Griffiths Lucy Jane, Mcgregor Joanna, Pouliou Theodora, Johnson Rhodri D, Broadhurst Karen, Cusworth Linda, North Laura, Ford David V, John Ann
Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, UK.
Centre for Child & Family Justice Research, Lancaster University, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2022 Feb 11;8(2):e47. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.6.
Little is known about mental health problems of children and young people (CYP) involved with public and private law family court proceedings, and how these CYP fare compared to those not involved in these significant disruptions to family life.
This study examined records of depression/anxiety in CYP involved in public and private law proceedings using linked population-level data across Wales.
Retrospective e-cohort study. We calculated the incidence of primary-care-recorded depression/anxiety among CYP involved in these proceedings and in a comparison group, using Poisson regression. Depression/anxiety outcomes following proceedings were evaluated using pairwise Cox regression, with age- and gender-matched controls of CYP who had no involvement with the courts.
CYP in the public group had twice the risk of depression (adjusted incidence rate ratio aIRR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.9-2.6) and 20% higher risk of anxiety (aIRR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.0-1.5) relative to the comparison group. The private group had 60% higher risk of depression (aIRR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.7) and 30% higher risk of anxiety (aIRR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.4). Following private law proceedings, CYP were more likely to have depression (hazard ratio HR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.7-2.1), and anxiety (HR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.6) than the control group. Following public proceedings, CYP were more likely to have depression (HR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.7-2.5). Incidence of anxiety or depression following court proceedings was around 4%.
Findings highlight the vulnerability of CYP involved in family court proceedings and increased risk of depression and anxiety. Schools, health professionals, social and family support workers have a role to play in identifying needs and ensuring CYP receive appropriate support before, during and after proceedings.
对于涉及公法和私法家庭法庭程序的儿童和青少年(CYP)的心理健康问题,以及与未经历这些重大家庭生活变故的儿童和青少年相比,他们的情况如何,我们知之甚少。
本研究利用威尔士的关联人口水平数据,调查参与公法和私法程序的儿童和青少年的抑郁/焦虑记录。
回顾性电子队列研究。我们使用泊松回归计算了参与这些程序的儿童和青少年以及对照组中初级保健记录的抑郁/焦虑发病率。使用成对Cox回归评估程序后的抑郁/焦虑结果,对照组为未参与法庭程序的年龄和性别匹配的儿童和青少年。
与对照组相比,公法组的儿童和青少年患抑郁症的风险高出两倍(调整发病率比aIRR = 2.2;95%置信区间1.9 - 2.6),焦虑风险高出20%(aIRR = 1.2;95%置信区间1.0 - 1.5)。私法组患抑郁症的风险高出60%(aIRR = 1.6;95%置信区间1.4 - 1.7),焦虑风险高出30%(aIRR = 1.3;95%置信区间1.2 - 1.4)。在私法程序之后,儿童和青少年比对照组更有可能患抑郁症(风险比HR = 1.9;95%置信区间1.7 - 2.1)和焦虑症(HR = 1.4;95%置信区间1.2 - 1.6)。在公法程序之后,儿童和青少年更有可能患抑郁症(HR = 2.1;95%置信区间1.7 - 2.5)。法庭程序后的焦虑或抑郁发病率约为4%。
研究结果突出了参与家庭法庭程序的儿童和青少年的脆弱性,以及患抑郁症和焦虑症风险的增加。学校、卫生专业人员、社会和家庭支持工作者在识别需求以及确保儿童和青少年在程序之前、期间和之后获得适当支持方面可以发挥作用。