Facilitators and barriers to allyship in academic surgery: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND

Academic health centers have promoted initiatives to improve diversity, equity and inclusion in medicine. Despite this emphasis, there has been limited discussion on practical strategies for navigating bias within academic surgery. This study analyzes experiences of confronting bias within the department of surgery at the University of Michigan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted telephone interviews (n = 15) from January 2019 to January 2020 with surgeon volunteers at one academic institution. Two investigators conducted interviews following a semi-structured guide based on personal experiences with bias between healthcare workers with diverse identities. Interviews were conducted concurrently with thematic coding, coded independently by two investigators, and discussed until consensus was reached. Analysis proceeded following the inductive and comparative approach of interpretive description.

RESULTS

The most common incidents of bias were based on gender and race. They occurred along numerous relationship axes, including physician-patient and resident-faculty. A critical factor in bias response was unambiguously recognizing bias. Responding to bias consists of timing and nature of the response, defined as when the subject responded relative to the incident and the actions done in response to the incident respectively. Barriers to bias response were fear of retribution and extensive energy required to respond. Institutional culture was important, specifically in representation and support from peers and administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study probes deeper into equity and inclusivity in the academic field of surgery, offering insight into common barriers to confronting bias. Overall, these findings offer a basic framework for allies to identify bias and to partner with colleagues to address biases in a supportive manner.