Saulsberry Loren, Liao Chuanhong, Huo Dezheng
Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;9(9):101568. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101568. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Technology advances in cancer care have paralleled rapidly increasing expenditures in radiation therapy. The use and costs of shorter cancer radiation therapy offer potential utility in clinical practice. We evaluate use and expenditures of Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries receiving hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) compared with conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation (CF-WBI) in the United States and examine the relationship of patient characteristics with HF-WBI use.
We performed a retrospective analysis of radiation therapy in MA beneficiaries using private employer-sponsored insurance claims for a pooled cross-sectional evaluation from 2009 to 2017. The study population included female MA beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation.
A total of 9957 women received HF-WBI, and 18,920 received CF-WBI. Older age, greater distance from home to treatment facility, and a higher proportion of college graduates in the community of residence were associated with increased HF-WBI use. Mean insurer-paid radiation therapy expenditures were significantly lower for HF-WBI versus CF-WBI (adjusted difference, $4113; 95% CI, $4030-$4,197). Mean patient out-of-pocket expenditure for HF-WBI was $426 less than that of CF-WBI. Across US states, geographic variation existed in the ratio of costs for HF-WBI relative to CF-WBI (range, 0.41-0.87).
HF-WBI use among MA beneficiaries with breast cancer has dramatically increased over time, surpassing CF-HBI as the dominant form of radiation therapy. HF-WBI clinical adoption has outpaced any continual cost decrease, despite wide variation across US states for this shorter radiation therapy treatment. As MA enrollment continues to expand, identifying the drivers of HF-WBI use and the sources of variation in costs of HF-WBI will help direct the quality of cancer care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.
癌症治疗技术的进步与放射治疗费用的迅速增加同步。缩短癌症放射治疗的使用和成本在临床实践中具有潜在效用。我们评估了美国医疗保险优势(MA)受益人中接受大分割全乳照射(HF-WBI)与常规分割全乳照射(CF-WBI)的使用情况和支出,并研究了患者特征与HF-WBI使用之间的关系。
我们使用2009年至2017年私人雇主赞助保险索赔对MA受益人进行放射治疗的回顾性分析,以进行汇总横断面评估。研究人群包括接受保乳手术和全乳照射治疗的早期乳腺癌女性MA受益人。
共有9957名女性接受了HF-WBI,18920名接受了CF-WBI。年龄较大、住所到治疗机构的距离较远以及居住社区中大学毕业生比例较高与HF-WBI使用增加相关。HF-WBI的平均保险公司支付的放射治疗费用明显低于CF-WBI(调整差异为4113美元;95%CI,4030美元至4197美元)。HF-WBI的平均患者自付费用比CF-WBI少426美元。在美国各州,HF-WBI与CF-WBI的成本比存在地理差异(范围为0.41至0.87)。
随着时间的推移,MA乳腺癌受益人中HF-WBI的使用显著增加,超过CF-HBI成为放射治疗的主要形式。尽管这种较短的放射治疗在美国各州存在很大差异,但HF-WBI在临床中的采用速度超过了成本的持续下降。随着MA参保人数的持续增加,确定HF-WBI使用的驱动因素和HF-WBI成本差异的来源将有助于指导为医疗保险受益人提供的癌症护理质量。