• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mandibular bone grafts for reconstruction of alveolar clefts.

作者信息

Sindet-Pedersen S, Enemark H

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Jul;46(7):533-7. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(88)90142-5.

DOI:10.1016/0278-2391(88)90142-5
PMID:3292730
Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of mandibular bone grafts for reconstruction of alveolar clefts. The study included 25 patients with cleft lip and alveolar process only and three patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, with a median postoperative follow-up of 8 months (range, 6 to 17 months). The bone grafts were obtained from below the mandibular incisors and canines through an intraoral approach. The marginal bone level achieved was satisfactory in all cases evaluated by occlusal radiographs; the radiographs also demonstrated that the bone grafts were totally integrated after 6 months in all cases. The morphology of the reconstructed alveolar process was satisfactory in all cases evaluated and no periodontal complications were seen. The donor site appeared healed radiologically in all cases 6 months after surgery. The advantages gained by using a mandibular bone graft as compared to an iliac crest graft include reduced morbidity, reduced hospitalization time, reduced operating time, and avoidance of scarring at the donor site. The results of the present study demonstrate that the mandibular symphysis can be used as donor site for reconstruction of small alveolar clefts.

摘要

相似文献

1
Mandibular bone grafts for reconstruction of alveolar clefts.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Jul;46(7):533-7. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(88)90142-5.
2
Reconstruction of alveolar clefts with mandibular or iliac crest bone grafts: a comparative study.下颌骨或髂嵴骨移植修复牙槽嵴裂:一项对比研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Jun;48(6):554-8; discussion 559-60. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80466-5.
3
rhBMP-2 with a demineralized bone matrix scaffold versus autologous iliac crest bone graft for alveolar cleft reconstruction.rhBMP-2 联合脱矿骨基质支架与自体髂嵴骨移植在牙槽裂重建中的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):1107-1115. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865dfb.
4
[Secondary bone grafting in cleft lip and palate].[唇腭裂的二期骨移植]
Harefuah. 2000 Oct;139(7-8):260-3, 327.
5
Mandibular bone graft material for reconstruction of alveolar cleft defects: long-term results.用于牙槽嵴裂缺损重建的下颌骨移植材料:长期结果
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001 Mar;38(2):155-63. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0155_mbgmfr_2.0.co_2.
6
Tibia as donor site for alveolar bone grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate: long-term experience.胫骨作为唇腭裂患者牙槽骨移植供区的长期经验
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001 Mar;35(1):35-42. doi: 10.1080/02844310151032538.
7
A comparison of iliac and cranial bone in secondary grafting of alveolar clefts.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Sep;96(4):789-97; discussion 798-9.
8
Alveolar cleft bone grafts: results and imprecisions of the dental radiograph.牙槽嵴裂植骨术:牙科X线片的结果与不精确性
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Dec;96(7):1534-8.
9
Retrospective analysis of secondary alveolar cleft grafts using iliac of chin bone.使用髂骨或颏骨对继发牙槽嵴裂植骨的回顾性分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Sep;16(5):864-8. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000179742.45424.0a.
10
Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts: a densitometric comparison of iliac crest and tibial bone grafts.牙槽嵴裂的二期骨移植:髂嵴骨移植与胫骨骨移植的骨密度比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001 Jan;38(1):11-4. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0011_sbgoac_2.0.co_2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of symphysis donor site quantity by cone-beam computed tomography and its relation to anterior loop of mental foramen: an observational study.锥形束计算机断层扫描评估耻骨联合供区量及其与颏孔前袢的关系:一项观察性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 28;25(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06242-5.
2
Radiographic Assessment of Different Autogenous Bone Grafts in the Alveolar Cleft: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study.牙槽嵴裂不同自体骨移植的影像学评估:一项回顾性纵向研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01981-w. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
3
Mandibular Ramus Cortical Tenting Graft and Particulate Allograft in the Management of Unilateral Alveolar Cleft.
下颌支皮质撑开移植术与颗粒异体骨移植术治疗单侧牙槽嵴裂
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul-Dec;9(2):355-358. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_96_19.
4
The use of autogeneous mandibular bone block grafts for reconstruction of alveolar defects.使用自体下颌骨块移植修复牙槽骨缺损。
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan-Jun;5(1):71-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.161070.
5
The comparative efficacy of decalcified allogenic bone matrix and intra-oral free osseous autografts in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.脱钙异体骨基质与口腔内游离骨自体移植治疗牙周骨内缺损的疗效比较
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Jan;17(1):91-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.107482.
6
Long-term follow-up of tibial bone graft for correction of alveolar cleft.胫骨骨移植矫正牙槽嵴裂的长期随访
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;2(2):146-52. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.101341.
7
Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study.下颌联合移植与髂骨皮质移植在眼眶爆裂性骨折重建眶底中的比较研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;2(1):24-9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.95312.
8
Evaluation of morbidity associated with iliac crest harvest for alveolar cleft bone grafting.评估用于牙槽嵴裂植骨的髂嵴取骨相关的发病率。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Mar;11(1):91-5. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0249-2. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
9
Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies-USP (HRAC-USP)--part 3: oral and maxillofacial surgery.唇腭裂的康复治疗:巴西圣保罗大学颅面畸形康复医院(HRAC-USP)的经验——第 3 部分:口腔颌面外科。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;20(6):673-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000600014.
10
Secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft of the lip and palate patients.唇腭裂患者的二期牙槽骨植骨术
Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Jul;2(3):146-54. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.86436.