Uthaikhup Sureeporn, Barbero Marco, Falla Deborah, Sremakaew Munlika, Tanrprawate Surat, Nudsasarn Angkana
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland.
Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3512-3521. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa282.
The primary aim was to quantify and compare the location and extent of pain in people with either episodic migraine, chronic migraine, or cervicogenic headache. A secondary aim was to examine the associations between pain extent and headache features, quality of life, and psychological distress for each headache type.
A cross-sectional, single-site, observational study.
Headache outpatient clinic.
From a sample of 390 patients, 114 patients with migraine or cervicogenic headache (48 episodic migraine, 30 chronic migraine, 36 cervicogenic headache) were eligible for the study.
Pain location and extent were determined using a novel approach for digital pain drawing acquisition and analysis. Headache features included intensity and history duration. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 and psychological distress using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Overall, pain was most frequently reported in the frontal and temporal regions in patients with either episodic or chronic migraine, whereas pain was most frequent in the suboccipital region in patients with cervicogenic headache. A larger pain extent was moderately correlated with higher headache intensity (rs = 0.53, P = 0.003) and poorer quality of life (rs ranged from -0.36 to -0.40, P < 0.05) in patients with chronic migraine, whereas pain extent was associated with longer headache duration in those with cervicogenic headache (rs = 0.35, P = 0.04). No correlation was found between pain extent and psychological features for any headache type (P > 0.05).
Despite some differences, there was a large symptomatic overlap between headache types, highlighting the limitations of using pain location in the differential diagnosis of headache.
主要目的是量化并比较发作性偏头痛、慢性偏头痛或颈源性头痛患者疼痛的部位和范围。次要目的是研究每种头痛类型的疼痛范围与头痛特征、生活质量和心理困扰之间的关联。
一项横断面、单中心观察性研究。
头痛门诊。
从390例患者样本中,114例偏头痛或颈源性头痛患者(48例发作性偏头痛、30例慢性偏头痛、36例颈源性头痛)符合研究条件。
采用一种新型的数字疼痛绘图采集和分析方法确定疼痛部位和范围。头痛特征包括强度和病史持续时间。使用SF-36测量生活质量,使用医院焦虑抑郁量表测量心理困扰。
总体而言,发作性或慢性偏头痛患者最常报告的疼痛部位是额部和颞部,而颈源性头痛患者最常报告的疼痛部位是枕下区域。在慢性偏头痛患者中,较大的疼痛范围与较高的头痛强度(rs = 0.53,P = 0.003)和较差的生活质量(rs范围为-0.36至-0.40,P < 0.05)中度相关,而在颈源性头痛患者中,疼痛范围与较长的头痛持续时间相关(rs = 0.35,P = 0.04)。在任何头痛类型中,均未发现疼痛范围与心理特征之间存在相关性(P > 0.05)。
尽管存在一些差异,但头痛类型之间存在很大的症状重叠,凸显了在头痛鉴别诊断中使用疼痛部位的局限性。