Naldini Gabriele, Caminati Filippo, Sturiale Alessandro, Fabiani Bernardina, Cafaro Danilo, Menconi Claudia, Mascagni Domenico, Celedon Porzio Felipe
Proctology and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre, University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Surg J (N Y). 2020 Sep 10;6(3):e145-e152. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712542. eCollection 2020 Jul.
The introduction and diffusion of new techniques for hemorrhoidal surgery have made it clear how much Goligher classification is inadequate in the modern times, lacking in any correlation between anatomical and clinical features to a surgical procedure. The aim of the study was to evaluate if the application of a new classification of hemorrhoidal diseases might lead to an improvement in the postoperative surgical outcomes. From January 2014 to December 2015, all patients undergoing surgery for hemorrhoidal disease were enrolled. The procedures performed were based upon a new anatomical/clinical-therapeutic classification (A/CTC) considering these items: anatomical presentation, symptom types and frequency, associated diseases, and available surgical treatments and their related contraindications. The new classification identified four groups: A (outpatient), B, C, and D (surgical approaches). The overall outcomes were assessed and then stratified by surgical groups. These data were then analyzed in comparison with the published data about all the surgical procedures performed. A total of 381 patients underwent surgery and they were stratified as follows: Group B (39), C (202), and D (140). Group B underwent Doppler-guided dearterialization with mucopexies or tissue selective therapy, Group C stapled procedures, and Group D hemorrhoidectomy. The mean follow-up was 30 months. The overall outcomes were: success rate 92.4%, recurrences 7.6%, postoperative complications 4.8%, long-term complications 5.4%, and reoperation rate 2.7%. The success rates stratified by groups were: B, 85%); C, 91.4%; and D, 95.7%. The A/CTC proved to be useful in stratifying the patients and choosing the proper treatment for each case. This classification seems to improve the outcome of different surgical procedures if compared with those already published.
痔手术新技术的引入和推广清楚地表明,在现代,戈利格尔分类法有多么不足,它缺乏解剖学与临床特征和手术方法之间的任何关联。本研究的目的是评估一种新的痔病分类法的应用是否可能改善术后手术效果。
2014年1月至2015年12月,纳入所有接受痔病手术的患者。所实施的手术基于一种新的解剖学/临床治疗分类法(A/CTC),该分类法考虑以下因素:解剖学表现、症状类型及频率、相关疾病以及可用的手术治疗方法及其相关禁忌证。新分类法确定了四组:A组(门诊治疗)、B组、C组和D组(手术治疗)。评估总体结果,然后按手术组进行分层。然后将这些数据与已发表的所有手术操作数据进行比较分析。
共有381例患者接受了手术,他们被分层如下:B组(39例)、C组(202例)和D组(140例)。B组接受多普勒引导下的去动脉化加黏膜固定术或组织选择性治疗,C组接受吻合器手术,D组接受痔切除术。平均随访时间为30个月。总体结果为:成功率92.4%,复发率7.6%,术后并发症4.8%,远期并发症5.4%,再次手术率2.7%。按组分层的成功率为:B组85%;C组91.4%;D组95.7%。
事实证明,A/CTC在对患者进行分层以及为每个病例选择合适的治疗方法方面是有用的。与已发表的结果相比,这种分类法似乎能改善不同手术操作的效果。