• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者抗VEGF治疗延长负荷剂量的成本-后果分析

Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients.

作者信息

Ruiz-Moreno J M, de Andrés-Nogales F, Oyagüez I

机构信息

Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.

Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Calle Manuel de Falla, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01637-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-020-01637-0
PMID:32943041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7500029/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The DRCR.net Protocol T clinical trial assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF treatments including aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME). Post -hoc analyses showed that after a 12-week induction period, there was still DME resolution in an increasing number of patients through week 24.

PURPOSE

To assess clinical and cost consequences of extending the anti-VEGF loading dose from 3 to 6 monthly injections in patients with persistent DME in Spain.

METHODS

From a hospital pharmacy perspective, a cost-consequence analysis model was developed to estimate the incremental cost needed to obtain an additional response at month 6. To estimate drug treatment costs, ex-factory prices (€, 2019) were considered for aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Response/nonresponse rates at 3/6 months were obtained from the Protocol T 24-week post hoc analysis (n = 546). Persistent DME was present in 50.8 and 31.6% of the 190 aflibercept-treated patients at month 3 and month 6, respectively. Of the 176 ranibizumab- and 180 bevacizumab-treated patients, 53.2 and 72.9%, respectively, had persistent DME at month 3, and 41.5 and 65.6%, respectively, had persistent DME at month 6. Sensitivity analysis considered the split of bevacizumab vials.

RESULTS

Extending the loading dose in nonresponder patients would cost €214,862.57, €208,488.98 and €134,483.16 to obtain 37, 21 and 13 additional aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab responder patients, respectively. The total number of extended injections (months 3-6) used in patients with persistent DME at month 6 was 180, 219 and 354 for aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To extend the anti-VEGF loading dose from 3 to 6 injections necessitates investing €5882.77 (8 injections), €10,091.03 (14 injections) and €10,198.59 (30 injections) per additional responder patient (3-month nonresponders and 6-month responders) to aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively. For the total of patients treated, on average €7927.02 (14 injections) per additional responder patient would be needed.

摘要

背景

DRCR.net 协议 T 临床试验评估了阿柏西普、雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗等抗 VEGF 治疗药物在糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)中的疗效和安全性对比。事后分析显示,在 12 周的诱导期后,直至第 24 周仍有越来越多的患者的 DME 得到缓解。

目的

评估在西班牙,将抗 VEGF 负荷剂量从每月 3 次注射延长至 6 次注射对持续性 DME 患者的临床和成本影响。

方法

从医院药房的角度出发,建立了一个成本效益分析模型,以估算在第 6 个月获得额外疗效所需的增量成本。为估算药物治疗成本,考虑了阿柏西普、雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗的出厂价格(欧元,2019 年)。3/6 个月时的缓解/未缓解率来自协议 T 的 24 周事后分析(n = 546)。在接受阿柏西普治疗的 190 例患者中,分别有 50.8%和 31.6%在第 3 个月和第 6 个月出现持续性 DME。在接受雷珠单抗治疗的 176 例患者和接受贝伐单抗治疗的 180 例患者中,第 3 个月分别有 53.2%和 72.9%出现持续性 DME,第 6 个月分别有 41.5%和 65.6%出现持续性 DME。敏感性分析考虑了贝伐单抗药瓶的拆分情况。

结果

在无反应患者中延长负荷剂量,分别需要花费 214,862.57 欧元、208,488.98 欧元和 134,483.16 欧元,才能使阿柏西普、雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗的反应患者分别增加 37 例、21 例和 13 例。在第 6 个月患有持续性 DME 的患者中,用于阿柏西普、雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗的延长注射总数(第 3 - 6 个月)分别为 180 次、219 次和 354 次。

