• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用实施科学加强专业心理健康监督:实施前评估与快速定性方法

Using implementation science to enhance specialized mental health supervision: pre-implementation assessment and rapid qualitative methods.

作者信息

Deinse Tonya Van, Waters Allison, Barton Kasey, Bloodworth Sherri, Powell Nicholas

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 325 Pittsboro Street, CB#3550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

Georgia Department of Community Supervision, 2 M.L.K. Jr Dr SE, Atlanta, GA, 30334, USA.

出版信息

BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 24;3(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00174-6.

DOI:10.1186/s44263-025-00174-6
PMID:40556010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12186351/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although implementation science methods have been widely used across all sectors of healthcare, they are less commonly used to promote health interventions within criminal legal system settings. This gap in the research is problematic given the need for effective treatments to address comparatively worse health and mental health outcomes among people involved in the criminal legal system. Additionally, there have been relatively few published studies documenting methods at the pre-implementation phase. This article reports on a pre-implementation assessment conducted as part of a grant-funded initiative with a statewide community supervision agency to address key limitations in the state's Specialized Mental Health Supervision program by piloting two implementation strategies: clinical case consultation and enhancing mental health officers' relationships with behavioral health service providers.

METHODS

The purpose of this study was to provide agency leaders with practical and timely information to make decisions regarding their plan for rolling out the initiative. Within a 30-day timeframe, the research team conducted 22 brief, semi-structured interviews with members of the implementation team and community supervision officers and their supervisors. The team then used rapid qualitative analysis methods to identify potential challenges and facilitators of the implementation strategies and make recommendations to improve implementation.

RESULTS

Although participants indicated that considering mental health symptoms was a top factor in caseload assignment and step-down, they believed other stabilizing factors (e.g., housing, employment) and risk for re-offense should also be considered. Participants described the need for more training on mental health topics and the local service system. Lastly, the agency learned about factors that could impact the consultation process (e.g., trusting the consultant, maintaining a growth mindset) and relationships with behavioral health service providers (e.g., having a common language between community supervision and behavioral health), officer workload, and leadership engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-implementation assessments, including those conducted using rapid analysis methods, should be routine practices when launching an intervention or an implementation strategy under real-world conditions. These assessments provide agencies and their research partners with actionable and tailored information that can enhance the pace and effectiveness of their implementation efforts.

摘要

背景

尽管实施科学方法已在医疗保健的各个领域广泛应用,但在刑事法律系统环境中促进健康干预措施方面的应用却较少。鉴于需要有效的治疗方法来解决刑事法律系统中相关人员相对较差的健康和心理健康结果,这一研究空白存在问题。此外,记录实施前阶段方法的已发表研究相对较少。本文报告了一项实施前评估,该评估是一项由全州社区监督机构资助的倡议的一部分,旨在通过试点两种实施策略来解决该州专门心理健康监督计划中的关键限制:临床病例咨询和加强心理健康官员与行为健康服务提供者的关系。

方法

本研究的目的是为机构领导提供实用且及时的信息,以便他们就推出该倡议的计划做出决策。在30天的时间内,研究团队对实施团队成员、社区监督官员及其主管进行了22次简短的半结构化访谈。然后,研究团队使用快速定性分析方法来确定实施策略的潜在挑战和促进因素,并提出改进实施的建议。

结果

尽管参与者表示,在案件量分配和逐步减少时考虑心理健康症状是一个首要因素,但他们认为还应考虑其他稳定因素(如住房、就业)和再犯罪风险。参与者描述了对更多心理健康主题和当地服务系统培训的需求。最后,该机构了解到可能影响咨询过程的因素(如信任顾问、保持成长心态)以及与行为健康服务提供者的关系(如社区监督和行为健康之间有共同语言)、官员工作量和领导参与度。

结论

实施前评估,包括那些使用快速分析方法进行的评估,在现实世界条件下启动干预或实施策略时应成为常规做法。这些评估为机构及其研究伙伴提供了可操作且量身定制的信息,可加快其实施工作的速度并提高有效性。

相似文献

1
Using implementation science to enhance specialized mental health supervision: pre-implementation assessment and rapid qualitative methods.运用实施科学加强专业心理健康监督:实施前评估与快速定性方法
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 24;3(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00174-6.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from lived experiences to address public health concerns in incarceration and community corrections.从生活经历中学习,以解决监禁和社区矫正中的公共卫生问题。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 20;3(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00192-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Reentry Concerns of Incarcerated Individuals with Severe Mental Illness.探究患有严重精神疾病的被监禁者重新融入社会的担忧。
Community Ment Health J. 2025 May;61(4):704-715. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01389-x. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
2
The Rapid Implementation Feedback (RIF) report: real-time synthesis of qualitative data for proactive implementation planning and tailoring.快速实施反馈(RIF)报告:用于主动实施规划和定制的定性数据实时综合分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jun 21;5(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00605-9.
3
The application of implementation science methods in correctional health intervention research: a systematic review.实施科学方法在惩教健康干预研究中的应用:一项系统综述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 24;4(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00521-4.
4
Carceral epidemiology: mass incarceration and structural racism during the COVID-19 pandemic.监禁流行病学:新冠肺炎大流行期间的大规模监禁和结构性种族主义。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e287-e290. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00005-6.
5
Association of Incarceration With Mortality by Race From a National Longitudinal Cohort Study.一项全国纵向队列研究中按种族划分的监禁与死亡率的关联
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2133083. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33083.
6
A Randomized Trial of Specialty Mental Health Probation: Measuring Implementation and Effectiveness Outcomes.一项专业心理健康缓刑随机试验:衡量实施情况和有效性结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 May;49(3):415-428. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01172-0. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).使用实施研究整合框架(CFIR)进行快速与传统定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5.
8
Use of Rapid Assessment Procedures when analyzing qualitative data in pharmacy research.在药学研究中分析定性数据时使用快速评估程序。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jan;18(1):2249-2253. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
9
Probation Officers' and Supervisors' Perspectives on Critical Resources for Implementing Specialty Mental Health Probation.缓刑官和监督者对实施专业心理健康缓刑的关键资源的看法。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 May;48(3):408-419. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01081-8. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
10
Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature.快速定性研究技术:文献综述的批判性评价。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Aug;30(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.