Departments of Orthopedics.
Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu.
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):458-468. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000291.
Controversy remains over the choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture.
The aim was to compare the risk of complication of neuraxial anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022337384). The study included eligible randomised controlled trials published before February 2022. Data synthesis was performed to compare the differences between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the publication year. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patient age and the anaesthetic technique used. A grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations assessment was performed to assess the quality of each outcome.
Twenty randomised controlled trials and 4802 patients were included. Data synthesis revealed significant higher risk of acute kidney injury in the general anaesthesia group ( P =0.01). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in postoperative short-term mortality ( P =0.34), delirium ( P =0.40), postoperative nausea and vomiting ( P =0.40), cardiac infarction ( P =0.31), acute heart failure ( P =0.34), pulmonary embolism ( P =0.24) and pneumonia ( P =0.15). Subgroup analysis based on patient age and use of sedative medication did not reveal any significant differences. Meta-regression analysis of the publication year versus each adverse event revealed no statistically significant differences.
A significantly higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury was found in patients receiving general anaesthesia. This study revealed no significant differences in terms of postoperative mortality and other complications between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. The results were consistent across the age groups.
对于接受髋关节骨折手术的患者,麻醉技术的选择仍存在争议。
旨在比较全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉在髋关节骨折手术患者中并发症风险。
本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42022337384)进行了注册。研究纳入了截至 2022 年 2 月前发表的合格随机对照试验。对数据进行综合分析,以比较全身麻醉和椎管内麻醉之间的差异。进行了荟萃回归分析,以研究发表年份的影响。基于患者年龄和使用的麻醉技术进行了亚组分析。对每个结局进行了推荐、评估、发展和评估分级评估,以评估每个结局的质量。
纳入了 20 项随机对照试验和 4802 名患者。数据综合分析显示,全身麻醉组急性肾损伤风险显著更高(P=0.01)。两种技术在术后短期死亡率(P=0.34)、谵妄(P=0.40)、术后恶心呕吐(P=0.40)、心肌梗死(P=0.31)、急性心力衰竭(P=0.34)、肺栓塞(P=0.24)和肺炎(P=0.15)方面无显著差异。基于患者年龄和镇静药物使用的亚组分析也未发现任何显著差异。对发表年份与每种不良事件的荟萃回归分析未发现统计学差异。
全身麻醉组术后发生急性肾损伤的风险显著更高。本研究发现全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉在术后死亡率和其他并发症方面无显著差异。结果在各年龄组之间一致。