Erika Ziller and Carly Milkowski are with the Maine Rural Health Research Center, University of Southern Maine, Portland.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1678-1686. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305868. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
The US public health community has demonstrated increasing awareness of rural health disparities in the past several years. Although current interest is high, the topic is not new, and some of the earliest public health literature includes reports on infectious disease and sanitation in rural places. Continuing through the first third of the 20th century, dozens of articles documented rural disparities in infant and maternal mortality, sanitation and water safety, health care access, and among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities. Current rural research reveals similar challenges, and strategies suggested for addressing rural-urban health disparities 100 years ago resonate today. This article examines rural public health literature from a century ago and its connections to contemporary rural health disparities. We describe parallels between current and historical rural public health challenges and discuss how strategies proposed in the early 20th century may inform current policy and practice. As we explore the new frontier of rural public health, it is critical to consider enduring rural challenges and how to ensure that proposed solutions translate into actual health improvements. (. 2020;110:1678-1686. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305868).
在过去的几年中,美国公共卫生界越来越意识到农村健康差距问题。尽管目前人们对此兴趣浓厚,但这个话题并非新鲜事物,一些最早的公共卫生文献中就有关于农村地区传染病和卫生的报告。从 20 世纪上半叶开始,数十篇文章记录了农村地区在婴儿和产妇死亡率、环境卫生和水安全、医疗保健获取以及黑人和其他有色人种社区方面的差异。当前的农村研究揭示了类似的挑战,并且 100 年前提出的解决城乡健康差距的策略在今天仍然适用。本文回顾了一个世纪前的农村公共卫生文献及其与当代农村健康差距的联系。我们描述了当前和历史上农村公共卫生挑战之间的相似之处,并讨论了如何将 20 世纪初提出的策略应用于当前的政策和实践。在探索农村公共卫生的新领域时,必须考虑到农村地区长期存在的挑战以及如何确保提出的解决方案能够转化为实际的健康改善。(2020 年;110:1678-1686。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305868)。