Giani Matt S, Attewell Paul, Walling David
Office of Strategy and Policy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA.
J Higher Educ. 2019 Aug 20;91(4):514-539. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2019.1653122.
Many undergraduates leave college without completing a degree or credential. Some researchers characterize this as a waste of the student's time because (they assert) college short of a degree does not yield any advantage in the labor market. Using data for an entire cohort of students graduating high school in Texas in one year, we compare the employment and earnings years later of those who do not go beyond high school with those who enter college but do not complete a credential. Using techniques that address selection bias, we find that students with "some college" are considerably more likely to be employed fifteen years after high school graduation and tend to earn significantly more than their counterparts who do not go to college. These benefits are found across student subgroups, with low-income students, women, and students of color generally experiencing the greatest improvements in labor outcomes from college attendance. While college dropouts do not fare as well as college graduates, incomplete college nevertheless functions for many as a stepping-stone into a better labor market position.
许多本科生未完成学位或取得证书就离开了大学。一些研究人员将此视为对学生时间的浪费,因为(他们声称)未取得学位的大学教育在劳动力市场上不会带来任何优势。利用得克萨斯州某一年全体高中毕业生的数据,我们比较了那些没有接受高中以上教育的学生与那些进入大学但未取得证书的学生多年后的就业情况和收入。运用解决选择偏差的技术,我们发现,“上过一些大学”的学生在高中毕业十五年后就业的可能性要大得多,而且他们的收入往往比那些没有上大学的同龄人高得多。这些好处在各个学生亚群体中都有体现,低收入学生、女性和有色人种学生通常从大学教育中在劳动成果方面获得的改善最大。虽然大学辍学者的情况不如大学毕业生,但对于许多人来说,未完成的大学教育仍是进入更好劳动力市场地位的垫脚石。