• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双重稳健估计因果效应。

Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):761-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq439. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwq439
PMID:21385832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3070495/
Abstract

Doubly robust estimation combines a form of outcome regression with a model for the exposure (i.e., the propensity score) to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. When used individually to estimate a causal effect, both outcome regression and propensity score methods are unbiased only if the statistical model is correctly specified. The doubly robust estimator combines these 2 approaches such that only 1 of the 2 models need be correctly specified to obtain an unbiased effect estimator. In this introduction to doubly robust estimators, the authors present a conceptual overview of doubly robust estimation, a simple worked example, results from a simulation study examining performance of estimated and bootstrapped standard errors, and a discussion of the potential advantages and limitations of this method. The supplementary material for this paper, which is posted on the Journal's Web site (http://aje.oupjournals.org/), includes a demonstration of the doubly robust property (Web Appendix 1) and a description of a SAS macro (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) for doubly robust estimation, available for download at http://www.unc.edu/~mfunk/dr/.

摘要

双重稳健估计结合了一种结果回归形式和一种暴露(即倾向评分)模型,以估计暴露对结果的因果效应。当单独用于估计因果效应时,只有在统计模型正确指定的情况下,结果回归和倾向评分方法才是无偏的。双重稳健估计器将这两种方法结合在一起,使得只有 2 种模型中的 1 种需要正确指定,才能获得无偏的效应估计器。在这篇关于双重稳健估计器的介绍性文章中,作者提出了双重稳健估计的概念概述、一个简单的实例、模拟研究结果,该研究检查了估计和自举标准误差的性能,以及对这种方法的潜在优点和局限性的讨论。本文的补充材料(发布在杂志的网站上:http://aje.oupjournals.org/)包括对双重稳健性的演示(Web 附录 1)和一个用于双重稳健估计的 SAS 宏(SAS 研究所,北卡罗来纳州卡里)的描述,可在 http://www.unc.edu/~mfunk/dr/ 下载。

相似文献

1
Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.双重稳健估计因果效应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):761-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq439. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
2
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.平均因果效应的分层双稳健估计量。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):270-7. doi: 10.1111/biom.12157. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
4
Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.机器学习结果回归改进了平均因果效应的双重稳健估计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1120-1133. doi: 10.1002/pds.5074. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
6
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis.目标最大似然估计在安全性分析中的应用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.017.
7
Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.倾向评分加权加上比例风险模型中的调整不是双重稳健的。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae069.
8
Inverse probability weighting and doubly robust standardization in the relative survival framework.逆概率加权和相对生存框架中的双重稳健标准化。
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 30;40(27):6069-6092. doi: 10.1002/sim.9171. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.使用广义线性结局模型进行双重稳健估计的治疗权重逆概率法。
Stat Med. 2024 Feb 10;43(3):534-547. doi: 10.1002/sim.9969. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
10
Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.在结局、暴露或混杂因素中存在缺失数据的情况下,因果暴露效应的双重稳健估计量。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4382-400. doi: 10.1002/sim.5643. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Macrovascular and microvascular outcomes of metabolic surgery versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with diabetes and obesity.糖尿病和肥胖患者中代谢手术与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的大血管和微血管结局
Nat Med. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03893-3.
2
Observational Study of the Safety of Chiropractic vs Medical Care Among Older Adults With Neck Pain.针对颈部疼痛的老年人,整脊疗法与医疗护理安全性的观察性研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.07.002.
3
Much Hypothesized, Rarely Tested: Public Preschool Attendance Predicts Executive Functioning Skills in 3 Grade.多为假设,鲜有验证:公立幼儿园入学情况可预测三年级时的执行功能技能。
Appl Dev Sci. 2024 May 6. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2024.2345365.
4
Adverse Childhood Experiences and Health at Age 50 Years in the National Child Development Study.英国全国儿童发展研究中的童年不良经历与50岁时的健康状况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25708.
5
Causal estimation of time-varying treatments in observational studies: a scoping review of methods, applications, and missing data practices.观察性研究中时变治疗的因果估计:方法、应用及缺失数据处理的范围综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02633-y.
6
A Review of Causal Inference Methods for Estimating the Effects of Exposure Change When Incident Exposure Is Unobservable.当无法观察到事件暴露时用于估计暴露变化影响的因果推断方法综述
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2024 Dec;11(4):185-198. doi: 10.1007/s40471-024-00343-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
7
Participation in community gathering place and social capital: A longitudinal study of older adults.参与社区聚集场所与社会资本:一项针对老年人的纵向研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jun 16;31:101828. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101828. eCollection 2025 Sep.
8
Cardiometabolic monitoring in children and adolescents prescribed antipsychotics in Australian primary care, 2011 to 2017.2011年至2017年澳大利亚初级保健机构中接受抗精神病药物治疗的儿童和青少年的心脏代谢监测
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 13;59(9):48674251361696. doi: 10.1177/00048674251361696.
9
Doubly Robust Estimation of Marginal Cumulative Incidence Curves for Competing Risk Analysis.用于竞争风险分析的边际累积发病率曲线的双重稳健估计
Stat Med. 2025 Aug;44(18-19):e70066. doi: 10.1002/sim.70066.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-4 Versus Real-World Physician's Choice of Therapy from the Flatiron Registry in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.cilta-cabtagene autoleucel在CARTITUDE-4研究中与来那度胺难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者实际接受的医生选择治疗方案相比的疗效对比:来自Flatiron注册研究的数据
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03308-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.基于靶向最大似然法的因果推断:第一部分。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 2. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1211.
2
Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution--a simulation study.存在未测量混杂时的处理效应:处理倾向评分分布尾部的观测值——一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct 1;172(7):843-54. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq198. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
3
Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression.倾向评分估计:神经网络、支持向量机、决策树(CART)和元分类器作为逻辑回归的替代方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):826-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.020.
4
Invited commentary: positivity in practice.特邀评论:实践中的积极性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 15;171(6):674-7; discussion 678-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp436. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
5
The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption?因果推断中的一致性声明:是定义还是假设?
Epidemiology. 2009 Jan;20(1):3-5. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818ef366.
6
Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.构建边际结构模型的逆概率权重。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):656-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn164. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
7
Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.评论:揭开双重稳健性的神秘面纱:从不完整数据估计总体均值的替代策略比较。
Stat Sci. 2007;22(4):569-573. doi: 10.1214/07-STS227.
8
Evaluating uses of data mining techniques in propensity score estimation: a simulation study.评估数据挖掘技术在倾向评分估计中的应用:一项模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jun;17(6):546-55. doi: 10.1002/pds.1555.
9
Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.从流行病学数据中估计因果效应。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jul;60(7):578-86. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029496.
10
Insights into different results from different causal contrasts in the presence of effect-measure modification.在存在效应测量修正的情况下,对不同因果对比产生的不同结果的洞察。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Oct;15(10):698-709. doi: 10.1002/pds.1231.