Schumann Roman, Silberman Edward K, Hotin Heidi M, Quraishi Sadeq A
Professor of Anesthesiology, Professor of Surgery (Sec), Tufts University School of Medicine, Associate Chief of Anesthesia for Research and Development, VA Boston Healthcare System, Department Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, 1400 VFW Parkway, West Roxbury, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, USA.
Professor of Psychiatry, Tufts University School of Medicine, Director of Inpatient Services, Tufts Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, USA.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):378-382. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_455_20. Epub 2020 May 30.
Necessary procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic include electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Providing ECT has been considered an essential service during COVID-19 in the Singapore healthcare system, not least to contribute to disease control within a society in part due to the nature of the ECT patient population. There is limited evidence-based scientific information available regarding a procedural framework for ECT during a respiratory pandemic, when much attention in the healthcare system is focused on different areas of clinical care. This article attempts to describe such a framework for ECT procedures acknowledging limited solid scientific evidence at this time and being mindful of future changes to these suggestions as testing, immunization, and treatment options develop. This approach can be adopted in whole or in part to assist practitioners to protect the patient and themselves during the procedure.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的必要程序包括电休克治疗(ECT)。在新加坡医疗系统中,提供电休克治疗在2019冠状病毒病期间被视为一项基本服务,这在一定程度上是由于电休克治疗患者群体的性质有助于社会内的疾病控制。在呼吸道大流行期间,当医疗系统的大部分注意力集中在临床护理的不同领域时,关于电休克治疗程序框架的循证科学信息有限。本文试图描述这样一个电休克治疗程序框架,承认目前确凿的科学证据有限,并考虑到随着检测、免疫和治疗选择的发展,这些建议未来可能发生的变化。此方法可全部或部分采用,以协助从业者在治疗过程中保护患者和他们自己。