Giannelou Polina, Simopoulou Mara, Grigoriadis Sokratis, Makrakis Evangelos, Kontogeorgi Adamantia, Pantou Agni, Galatis Dionysios, Kalampokas Theodoros, Bakas Panagiotis, Bolaris Stamatis, Pantos Konstantinos, Sfakianoudis Konstantinos
Department of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Centre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, 14-16, Papanikoli, 15232 Athens, Greece.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 11;10(9):687. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090687.
Despite recent striking advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosis and treatment is still considered challenging. Poor responders constitute a heterogeneous cohort with the common denominator of under-responding to controlled ovarian stimulation. Inevitably, respective success rates are significantly compromised. As POR pathophysiology entails the elusive factor of compromised ovarian function, both diagnosis and management fuel an ongoing heated debate depicted in the literature. From the criteria employed for diagnosis to the plethora of strategies and adjuvant therapies proposed, the conundrum of POR still puzzles the practitioner. What is more, novel treatment approaches from stem cell therapy and platelet-rich plasma intra-ovarian infusion to mitochondrial replacement therapy have emerged, albeit not claiming clinical routine status yet. The complex and time sensitive nature of this subgroup of infertile patients indicates the demand for a consensus on a horizontally accepted definition, diagnosis and subsequent effective treating strategy. This critical review analyzes the standing criteria employed in order to diagnose and aptly categorize POR patients, while it proceeds to critically evaluate current and novel strategies regarding their management. Discrepancies in diagnosis and respective implications are discussed, while the existing diversity in management options highlights the need for individualized management.
尽管辅助生殖技术(ART)近年来取得了显著进展,但对卵巢低反应(POR)的诊断和治疗仍被认为具有挑战性。卵巢低反应者是一个异质性群体,其共同特征是对控制性卵巢刺激反应不足。不可避免地,各自的成功率会受到显著影响。由于POR的病理生理学涉及卵巢功能受损这一难以捉摸的因素,其诊断和管理在文献中引发了持续激烈的争论。从用于诊断的标准到提出的众多策略和辅助治疗方法,POR的难题仍然困扰着从业者。此外,从干细胞治疗、富血小板血浆卵巢内注射到线粒体替代疗法等新型治疗方法已经出现,尽管尚未声称具有临床常规地位。这类不孕患者群体的复杂性和时间敏感性表明,需要就横向认可的定义、诊断及后续有效治疗策略达成共识。这篇批判性综述分析了用于诊断和恰当分类POR患者的现有标准,同时对当前及新型管理策略进行了批判性评估。讨论了诊断中的差异及其各自的影响,而现有管理方案的多样性凸显了个体化管理的必要性。