Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):656-663. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1824050. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
The emergency department (ED) poses challenges to effective handoff from emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to ED staff. Despite the importance of a complete and accurate patient handoff report between EMS and trauma staff, communication is often interrupted, incomplete, or otherwise ineffective. The echanism of injury/edical Complaint, njuries or nspections head to toe, vital igns, and reatments (MIST) report initiative was implemented to standardize the handoff process. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether documentation of prehospital care in the inpatient medical record improved after MIST implementation.
Research staff abstracted data from the EMS and inpatient medical records of trauma patients transported by EMS and treated at a Level I trauma center from January 2015 through June 2017. Data included patient demographics, mechanism and location of injury, vital signs, treatments, and period of data collection (pre-MIST and post-MIST). We summarized the MIST elements in EMS and inpatient medical records and assessed the presence or absence of data elements in the inpatient record from the EMS record and the agreement between the two sets of records over time to determine if implementation of MIST improved documentation.
We analyzed data from 533 trauma patients transported by EMS and treated in a Level I trauma center (pre-MIST: n = 281; post-MIST: n = 252). For mechanism of injury, agreement between the two records was ≥96% before and after MIST implementation. Cardiac arrest and location of injury were under-reported in the inpatient record before MIST; post-MIST, there were no significant discrepancies, indicating an improvement in reporting. Reporting of prehospital hypotension improved from 76.5% pre-MIST to 83.3% post-MIST. After MIST implementation, agreement between the EMS and inpatient records increased for the reporting of fluid administration (45.6% to 62.7%) and decreased for reporting of pain medications (72.2% to 61.9%).
The use of the standardized MIST tool for EMS to hospital patient handoff was associated with a mixed value on inpatient documentation of prehospital events. After MIST implementation, agreement was higher for mechanism and location of injury and lower for vital signs and treatments. Further research can advance the prehospital to treatment facility handoff process.
急诊科(ED)给来自急救医疗服务(EMS)人员到 ED 工作人员的有效交接带来了挑战。尽管在 EMS 和创伤人员之间进行完整和准确的患者交接报告非常重要,但沟通经常被中断、不完整或其他方式无效。实施损伤/医疗投诉、损伤或检查从头到脚、生命体征和治疗(MIST)报告倡议是为了规范交接过程。本研究的目的是评估在实施 MIST 后,住院病历中是否记录了院前护理情况。
研究人员从 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月期间通过 EMS 转运并在一级创伤中心接受治疗的创伤患者的 EMS 和住院病历中提取数据。数据包括患者人口统计学、损伤机制和位置、生命体征、治疗以及数据收集时间段(MIST 实施前和 MIST 实施后)。我们总结了 EMS 和住院病历中的 MIST 要素,并评估了住院病历中是否存在 EMS 记录中的数据要素以及随着时间的推移两套记录之间的一致性,以确定 MIST 的实施是否改善了文档记录。
我们分析了 533 名通过 EMS 转运并在一级创伤中心接受治疗的创伤患者的数据(MIST 实施前:n=281;MIST 实施后:n=252)。对于损伤机制,在实施 MIST 前后,两套记录之间的一致性均≥96%。在 MIST 实施之前,在住院病历中报告心脏骤停和损伤位置的情况较少;MIST 实施后,没有明显差异,表明报告有所改善。院前低血压的报告从 MIST 实施前的 76.5%提高到 MIST 实施后的 83.3%。在实施 MIST 后,EMS 与住院病历在输液治疗(45.6%至 62.7%)报告方面的一致性增加,而在疼痛药物治疗(72.2%至 61.9%)报告方面的一致性降低。
使用标准化的 MIST 工具进行 EMS 到医院患者的交接与住院病历中对院前事件的记录有一定的关系。在实施 MIST 后,损伤机制和位置的一致性更高,而生命体征和治疗的一致性更低。进一步的研究可以推进从院前到治疗机构的交接过程。