结论

将抗 VEGF 负荷剂量从 3 次注射延长至 6 次注射,对于每增加一名反应患者(3 个月无反应且 6 个月有反应),分别需要对阿柏西普、雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗额外投入 5882.77 欧元(8 次注射)、10,091.03 欧元(14 次注射)和 10,198.59 欧元(30 次注射)。对于所有接受治疗的患者而言,平均每增加一名反应患者需要额外投入 7927.02 欧元(14 次注射)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed1c/7500029/d6a06af3d7f3/12886_2020_1637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed1c/7500029/d6a06af3d7f3/12886_2020_1637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed1c/7500029/d6a06af3d7f3/12886_2020_1637_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients.糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者抗VEGF治疗延长负荷剂量的成本-后果分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01637-0.
2
Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗伴有视力损害的累及中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿后持续性黄斑增厚:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565.
3
Comparison of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Extrapolation of Data to Clinical Practice.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较:数据外推至临床实践
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):95-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4110.
4
Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema: recent clinically relevant findings from DRCR.net Protocol T.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:DRCR.net方案T的近期临床相关研究结果
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;28(6):636-643. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000424.
5
Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项比较疗效随机临床试验的两年结果。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Analysis From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Comparative Effectiveness Trial.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本效益:来自糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络比较疗效试验的分析
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 1;134(8):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669.
7
Recent clinically relevant highlights from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络近期的临床相关要点。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 May;29(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000472.
8
Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Diabetic Macular Edema: Additional Efficacy Post Hoc Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial.糖尿病性黄斑水肿抗血管内皮生长因子比较有效性试验:一项随机临床试验的额外疗效事后分析
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12). doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3698.
9
Plasma Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Concentrations after Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema.玻璃体腔抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿后的血浆血管内皮生长因子浓度。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jul;125(7):1054-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Short-Term Outcomes of Aflibercept Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Patients With Incomplete Response to Ranibizumab and/or Bevacizumab.阿柏西普治疗对雷珠单抗和/或贝伐单抗反应不完全的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的短期疗效
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015 Oct;46(9):950-4. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20151008-08.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating anti-VEGF responses in diabetic macular edema: A systematic review with AI-powered treatment insights.评估糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的抗VEGF反应:一项具有人工智能辅助治疗见解的系统评价
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 1;73(6):797-806. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1810_24. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Efficacy & safety of brolucizumab 6.0 mg versus 3.6 mg in diabetic macular edema.6.0毫克与3.6毫克布罗卢izumab治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效与安全性比较
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Jan 13;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00628-x.
3
Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Cycles of Three Injections of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections.

本文引用的文献

1
Ranibizumab or Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.雷珠单抗或阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:抗视网膜病变!注册研究的 1 年结局比较。
Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):608-615. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
Usefulness of Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers from Aqueous Humor in Predicting Anti-VEGF Response in Diabetic Macular Edema: Results of a Pilot Study.房水液体活检生物标志物在预测糖尿病性黄斑水肿抗VEGF治疗反应中的应用价值:一项初步研究结果
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 2;8(11):1841. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111841.
3
Evaluation of ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in daily clinical practice.
抗血管内皮生长因子注射剂循环治疗 3 次治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 13;30(3):141-148. doi: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_17_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
4
Early-switch versus late-switch in patients with diabetic macular edema: a cost-effectiveness study.早期转换与晚期转换治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的成本效果研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;261(4):941-949. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05892-3. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Efficacy and mechanism of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for diabetic macular edema patients.抗血管内皮生长因子药物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的疗效及机制
World J Diabetes. 2022 Jul 15;13(7):532-542. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i7.532.
6
Pascal short-pulse plus subthreshold endpoint management laser therapy for diabetic macular edema: the "sandwich technique".帕斯卡短脉冲加阈下终点管理激光疗法治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:“三明治技术”
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2022 Jun 2;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40942-022-00381-5.
评价雷珠单抗和阿柏西普在日常临床实践中治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的效果。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0223793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223793. eCollection 2019.
4
Real-World Outcomes with Ranibizumab 0.5 mg in Patients with Visual Impairment due to Diabetic Macular Edema: 12-Month Results from the 36-Month BOREAL-DME Study.雷珠单抗0.5毫克治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿所致视力损害患者的真实世界转归:36个月BOREAL-DME研究的12个月结果
Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62(2):101-110. doi: 10.1159/000497406. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
Budget impact analysis of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema.地塞米松玻璃体内植入物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的预算影响分析。
Farm Hosp. 2018 Nov 1;42(6):244-250. doi: 10.7399/fh.11016.
6
Management of diabetic macular edema patients in clinical practice in Spain.西班牙临床实践中糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的管理
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;29(6):664-672. doi: 10.1177/1120672118804079. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
7
Editorial - Suboptimal response to intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for patients with diabetic macular edema: is there any point in switching treatment?社论——糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子治疗反应不佳:是否有必要转换治疗?
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Aug;22(15):5047-5050. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201808_15648.
8
Guidelines on Diabetic Eye Care: The International Council of Ophthalmology Recommendations for Screening, Follow-up, Referral, and Treatment Based on Resource Settings.糖尿病眼病护理指南:国际眼科理事会基于资源设置的筛查、随访、转诊和治疗建议。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1608-1622. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Shall we stay, or shall we switch? Continued anti-VEGF therapy versus early switch to dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema.我们是继续治疗,还是转换方案?在难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿中,继续抗 VEGF 治疗与早期转换为地塞米松植入物的比较。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Aug;55(8):789-796. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1151-x. Epub 2018 May 5.
10
Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗伴有视力损害的累及中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿后持续性黄斑增厚:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565.