Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Feb 1;109(2):449-457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
Use of hypofractionated radiation (HR) as a component of breast-conserving treatment (BCT) in breast cancer is relatively low in the United States despite studies demonstrating its efficacy and guidelines supporting its use from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) in 2011 and 2018. Little is known regarding national trends in uptake and factors associated with uptake of HR in the US since the 2011 ASTRO guidelines.
We performed a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2012-2016) on patients undergoing BCT. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify relationships between patient, hospital, and tumor factors with the use of HR or traditional radiation (TR).
A total of 259,342 cases of BCT were identified with 60% (n = 155,447) undergoing TR and 40% (n = 103,895) undergoing HR. There was an increase in use among patients meeting 2011 ASTRO criteria from 26.2% in 2012 to 67.0% in 2016. The odds of use of HR increased with year of diagnosis, patient age, higher median income, private insurance, treatment at an academic center, travel distance to treatment >20 miles, smaller tumors, lymph node-negative disease, and without use of chemotherapy (P values <.0001, Table 1).
Guidelines supporting the use of HR in BCT have been associated with a dramatic increase in use of HR in the US. However, there are substantial, identifiable disparities in the uptake of HR at patient and facility levels. By understanding which patient populations are at risk of not receiving the benefit of this therapy, we can improve our use of HR in the US, potentially leading to reduced health care costs and increased patient satisfaction.
尽管有研究表明其疗效,并得到美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)2011 年和 2018 年的指南支持,但在美国,将低分割放疗(HR)作为保乳治疗(BCT)的一部分的应用相对较低。自 2011 年 ASTRO 指南以来,美国 HR 使用率的国家趋势以及与 HR 使用率相关的因素知之甚少。
我们对国家癌症数据库(2012-2016 年)中接受 BCT 的患者进行了回顾性研究。使用逻辑回归模型来确定患者、医院和肿瘤因素与 HR 或传统放疗(TR)的使用之间的关系。
共确定了 259342 例 BCT 病例,其中 60%(n=155447)接受 TR,40%(n=103895)接受 HR。符合 2011 年 ASTRO 标准的患者使用率从 2012 年的 26.2%增加到 2016 年的 67.0%。HR 使用的可能性随着诊断年份、患者年龄、较高的中位收入、私人保险、在学术中心治疗、治疗距离超过 20 英里、肿瘤较小、淋巴结阴性疾病以及不使用化疗而增加(P 值均<.0001,表 1)。
支持在 BCT 中使用 HR 的指南与美国 HR 使用的急剧增加有关。然而,在患者和医疗机构层面上,HR 的使用率存在明显的、可识别的差异。通过了解哪些患者群体有不能受益于这种治疗的风险,我们可以改善我们在美国对 HR 的使用,从而可能降低医疗保健成本并提高患者满意度。