School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Mar;46(3):1115-1128. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02734-w. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
To determine the diagnostic performance of mean ADC values in the characterization of endometrial carcinoma (EC) from benign lesions by systematic review of the literature and performing meta-analysis. A systematic search of major electronic bibliographic databases was performed to find studies that used ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the search results and then by reading the full texts selected the pertinent studies for final analyses. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were created. Between-study heterogeneity was measured using I squared (I) index. Eleven studies including 269 ECs and 208 benign lesions were analyzed. Pooled average (95% CI) ADC in EC and benign lesions groups were, respectively, 0.82 (0.77-0.87) × 10 mm/s and 1.41 (1.29-1.52) × 10 mm/s. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions were 93% (87-96%; I = 41.19%) and 94% (88-97%; I = 46.91%), respectively. The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC curve was 98% (96-99%). ADC values had good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating EC from benign lesions. In order to recommend ADC measurement for detecting endometrial lesions in routine clinical practice, more primary studies, especially trials and comparative studies including hysteroscopically-guided biopsy method, with larger sample sizes are still required.
通过系统评价文献并进行荟萃分析,确定平均 ADC 值在鉴别子宫内膜癌(EC)与良性病变中的诊断性能。方法:系统检索主要电子文献数据库,以寻找使用 ADC 值鉴别 EC 与良性病变的研究。两名审查员独立筛选检索结果的标题和摘要,然后通过阅读全文选择相关研究进行最终分析。使用双变量随机效应模型,汇总敏感性和特异性值及其 95%置信区间(CI)。绘制汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)。使用 I 平方(I)指数测量研究间异质性。结果:共纳入 11 项研究,包括 269 例 EC 和 208 例良性病变。EC 和良性病变组的平均 ADC 值(95%CI)分别为 0.82(0.77-0.87)×10 mm/s 和 1.41(1.29-1.52)×10 mm/s。平均 ADC 值鉴别 EC 与良性病变的合并(95%CI)敏感性和特异性分别为 93%(87-96%;I=41.19%)和 94%(88-97%;I=46.91%)。SROC 曲线的 AUC(95%CI)为 98%(96-99%)。结论:ADC 值在鉴别 EC 与良性病变方面具有良好的诊断准确性。为了在常规临床实践中推荐 ADC 测量用于检测子宫内膜病变,仍需要更多的原始研究,特别是包括宫腔镜引导活检方法的试验和比较研究,以及更大的样本量。