• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症患者的健康状态效用值:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Health State Utility Values in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1256-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.014
PMID:32940244
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patient preferences are increasingly important in informing clinical and policy decisions. Health-state utility values (HSUVs) are quantitative measures of people's preferences over different health states. In schizophrenia, there is no clarity about HSUVs across the symptoms' severity spectrum. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the literature on HSUVs in people with schizophrenia.

METHODS

We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, EconLit, The Cochrane Library, and specialized databases. The studies reporting HSUVs in people with schizophrenia were selected and pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the mean HSUV obtained from participants.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies involving 87 335 participants were included. The pooled estimate using direct elicitation was a mean HSUV of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88) for mild symptomatic states, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54-0.85) in moderate states, and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.13-0.56) in severe states. Studies using indirect techniques resulted in a pooled mean HSUV of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78) applying the EuroQol 5-dimension, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.62-0.71) in the Short-Form 6-dimension, and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57-0.61) using the Quality of Well-Being scale. All the estimates resulted in considerable heterogeneity, partially reduced by meta-regression.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the severity of psychotic symptoms has an important effect on HSUVs in schizophrenia, with values mirroring patients with disabling physical conditions such as cancer and stroke. Decision makers should be aware of these results when including people's preferences in trials, models, and policy decisions.

摘要

目的

患者偏好在为临床和政策决策提供信息方面越来越重要。健康状态效用值(HSUV)是衡量人们对不同健康状态偏好的定量指标。在精神分裂症中,对于整个症状严重程度范围内的 HSUV 尚不清楚。本荟萃分析旨在综合精神分裂症患者 HSUV 的文献。

方法

我们检索了 Medline、PsycInfo、Embase、EconLit、The Cochrane Library 和专业数据库。选择并汇总了报告精神分裂症患者 HSUV 的研究进行随机效应荟萃分析。主要结局指标为参与者的平均 HSUV。

结果

共纳入 54 项研究,涉及 87335 名参与者。使用直接 elicitation 的汇总估计值为轻度症状状态的平均 HSUV 为 0.79(95% CI:0.70-0.88),中度状态为 0.69(95% CI:0.54-0.85),重度状态为 0.34(95% CI:0.13-0.56)。使用间接技术的研究得出的平均 HSUV 汇总值为应用 EuroQol 5 维度的 0.73(95% CI:0.67-0.78),应用 Short-Form 6 维度的 0.66(95% CI:0.62-0.71),应用健康状况量表的 0.59(95% CI:0.57-0.61)。所有估计值均存在较大的异质性,部分通过元回归得到了缓解。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,精神症状的严重程度对精神分裂症患者的 HSUV 有重要影响,其价值反映了患有癌症和中风等致残性身体疾病的患者的情况。决策者在将人们的偏好纳入试验、模型和政策决策时应考虑到这些结果。

相似文献

1
Health State Utility Values in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.精神分裂症患者的健康状态效用值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1256-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Health State Utility Values for Osteoarthritis-Related Conditions.系统评价和荟萃分析与骨关节炎相关疾病的健康状态效用值。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Feb;74(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/acr.24478. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
Health state utility values among children and adolescents with disabilities: protocol for a systematic review.残疾儿童和青少年的健康状态效用值:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 21;8(2):e019978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019978.
4
Health state utility values in schizophrenia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.精神分裂症健康状态效用值的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):142-144. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300089. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.头颈部癌健康状态效用值的系统文献综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 2;15(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0748-z.
6
Systematic review of health state utility values in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with a focus on previously treated patients.系统评价转移性非小细胞肺癌的健康状态效用值,重点关注既往治疗患者。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 12;16(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0994-8.
7
Health state utility values of type 2 diabetes mellitus and related complications: a systematic review and meta-regression.2 型糖尿病及其相关并发症的健康状态效用值:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 7;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02288-1.
8
Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results.系统评价在欧洲慢性丙型肝炎药物经济学评价中使用的健康状态效用值:对成本效益结果的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):29-44. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00600-w.
9
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Community- and Choice-Based Health State Utility Values for Lung Cancer.基于社区和选择的肺癌健康状态效用值的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Nov;38(11):1187-1200. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00947-x.
10
Health State Utility Values of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2型糖尿病及其相关并发症的健康状态效用值:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2023 Mar;34:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A quantitative projection of the net health effects of cannabis legalization in Germany.德国大麻合法化对健康净影响的定量预测。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0330879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330879. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk of bias in routine mental health outcome data: the case of Health of the Nation Outcome Scales.常规心理健康结果数据中的偏倚风险:以国家健康结果量表为例。
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jun 5;28(1):e301669. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301669.
3
Utility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.胃癌健康状况的效用值:一项系统评价
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Mar;46:101063. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101063. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: economic evaluation from São Paulo, Brazil.中低收入国家精神病早期干预的成本效益:来自巴西圣保罗的经济评估。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Apr 5;33:e21. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000222.
5
Quality Appraisal in Systematic Literature Reviews of Studies Eliciting Health State Utility Values: Conceptual Considerations.系统评价研究中健康状态效用值研究的质量评价:概念性考虑。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jul;42(7):767-782. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01365-z. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
6
Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis.健康状态效用值的系统文献综述质量评价:描述性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01784-6.
7
Health State Utility Values in People With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脑卒中患者的健康状态效用值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e024296. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024296. Epub 2022 Jun 22.