrums for the six dimensions. The instrument demonstrated high internal consistency and had significant and expected correlations with other well-being measures. Results confirmed absence of DIF.
The PMH instrument is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to measure and compare level of mental health across different age, gender and ethnic groups in Singapore.
用于测量心理健康和幸福感的工具主要是在西方人群中开发和经常使用的,这使得它们在其他文化中的有效性受到影响。之前在新加坡进行的一项定性研究表明,精神和宗教实践与心理健康有关,这是现有多维测量方法中尚未包含的一个维度。本研究的目的是开发一种自我管理的测量工具,涵盖心理健康的所有关键和文化上适当的领域,可用于比较不同年龄、性别和种族群体的心理健康水平。我们展示了在新加坡基于社区的成年样本中,积极心理健康(PMH)工具的项目缩减和验证结果。
对属于华族、马来族和印族的成年(21-65 岁)居民进行了调查。进行了探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA、CFA),并使用项目反应理论测试(IRT)对项目进行了缩减。对 PMH 工具的最终版本进行了内部一致性和标准效度检验。对项目进行了差异项目功能(DIF)检验,以检查项目是否在所有亚组中以相同的方式发挥作用。
EFA 和 CFA 确定了六个一阶因素结构(一般应对、个人成长和自主性、灵性、人际交往技巧、情感支持和整体情感),下有一个积极心理健康的高阶维度(RMSEA=0.05,CFI=0.96,TLI=0.96)。构建了一种 47 项自我管理的多维仪器,采用六点李克特反应量表。所有六个 PMH 子量表中的项目的斜率估计值和与 theta 的关系强度都很高(范围:1.39 至 5.69),表明具有良好的区分度。该仪器的阈值估计值范围为-3.45 至 1.61,表明该仪器涵盖了六个维度的整个范围。该仪器具有较高的内部一致性,并与其他幸福感测量指标具有显著和预期的相关性。结果证实不存在 DIF。
PMH 工具是一种可靠有效的工具,可用于测量和比较新加坡不同年龄、性别和种族群体的心理健康水平。