Sociological Studies, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Mar;75(3):251-257. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214501. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
Previous research has identified a relationship between income inequality and child abuse and neglect in the USA. This association has received limited exploration outside the USA.
Administrative data on child protection (CP) in 172 English and Welsh local authorities between 2013 and 2018 were combined with data on deprivation, ethnic density and education from publicly available data sources. Commercial income data were used for Gini coefficient estimation. We tested whether similar evidence for three key findings from a US study could be found in England and Wales. These included whether there was evidence of a relationship between income inequality and child maltreatment, whether this relationship was non-linear and whether this relationship varied dependent on the level of poverty.
There was a significant non-linear relationship between income inequality and state care rates in England and Wales. Predicted state care rates were higher as income inequality increased, up until around average levels where the effect flattens. However, there was no significant relationship for models predicting CP plan/register rates. Income inequality, income deprivation, ethnic density and higher education were able to explain around 75% of the variance in English and Welsh state care rates.
There is some evidence to support the claim of a relationship between income inequality and child maltreatment beyond the USA in England and Wales, and a case for further comparative research, but there are significant limitations in the comparability of data.
先前的研究已经在美国确定了收入不平等与儿童虐待和忽视之间的关系。这种关联在美国以外的地区尚未得到广泛探索。
将 2013 年至 2018 年间 172 个英格兰和威尔士地方当局的儿童保护(CP)行政数据与贫困、族裔密度和教育等公共数据源的数据相结合。基尼系数的估算采用了商业收入数据。我们检验了在英格兰和威尔士是否能够找到美国研究中的三个关键发现的类似证据。这些发现包括收入不平等与儿童虐待之间是否存在关系,这种关系是否呈非线性,以及这种关系是否因贫困程度的不同而有所变化。
在英格兰和威尔士,收入不平等与国家照顾率之间存在显著的非线性关系。随着收入不平等的增加,国家照顾率呈上升趋势,直到平均水平左右,这种效应趋于平稳。然而,对于预测 CP 计划/登记率的模型,没有显著的关系。收入不平等、收入贫困、族裔密度和高等教育能够解释英格兰和威尔士国家照顾率约 75%的方差。
有一些证据支持在美国以外的英格兰和威尔士,收入不平等与儿童虐待之间存在关系的说法,但进一步的比较研究仍有必要,不过数据的可比性存在显著限制。