Arensman Remco M, Geelen Rianne H, Koppenaal Tjarco, Veenhof Cindy, Pisters Martijn F
Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Physiotherapy Research, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Jul;38(7):928-937. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1818337. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
To develop an instrument to measure adherence to frequency, intensity, and quality of performance of home-based exercise (HBE) programs recommended by a physical therapist and to evaluate its construct validity and reliability in patients with low back pain.
The Exercise Adherence Scale (EXAS) was developed following a literature search, an expert panel review, and a pilot test. The construct validity of the EXAS was determined based on data from 27 participants through an investigation of the convergent validity between adherence, lack of time to exercise, and lack of motivation to exercise. Associations between adherence, pain, and disability were determined to test divergent validity. The reliability of the EXAS quality of performance score was assessed using video recordings from 50 participants performing four exercises.
Correlations between the EXAS and lack of time to exercise, lack of motivation to exercise, pain, and disability were rho = 0.47, rho = 0.48, rho = 0.005, and rho = 0.24, respectively. The intrarater reliability of the quality of performance score was Kappa quadratic weights (K) = 0.87 (95%-CI 0.83-0.92). The interrater reliability was K = 0.36 (95%-CI 0.27-0.45).
The EXAS demonstrates acceptable construct validity for the measurement of adherence to HBE programs. Additionally, the EXAS shows excellent intrarater reliability and poor interrater reliability for the quality of performance score and is the first instrument to measure adherence to frequency, intensity, and quality of performance of HBE programs. The EXAS allows researchers and clinicians to better investigate the effects of adherence to HBE programs on the outcomes of interventions and treatments.
开发一种工具,用于测量对物理治疗师推荐的家庭锻炼(HBE)计划的频率、强度和表现质量的依从性,并评估其在腰痛患者中的结构效度和信度。
通过文献检索、专家小组审查和预试验开发了锻炼依从性量表(EXAS)。基于27名参与者的数据,通过调查依从性、缺乏锻炼时间和缺乏锻炼动机之间的收敛效度来确定EXAS的结构效度。确定依从性、疼痛和残疾之间的关联以测试区分效度。使用50名参与者进行四项锻炼的视频记录评估EXAS表现质量评分的信度。
EXAS与缺乏锻炼时间、缺乏锻炼动机、疼痛和残疾之间的相关性分别为rho = 0.47、rho = 0.48、rho = 0.005和rho = 0.24。表现质量评分的评分者内信度为Kappa二次权重(K)= 0.87(95%置信区间0.83 - 0.92)。评分者间信度为K = 0.36(95%置信区间0.27 - 0.45)。
EXAS在测量对HBE计划的依从性方面表现出可接受的结构效度。此外,EXAS在表现质量评分方面显示出出色的评分者内信度和较差的评分者间信度,并且是第一种测量对HBE计划的频率、强度和表现质量的依从性的工具。EXAS使研究人员和临床医生能够更好地研究坚持HBE计划对干预和治疗结果的影响。