• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你拥有控制权:用于手术关键安全时刻的航空通信应用程序。

You Have Control: aviation communication application for safety-critical times in surgery.

作者信息

Hardie J A, Oeppen R S, Shaw G, Holden C, Tayler N, Brennan P A

机构信息

Trauma & Orthopaedic Department, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, GU16 7UJ, UK.

Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Nov;58(9):1073-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.104. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.104
PMID:32933788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7449978/
Abstract

High-risk organisations (HRO), including aviation, undergo formal communication training, with emphasis on safety-critical moments. Such training is not widespread or mandatory in healthcare, and while there are many differences both share the 'human element' with circumstances leading to an increased risk of harm. A typical operating theatre consists of an operating surgeon, and an assisting surgeon, roles that may change throughout the course of a procedure. Similarly, a training aircraft or multi-crew cockpit (flight deck) has a pilot in control, or 'pilot flying', and a 'pilot not flying'. Both interact with wider teams, for example the scrub team and air traffic controllers, respectively. Surgical error is the second most prevalent cause of preventable harm to patients after drug errors. Every year in the UK National Health Service (NHS), there are typically 500 never events, 21,000 serious incidents, and many more episodes of physical or psychological harm. Ineffective communication (46%) is the most common behavioural factor leading to a never event. In this review, we examine the concept of 'sterile cockpit', use of unambiguous terminology, callsigns, important information readback, sharing of mental models, and the mini-brief, and how these may be used to reduce patient harm during safety-critical moments.

摘要

包括航空业在内的高风险组织(HRO)会接受正式的沟通培训,重点是安全关键时刻。此类培训在医疗保健领域并不普遍,也不是强制性的,尽管两者存在许多差异,但在导致伤害风险增加的情况下都存在“人为因素”。一个典型的手术室由一名主刀外科医生和一名助手组成,这些角色在手术过程中可能会发生变化。同样,一架训练用飞机或多机组驾驶舱(驾驶舱)有一名负责操控的飞行员,即“操控飞行员”,以及一名“非操控飞行员”。两者分别与更广泛的团队互动,例如刷手团队和空中交通管制员。手术失误是继用药失误之后导致患者可预防伤害的第二大常见原因。在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中,每年通常会发生500起严重可避免事件、21000起严重事故,以及更多身体或心理伤害事件。无效沟通(46%)是导致严重可避免事件的最常见行为因素。在本综述中,我们探讨了“无菌驾驶舱”的概念、明确术语的使用、呼号、重要信息复述、心理模型共享以及简短预沟通,以及这些如何用于在安全关键时刻减少患者伤害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d410/7449978/2d0d73de170a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d410/7449978/2d0d73de170a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d410/7449978/2d0d73de170a/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
You Have Control: aviation communication application for safety-critical times in surgery.你拥有控制权:用于手术关键安全时刻的航空通信应用程序。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Nov;58(9):1073-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.104. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Lessons from aviation safety: pilot monitoring, the sterile flight deck rule, and aviation-style computerised checklists in the operating room.航空安全的启示:飞行员监控、无菌飞行甲板规则以及手术室中的航空式计算机化检查表。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;131(5):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Leading article: What has an Airbus A380 Captain got to do with OMFS? Lessons from aviation to improve patient safety.社论:空客A380机长与口腔颌面外科有什么关系?从航空领域汲取的经验教训以提高患者安全。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;57(5):407-411. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
The personal limitations checklist: human factors insights from air accidents to reduce intraoperative harm.个人局限性清单:从航空事故中获得的人为因素见解以减少术中伤害。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Oct;59(8):853-857. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.12.007. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Applying aviation factors to oral and maxillofacial surgery--the human element.将航空因素应用于口腔颌面外科——人为因素。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;51(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.024. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
6
Surgical specimen handover from the operating theatre to laboratory-Can we improve patient safety by learning from aviation and other high-risk organisations?手术标本从手术室向实验室交接-我们能否通过向航空和其他高风险组织学习来提高患者安全性?
J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 Feb;47(2):117-120. doi: 10.1111/jop.12614. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
7
Fighting human error : what surgeons can learn from aviators.对抗人为失误:外科医生能从飞行员身上学到什么。
Acta Chir Belg. 2014 Jul-Aug;114(4):228-32.
8
Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety.航空与医疗保健:对患者安全影响的比较性综述。
JRSM Open. 2015 Dec 2;7(1):2054270415616548. doi: 10.1177/2054270415616548. eCollection 2016 Jan.
9
Parallels in safety between aviation and healthcare.航空与医疗保健在安全方面的相似之处。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):875-878. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Human factors in aircraft incidents: results of a 7-year study.飞机事故中的人为因素:一项为期7年的研究结果
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 Oct;55(10):960-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse understaffing associated with adverse outcomes for surgical admissions.护士人手不足与手术入院的不良后果有关。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae215.
2
Non-technical skills and teamwork in trauma: from the emergency department to the operating room.创伤中的非技术技能与团队协作:从急诊科到手术室
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 5;10:1319990. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1319990. eCollection 2023.
3
Human factors application for healthcare teams in low- and medium-income countries (LMIC) to help improve patient safety and performance.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical tracheostomies in Covid-19 patients: important considerations and the "5Ts" of safety.新冠病毒肺炎患者的外科气管切开术:重要考量因素及安全“五要素”
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;58(5):585-589. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Operating during the COVID-19 pandemic: How to reduce medical error.在新冠疫情期间开展手术:如何减少医疗差错。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;58(5):577-580. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
Wrong tooth extraction: further analysis of "never event" data.
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的医疗团队中应用人为因素,以帮助提高患者安全和医疗表现。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Jan-Feb;12(1):77-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
4
[Competence and communication in the implementation of computer-assisted surgical planning].[计算机辅助手术规划实施中的能力与沟通]
Chirurg. 2021 Mar;92(3):194-199. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01348-8. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
错误拔牙:“绝不允许发生的事件”数据的进一步分析
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Nov;57(9):932-934. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健环境中可预防的患者伤害的发生率、严重程度和性质:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185.
5
Concerns About Verbal Communication in the Operating Room: A Field Study.手术室口头沟通问题研究:一项实地研究
Hum Factors. 2020 Sep;62(6):940-953. doi: 10.1177/0018720819858274. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
Meditation music improved the quality of suturing in an experimental bypass procedure.冥想音乐改善了实验性旁路手术中的缝合质量。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Aug;161(8):1515-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03976-4. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
7
Aviation-based teamwork skills work for surgeons: time for an 'aviation bundle'?基于航空领域的团队协作技能对外科医生有用:是时候推出“航空综合措施”了吗?
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Dec;88(12):1231-1235. doi: 10.1111/ans.14892. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Mad as a hatter? Evaluating doctors' recall of names in theatres and attitudes towards adopting #theatrecapchallenge.像帽商一样疯狂?评估医生对手术室中名字的记忆以及对接受#手术室回顾挑战的态度。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;121(4):984-986. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
9
Challenging hierarchy in healthcare teams - ways to flatten gradients to improve teamwork and patient care.挑战医疗团队中的等级制度——消除差距以改善团队协作和患者护理的方法。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;55(5):449-453. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
10
Development and implementation of non-medical practitioners in acute care.非医学从业者在急性护理中的发展与实施。
Br J Nurs. 2016 Nov 10;25(20):1129-1134. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.20.1129.