Department of Health Services Research and Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2197-2204. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06708-6. Epub 2021 May 13.
Although early follow-up after discharge from an index admission (IA) has been postulated to reduce 30-day readmission, some researchers have questioned its efficacy, which may depend upon the likelihood of readmission at a given time and the health conditions contributing to readmissions.
To investigate the relationship between post-discharge services utilization of different types and at different timepoints and unplanned 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient costs.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study sample included 583,199 all-cause IAs among 2014 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries that met IA inclusion criteria.
The outcomes were probability of 30-day readmission, average readmission LOS per IA discharge, and average readmission inpatient cost per IA discharge. The primary independent variables were 7 post-discharge health services (institutional outpatient, primary care physician, specialist, non-physician provider, emergency department (ED), home health care, skilled nursing facility) utilized within 7 days, 14 days, and 30 days of IA discharge. To examine the association with post-discharge services utilization, we employed multivariable logistic regressions for 30-day readmissions and two-part models for LOS and inpatient costs.
Among all IA discharges, the probability of unplanned 30-day readmission was 0.1176, the average readmission LOS per discharge was 0.67 days, and the average inpatient cost per discharge was $5648. Institutional outpatient, home health care, and primary care physician visits at all timepoints were associated with decreased readmission and resource utilization. Conversely, 7-day and 14-day specialist visits were positively associated with all three outcomes, while 30-day visits were negatively associated. ED visits were strongly associated with increases in all three outcomes at all timepoints.
Post-discharge services of different types and at different timepoints have varying impacts on 30-day readmission, LOS, and costs. These impacts should be considered when coordinating post-discharge follow-up, and their drivers should be further explored to reduce readmission throughout the health care system.
尽管人们推测在索引入院(IA)后进行早期随访可以降低 30 天再入院率,但一些研究人员对其疗效提出了质疑,这可能取决于给定时间内再入院的可能性以及导致再入院的健康状况。
研究不同类型和不同时间点的出院后服务利用与计划外 30 天再入院、住院时间(LOS)和住院费用之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:研究样本包括符合 IA 纳入标准的 2014 年 Medicare 按服务收费受益人的 583199 例全因 IA。
结果是 30 天再入院的概率、每例 IA 出院的平均再入院 LOS 和每例 IA 出院的平均再入院住院费用。主要的独立变量是在 IA 出院后 7 天、14 天和 30 天内利用的 7 种出院后医疗服务(机构门诊、初级保健医生、专科医生、非医师提供者、急诊部 (ED)、家庭保健和熟练护理设施)。为了检查与出院后服务利用的关系,我们对 30 天再入院采用多变量逻辑回归,对 LOS 和住院费用采用两部分模型。
在所有 IA 出院中,计划外 30 天再入院的概率为 0.1176,每次出院的平均再入院 LOS 为 0.67 天,每次出院的平均住院费用为 5648 美元。所有时间点的机构门诊、家庭保健和初级保健医生就诊与降低再入院率和资源利用有关。相反,7 天和 14 天的专科医生就诊与所有三个结果呈正相关,而 30 天的就诊与所有三个结果呈负相关。ED 就诊在所有时间点与所有三个结果的增加都有很强的关联。
不同类型和不同时间点的出院后服务对 30 天再入院、住院时间和费用有不同的影响。在协调出院后随访时应考虑这些影响,并进一步探讨其驱动因素,以减少整个医疗保健系统的再入院率。