• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗保健领域将EQ-5D用于随访、决策制定及质量改进——以瑞典国家质量登记处为例

Collection and use of EQ-5D for follow-up, decision-making, and quality improvement in health care - the case of the Swedish National Quality Registries.

作者信息

Ernstsson Olivia, Janssen Mathieu F, Heintz Emelie

机构信息

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Sep 16;4(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00231-8.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-020-00231-8
PMID:32936347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7494720/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Swedish National Quality Registries (NQRs) contain individual-level health care data for specific patient populations, or patients receiving specific interventions. Approximately 90% of the 105 Swedish NQRs include any patient-reported outcome measure, with EQ-5D being the most common. As there has been no general overview of EQ-5D data within the NQRs, this study fills a knowledge gap by reporting how the data are collected, presented, and used at different levels of the Swedish health care system.

METHODS

All 46 NQRs with a license for the use of EQ-5D were included. Information was retrieved from the registries' annual reports or from websites, using a template that was subsequently sent to each registry for completion and confirmation. If considered necessary, the contact was followed-up with an interview, either in-person or over the telephone. The uses of EQ-5D were categorised as denoting usage for follow-up, decision-making, or quality improvement in Swedish health care.

RESULTS

In total, 41 of the 46 licensed registries reported collection of EQ-5D data. EQ-5D is most commonly collected within registries related to the musculoskeletal system, but it has a wide application also in other disease areas. Thirty-six registries provide EQ-5D results to patients, clinicians, or other decision-makers. Twenty-two of the registries reported that EQ-5D data are being used for follow-up, decision-making or quality improvement. The registries most commonly reported use of data for assessing interventions, and in quality indicators to follow-up the quality of care at a national level.

CONCLUSION

Collection and use of EQ-5D data vary across the Swedish NQRs, which may partly be accounted for by the different purposes of the registries. The provided examples of use illustrate how EQ-5D data can inform decisions at different levels of the health care system. However, there is potential for improving the use of EQ-5D data.

摘要

背景

瑞典国家质量登记处(NQRs)包含特定患者群体或接受特定干预措施患者的个体层面医疗保健数据。瑞典105个NQRs中约90%包含患者报告的结局指标,其中EQ-5D最为常见。由于此前没有对NQRs中的EQ-5D数据进行全面概述,本研究通过报告瑞典医疗保健系统不同层面的数据收集、呈现和使用方式,填补了这一知识空白。

方法

纳入所有46个获得使用EQ-5D许可的NQRs。信息从登记处的年度报告或网站获取,使用模板随后发送给每个登记处以供填写和确认。如有必要,通过面对面或电话访谈进行跟进。EQ-5D的用途分为用于瑞典医疗保健的随访、决策或质量改进。

结果

46个获得许可的登记处中,共有41个报告收集了EQ-5D数据。EQ-5D最常在与肌肉骨骼系统相关的登记处收集,但在其他疾病领域也有广泛应用。36个登记处向患者、临床医生或其他决策者提供EQ-5D结果。22个登记处报告称EQ-5D数据用于随访、决策或质量改进。登记处最常报告的数据用途是评估干预措施以及用于国家层面的护理质量跟踪质量指标。

结论

瑞典NQRs中EQ-5D数据的收集和使用各不相同,这可能部分归因于登记处的不同目的。所提供的使用示例说明了EQ-5D数据如何为医疗保健系统不同层面的决策提供信息。然而,EQ-5D数据的使用仍有改进空间。

相似文献

1
Collection and use of EQ-5D for follow-up, decision-making, and quality improvement in health care - the case of the Swedish National Quality Registries.在医疗保健领域将EQ-5D用于随访、决策制定及质量改进——以瑞典国家质量登记处为例
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Sep 16;4(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00231-8.
2
Variations in Patients' Overall Assessment of Their Health Across and Within Disease Groups Using the EQ-5D Questionnaire: Protocol for a Longitudinal Study in the Swedish National Quality Registers.使用EQ-5D问卷对疾病组间和组内患者健康总体评估的差异:瑞典国家质量登记处的一项纵向研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 27;10(8):e27669. doi: 10.2196/27669.
3
Longitudinal study of patients' health-related quality of life using EQ-5D-3L in 11 Swedish National Quality Registers.在11个瑞典国家质量登记处使用EQ-5D-3L对患者健康相关生活质量进行的纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e048176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048176.
4
One size fits none - a qualitative study investigating nine national quality registries' conditions for use in quality improvement, research and interaction with patients.一种尺码不适合所有人——一项定性研究,调查九个国家质量登记处用于质量改进、研究以及与患者互动的条件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3621-9.
5
Analysis of three outcome measures in moderate to severe psoriasis: a registry-based study of 2450 patients.三种中重度银屑病结局指标分析:基于注册研究的 2450 例患者。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Apr;166(4):797-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10778.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
6
Evaluation of the usefulness of EQ-5D as a patient-reported outcome measure using the Paretian classification of health change among patients with chronic heart failure.使用帕累托健康变化分类法评估EQ-5D作为慢性心力衰竭患者自我报告结局指标的有用性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jun 26;4(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00216-7.
7
Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?脊柱手术后3个月患者报告的结局:在真实世界注册平台中,它是12个月结局的准确预测指标吗?
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E17. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15356.
8
Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.在登记工作中准确衡量颈椎手术的质量和效果:确定最有效且灵敏的指标。
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.444. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
9
Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers.患者报告的瑞典国家质量登记处的结果。
J Intern Med. 2016 Feb;279(2):141-53. doi: 10.1111/joim.12409. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
10
Quality of Life and General Health After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Pathologies: Determining a Valid and Responsive Metric of Health State Utility.颈椎疾病择期手术后的生活质量和总体健康状况:确定健康状态效用的有效且敏感的指标
Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77(4):553-60; discussion 560. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000886.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring and Valuing Health Using EuroQol Instruments: New Developments 2025 and Beyond.使用欧洲生活质量量表工具测量和评估健康状况:2025年及以后的新进展
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00989-2.
2
Trends in surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A contemporary literature review.肋骨骨折手术固定的趋势:当代文献综述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 23;66:103028. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103028. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Use of a generic Paediatric Patient Reported Outcome Measure (P-PROM) in Routine hospital Outpatient Care for Kids (ROCK): A qualitative exploration of adolescent, caregiver and service provider perspectives (P-PROM ROCK Phase 1).

