Goudra Basavana, Singh Preet Mohinder
Clinical Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 680 Dulles, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO, USA.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):349-354. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_813_19. Epub 2020 May 30.
Providing sedation to patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is a controversial and emotive issue. The mainstay of sedation is propofol, whose administration is within the sole jurisdiction of anesthesia providers, at least in the USA. Attempts have been made to seize the authority by the GI community. One of the first attempts was the use of the prodrug of propofol -fospropofol. However, as the drug has a similar adverse effect profile as propofol in terms of respiratory depression, the FDA did not approve its use by providers other than those trained in airway management. Sedasys was the next attempt, which was a computer-assisted personalized sedation system. As a result of insufficient sedation that could be provided with the device, although very successful in research settings, it was not a commercial success. It seems that remimazolam is the next effort in this direction. It is likely to fail in this regard unless its respiratory depressant properties and failure rates could be addressed. G protein-biased μ-receptor agonists are a new class of opioids exhibiting analgesic properties similar to morphine without equivalent respiratory depressant properties. Oliceridine is the prototype. As a result, the drug can be additive to midazolam or remimazolam and allow screening colonoscopy to be comfortably completed without the need for propofol. For an anesthesia provider, the administration of oliceridine can eliminate the need for drugs such as fentanyl that add to the respiratory depressant properties of propofol. As a result, oliceridine has the potential to render the sedation for GI endoscopy procedures both safe and cost-effective.
为接受胃肠道(GI)内镜检查的患者提供镇静是一个有争议且情绪化的问题。镇静的主要药物是丙泊酚,至少在美国,其给药仅由麻醉医护人员负责。胃肠病学界曾试图夺取这一权力。最初的尝试之一是使用丙泊酚的前体药物——磷丙泊酚。然而,由于该药物在呼吸抑制方面与丙泊酚有相似的不良反应,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)未批准非气道管理培训人员使用。接下来的尝试是Sedasys,它是一种计算机辅助的个性化镇静系统。尽管在研究环境中非常成功,但由于该设备所能提供的镇静不足,它在商业上并不成功。瑞马唑仑似乎是这一方向的下一个努力。除非其呼吸抑制特性和失败率能够得到解决,否则在这方面可能会失败。G蛋白偏向性μ受体激动剂是一类新型阿片类药物,具有与吗啡相似的镇痛特性,但没有同等的呼吸抑制特性。奥利替丁是其原型。因此,该药物可与咪达唑仑或瑞马唑仑相加,使筛查结肠镜检查能够在无需丙泊酚的情况下舒适地完成。对于麻醉医护人员来说,使用奥利替丁可以消除对芬太尼等会增加丙泊酚呼吸抑制特性的药物的需求。因此,奥利替丁有潜力使胃肠道内镜检查的镇静既安全又经济有效。