Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Blood Adv. 2020 Sep 22;4(18):4451-4462. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002546.
High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is an effective salvage treatment for eligible patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and early progression of disease (POD). Since the introduction of rituximab, HDT/ASCT is no longer recommended in first remission. We here explored whether consolidative HDT/ASCT improved survival in defined subgroups of previously untreated patients. We report survival analyses of 431 patients who received frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) for advanced FL, and were randomized to receive consolidative HDT/ASCT. We performed targeted genotyping of 157 diagnostic biopsies, and calculated genotype-based risk scores. HDT/ASCT improved failure-free survival (FFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.8, P = .07; as-treated: HR, 0.7, P = .04), but not overall survival (OS; HR, 1.3, P = .27; as-treated: HR, 1.4, P = .13). High-risk cohorts identified by FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), and the clinicogenetic risk models m7-FLIPI and POD within 24 months-prognostic index (POD24-PI) comprised 27%, 18%, and 22% of patients. HDT/ASCT did not significantly prolong FFS in high-risk patients as defined by FLIPI (HR, 0.9; P = .56), m7-FLIPI (HR, 0.9; P = .91), and POD24-PI (HR, 0.8; P = .60). Similarly, OS was not significantly improved. Finally, we used a machine-learning approach to predict benefit from HDT/ASCT by genotypes. Patients predicted to benefit from HDT/ASCT had longer FFS with HDT/ASCT (HR, 0.4; P = .03), but OS did not reach statistical significance. Thus, consolidative HDT/ASCT after frontline R-CHOP did not improve OS in unselected FL patients and subgroups selected by genotype-based risk models.
高剂量化疗和自体干细胞移植(HDT/ASCT)是滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)和疾病早期进展(POD)患者的有效挽救治疗方法。自从利妥昔单抗问世以来,HDT/ASCT 不再推荐用于首次缓解。我们在此探讨了巩固性 HDT/ASCT 是否能改善未经治疗的患者的特定亚组的生存。我们报告了 431 例接受一线利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗的晚期 FL 患者的生存分析,这些患者被随机分配接受巩固性 HDT/ASCT。我们对 157 例诊断性活检进行了靶向基因分型,并计算了基于基因型的风险评分。HDT/ASCT 改善了无失败生存(FFS;风险比 [HR],0.8,P =.07;治疗组:HR,0.7,P =.04),但未改善总生存(OS;HR,1.3,P =.27;治疗组:HR,1.4,P =.13)。FL 国际预后指数(FLIPI)、24 个月内临床遗传风险模型 m7-FLIPI 和预后指数(POD24-PI)确定的高危队列占患者的 27%、18%和 22%。HDT/ASCT 并未显著延长 FLIPI(HR,0.9;P =.56)、m7-FLIPI(HR,0.9;P =.91)和 POD24-PI(HR,0.8;P =.60)定义的高危患者的 FFS。同样,OS 也没有显著改善。最后,我们使用机器学习方法通过基因型预测 HDT/ASCT 的获益。预测从 HDT/ASCT 中获益的患者,接受 HDT/ASCT 后 FFS 更长(HR,0.4;P =.03),但 OS 未达到统计学意义。因此,未经选择的 FL 患者和基于基因型风险模型选择的亚组中,一线 R-CHOP 后巩固性 HDT/ASCT 并未改善 OS。