本文引用的文献

1
Value Lies in the Eye of the Patients: The Why, What, and How of Patient-reported Outcomes Measures.价值在于患者眼中:患者报告结局测量的原因、内容和方法。
Clin Ther. 2020 Jan;42(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.11.016. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
2
Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society.最大化患者报告结局评估对患者和社会的影响。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 24;364:k5267. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5267.
3
Exploring the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: need for more real-world evidence results in the peer reviewed literature.
在儿童常规医院门诊护理(ROCK)中使用通用儿科患者报告结局量表(P-PROM):对青少年、照顾者和服务提供者观点的定性探索(P-PROM ROCK 第一阶段)
Qual Life Res. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03990-3.
4
Validity and Responsiveness of EQ-5D in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.EQ-5D在哮喘中的有效性和反应性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient. 2025 Jan;18(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00711-9. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
5
Implementing routine collection of EQ-5D-5L in a breast cancer outpatient clinic.在乳腺癌门诊常规收集 EQ-5D-5L。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0307225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307225. eCollection 2024.
6
Acceptability of the use of health related quality of life measurements for decision-making in healthcare science in Vietnam: a qualitative study.越南医疗保健科学决策中使用健康相关生活质量测量的可接受性:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 22;14(8):e082405. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082405.
7
Construct validity of EQ-5D-5L among patients with inflammatory bowel disease-a study based on real-world data from the Swedish Inflammatory Bowel Disease Registry.炎症性肠病患者 EQ-5D-5L 的结构效度——基于瑞典炎症性肠病登记处真实世界数据的研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 27;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00709-9.
8
Patient acceptable symptom state and treatment failure threshold values for work productivity and activity Impairment and EQ-5D-5L in osteoarthritis.骨关节炎患者在工作生产力、活动能力受损及EQ-5D-5L方面的可接受症状状态和治疗失败阈值
Qual Life Res. 2024 May;33(5):1257-1266. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03602-6. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
9
Healthcare consumer acceptability of routine use of the EQ-5D-5L in clinical care: a cross-sectional survey.医疗保健消费者对在临床护理中常规使用EQ-5D-5L的可接受性:一项横断面调查。
Qual Life Res. 2024 May;33(5):1307-1321. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03598-z. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
10
Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system.采用多利益相关者共同设计流程来开发一个面向整个卫生服务组织的患者报告结局测量收集系统。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):619-636. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03552-5. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
探索患者报告结局指标在癌症护理中的实施情况:同行评审文献中对更多真实世界证据的需求及结果
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Dec 27;2(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0091-0.
4
Measurement of patient-reported outcomes. 2: Are current measures failing us?患者报告结局的测量。2:当前的测量方法是否让我们失望?
J Med Econ. 2019 Jun;22(6):523-530. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1560304. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide.在临床实践中实施患者报告结局测量:ISOQOL 用户指南的配套指南。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):621-627. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2048-4. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
6
One size fits none - a qualitative study investigating nine national quality registries' conditions for use in quality improvement, research and interaction with patients.一种尺码不适合所有人——一项定性研究,调查九个国家质量登记处用于质量改进、研究以及与患者互动的条件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3621-9.
7
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).系统评价随机对照试验评估患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的使用。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):567-592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2016-z. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
8
How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis.聚合患者报告结局测量数据如何促进医疗保健改善?一个现实主义的综合。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jan;23(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1355819617740925. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
Good outcome scores and high satisfaction rate after primary total ankle replacement.初次全踝关节置换术后良好的结果评分及高满意度
Acta Orthop. 2017 Dec;88(6):675-680. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1366405. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Sustained Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Dermatology Life Quality Index and EuroQol-5D response of biological treatment in psoriasis: 10 years of real-world data in the Swedish National Psoriasis Register.银屑病生物治疗的持续银屑病面积和严重程度指数、皮肤病生活质量指数和 EuroQol-5D 反应:瑞典国家银屑病登记处 10 年真实世界数据。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Jan;178(1):245-252. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15757. Epub 2018 Jan 9.