Daniels Steven P, Mankowski Gettle Lori, Blankenbaker Donna G, Lee Kenneth S, Ross Andrew B
Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Heath, 660 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 E. Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Skeletal Radiol. 2021 Apr;50(4):673-681. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03604-8. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
To present our experience with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-guided musculoskeletal soft tissue biopsies in a busy interventional clinic.
After IRB approval was obtained and informed consent was waived, we retrospectively reviewed all CEUS-guided musculoskeletal biopsies performed from December 1, 2018 to March 2, 2020. Relevant pre-procedure imaging was reviewed. Number of samples, suspected necrosis on pre-procedure imaging, specimen adequacy for pathologic analysis, correlation with pathologic diagnosis of surgical resection specimens, and procedural complications were recorded.
Thirty-six CEUS-guided musculoskeletal biopsies were performed in 32 patients (mean age 57, range 26-88; 22 males, 10 females). All procedures were performed using 16-gauge biopsy needles, and all procedures provided adequate samples for pathologic analysis as per the final pathology report. Between two and seven core specimens were obtained (mean 3.7). In 30/36 cases (83%), a contrast-enhanced MRI was obtained prior to biopsy, and 10/30 (33%) of these cases showed imaging features suspicious for necrosis. In 15/36 cases, surgical resection was performed, and the core biopsy and surgical resection specimens were concordant in 14/15 cases (93%). One patient noted transient leg discomfort at the time of microbubble bursting. Otherwise, no adverse reactions or procedural complications were observed.
CEUS is an accurate way to safely target representative areas of soft tissue lesions for biopsy and can be implemented in a busy interventional clinic. Our early experience has shown this to be a promising technique, especially in targeting representative areas of heterogeneous lesions and lesions with areas of suspected necrosis on prior imaging.
介绍我们在繁忙的介入诊所中使用超声造影(CEUS)引导进行肌肉骨骼软组织活检的经验。
在获得机构审查委员会(IRB)批准并豁免知情同意后,我们回顾性分析了2018年12月1日至2020年3月2日期间所有在CEUS引导下进行的肌肉骨骼活检。回顾了相关的术前影像。记录样本数量、术前影像上可疑的坏死情况、病理分析的标本充足性、与手术切除标本病理诊断的相关性以及手术并发症。
对32例患者(平均年龄57岁,范围26 - 88岁;男性22例,女性10例)进行了36次CEUS引导下的肌肉骨骼活检。所有操作均使用16号活检针,根据最终病理报告,所有操作均提供了足够的标本用于病理分析。获取了2至7个核心标本(平均3.7个)。在36例中的30例(83%)中,活检前进行了增强MRI检查,其中10/30例(33%)显示有可疑坏死的影像特征。在36例中的15例中进行了手术切除,14/15例(93%)的核心活检和手术切除标本结果一致。1例患者在微泡破裂时出现短暂的腿部不适。除此之外,未观察到不良反应或手术并发症。
CEUS是一种安全地针对软组织病变代表性区域进行活检的准确方法,可在繁忙的介入诊所中实施。我们的早期经验表明这是一种有前景的技术,尤其适用于针对异质性病变的代表性区域以及术前影像上有可疑坏死区域的病变。