• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织创伤护理检查表的实施:对使用的促进因素和障碍的定性分析

Implementation of the WHO Trauma Care Checklist: A qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers to use.

作者信息

Wild Hannah, Mock Charles, Lim Andrew

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.050
PMID:32931975
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) Trauma Care Checklist (TCC) has been documented to improve care of the injured. Factors that promote TCC use have not been well evaluated. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators affecting TCC use.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted by interviewing regional leaders and health care providers at hospitals where the initial WHO TCC pilot study had been conducted in 2010-2012. Study participants included trauma system directors, surgeons, emergency medicine physicians, nurses, and house staff in nine countries. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed in Dedoose software using deductive and inductive coding strategies incorporating elements of grounded theory.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants representing nine of the 11 original pilot sites were interviewed, including 14 doctors and four nurses. Participants represented departments of trauma/trauma surgery (n = 13) and emergency medicine (n = 5). Three sites continued to use the TCC in a nearly original form; three sites used a significantly modified version; and the remaining three sites no longer used it. The most commonly identified facilitator of TCC use was endorsement at both the front-line provider and institutional/leadership level (n = 7). Personnel-related issues and resistance from individual providers were the most commonly identified barriers (n = 10).

CONCLUSION

Presence of an institutional champion, context-specific adaptation, and integration of the TCC with existing care and documentation practices contribute to successful utilization. Personnel constraints such as revolving trainees and resistance from individual providers hinder utilization. To improve TCC uptake, participants also recommended that TCC be more closely integrated with courses such as Advanced Trauma Life Support.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)创伤护理检查表(TCC)已被证明可改善对伤者的护理。促进TCC使用的因素尚未得到充分评估。我们试图确定影响TCC使用的障碍和促进因素。

方法

通过采访2010 - 2012年进行WHO首次TCC试点研究的医院的地区负责人和医疗服务提供者进行了一项定性研究。研究参与者包括九个国家的创伤系统主任、外科医生、急诊医学医生、护士和住院医生。使用Dedoose软件,采用结合扎根理论要素的演绎和归纳编码策略,对访谈记录进行了主题分析。

结果

对代表11个原始试点地点中9个地点的18名参与者进行了访谈,包括14名医生和4名护士。参与者来自创伤/创伤外科(n = 13)和急诊医学(n = 5)科室。三个地点继续以近乎原始的形式使用TCC;三个地点使用了大幅修改的版本;其余三个地点不再使用。最常被确定的TCC使用促进因素是一线提供者和机构/领导层面的认可(n = 7)。与人员相关的问题和个别提供者的抵制是最常被确定的障碍(n = 10)。

结论

机构支持者的存在、因地制宜的调整以及TCC与现有护理和记录实践的整合有助于成功使用。人员限制,如轮转实习生和个别提供者的抵制,阻碍了使用。为了提高TCC的采用率,参与者还建议将TCC与高级创伤生命支持等课程更紧密地整合。

相似文献

1
Implementation of the WHO Trauma Care Checklist: A qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers to use.世界卫生组织创伤护理检查表的实施:对使用的促进因素和障碍的定性分析
Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
An Invited Commentary on "Implementation of the WHO Trauma Care Checklist a qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers to use".
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3
A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".对英格兰各医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍和促进因素的定性评估:“手术核对表实施项目”的经验教训
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):81-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000793.
4
Perceptions of rounding checklists in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study.在重症监护病房中对查房核对清单的认知:一项定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):836-843. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007218. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Facilitators and barriers in pain management for trauma patients in the chain of emergency care.创伤患者在急救护理链中疼痛管理的促进因素和障碍。
Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.029. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
6
Barriers to and facilitators of the development and utilization of context appropriate evidence based clinical algorithms to optimize clinical care and patient outcomes in the Tikur Anbessa emergency department: a multi-component qualitative study.提库尔·安贝萨急诊科中,开发和应用适合具体情境的循证临床算法以优化临床护理和患者结局的障碍与促进因素:一项多成分定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4008-2.
7
Healthcare Clinician and Staff Perspectives on Facilitators and Barriers to Ideal Sexual Health Care to High-Risk Depressed Young Women: A Qualitative Study of Diverse Clinic Systems.医疗保健临床医生和工作人员对为高风险抑郁年轻女性提供理想性健康护理的促进因素和障碍的看法:对不同诊所系统的定性研究
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug;33(4):363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
8
An Invited Commentary on "Implementation of the WHO trauma care checklist a qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers to use" [Int. J. Surg. 83 (2020) 15-23].
Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:194-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.09.045. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing trauma registries in low- and middle-income countries: Qualitative experiences from Tanzania.低收入和中等收入国家实施创伤登记的障碍与促进因素:来自坦桑尼亚的定性经验
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 1):S23-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
The Tanzanian trauma patients' prehospital experience: a qualitative interview-based study.坦桑尼亚创伤患者的院前经历:一项基于定性访谈的研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 27;5(4):e006921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006921.

引用本文的文献

1
Synthesizing the Evidence Base to Enhance Coordination between Humanitarian Mine Action and Emergency Care for Casualties of Explosive Ordnance and Explosive Weapons: A Scoping Review.综合证据库以加强人道主义排雷行动与爆炸物及爆炸武器伤亡人员紧急护理之间的协调:范围审查
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Dec;39(6):421-435. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X24000669. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
2
Design and psychometric properties of the acute care quality in trauma emergency units scale.创伤急救单元急性护理质量量表的设计及心理计量学特性。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Apr;50(2):447-453. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02360-3. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Operative Trauma Courses: A Scoping Review to Inform the Development of a Trauma Surgery Course for Low-Resource Settings.
手术创伤课程:范围综述,为资源匮乏环境下创伤外科课程的发展提供信息。
World J Surg. 2023 Jul;47(7):1662-1683. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06985-8. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
4
Facilitators and barriers impacting in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) implementation across country income levels: a scoping review.在不同国家收入水平下,影响创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e068219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219.