• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同社会经历对小鼠情绪状态的影响。

Effects of different social experiences on emotional state in mice.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Badestraße 13, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 17;10(1):15255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71994-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-71994-9
PMID:32943726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7498458/
Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of animals' emotions can be achieved by combining cognitive, behavioural, and physiological measures. Applying such a multi-method approach, we here examined the emotional state of mice after they had made one of three different social experiences: either a mildly "adverse", a "beneficial", or a "neutral" experience. Using a recently established touchscreen paradigm, cognitive judgement bias was assessed twice, once before and once after the respective experience. Anxiety-like behaviour was examined using a standardised battery of behavioural tests and faecal corticosterone metabolite concentrations were measured. Surprisingly, only minor effects of the social experiences on the animals' cognitive judgement bias and no effects on anxiety-like behaviour and corticosterone metabolite levels were found. It might be speculated that the experiences provided were not strong enough to exert the expected impact on the animals' emotional state. Alternatively, the intensive training procedure necessary for cognitive judgement bias testing might have had a cognitive enrichment effect, potentially countering external influences. While further investigations are required to ascertain the specific causes underlying our findings, the present study adds essential empirical data to the so far scarce amount of studies combining cognitive, behavioural, and physiological measures of emotional state in mice.

摘要

通过结合认知、行为和生理测量,可以全面了解动物的情绪。应用这种多方法的方法,我们在这里研究了小鼠在经历三种不同的社交体验后的情绪状态:轻度“不利”、“有益”或“中性”体验。使用最近建立的触摸屏范式,我们两次评估认知判断偏差,一次是在体验之前,一次是在体验之后。使用标准化的行为测试套件检查焦虑样行为,并测量粪便皮质酮代谢物浓度。令人惊讶的是,社交体验对动物的认知判断偏差几乎没有影响,对焦虑样行为和皮质酮代谢物水平也没有影响。可以推测,提供的体验不够强烈,无法对动物的情绪状态产生预期的影响。或者,认知判断偏差测试所需的密集训练程序可能具有认知丰富效应,潜在地抵消了外部影响。虽然需要进一步的研究来确定我们发现的具体原因,但本研究为目前结合认知、行为和生理测量来研究小鼠情绪状态的为数不多的研究提供了重要的经验数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/140bdf003f87/41598_2020_71994_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/37091dd25e6e/41598_2020_71994_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/42fffdb5b7e8/41598_2020_71994_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/4dd5480b6450/41598_2020_71994_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/c4cf1bbdb763/41598_2020_71994_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/140bdf003f87/41598_2020_71994_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/37091dd25e6e/41598_2020_71994_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/42fffdb5b7e8/41598_2020_71994_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/4dd5480b6450/41598_2020_71994_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/c4cf1bbdb763/41598_2020_71994_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1596/7498458/140bdf003f87/41598_2020_71994_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of different social experiences on emotional state in mice.不同社会经历对小鼠情绪状态的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 17;10(1):15255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71994-9.
2
Technology or ecology? New tools to assess cognitive judgement bias in mice.技术还是生态学?评估小鼠认知判断偏差的新工具。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Apr 19;362:279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
Regular touchscreen training affects faecal corticosterone metabolites and anxiety-like behaviour in mice.定期触屏训练会影响小鼠的粪便皮质酮代谢物和焦虑样行为。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Mar 5;401:113080. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113080. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
4
A test to identify judgement bias in mice.用于识别小鼠判断偏差的测试。
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Jul 15;233(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.039. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
5
Early-life social experiences in mice affect emotional behaviour and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function.早期的社会经历会影响老鼠的情绪行为和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Sep;102(3):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
6
Structural environmental enrichment and the way it is offered influence cognitive judgement bias and anxiety-like behaviours in zebrafish.结构性环境富集及其提供方式会影响斑马鱼的认知判断偏差和类似焦虑的行为。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):563-577. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01700-x. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
7
Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach.测量动物的情绪过程:认知方法的效用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 May;29(3):469-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002.
8
Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective.动物行为科学中的认知偏差:哲学视角。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):975-990. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01647-z. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
9
Social experiences during adolescence affect anxiety-like behavior but not aggressiveness in male mice.青春期的社交经历会影响雄性小鼠的焦虑样行为,但不会影响其攻击性。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 May 30;326:147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
10
Pharmacologically-induced stress has minimal impact on judgement and attention biases in sheep.药物诱发的应激对绵羊的判断和注意力偏差影响很小。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 7;9(1):11446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47691-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological agents and injection stress, but not social isolation, alter cognitive judgement bias in the mouse touchscreen operant chamber.药理制剂和注射应激,而非社会隔离,会改变小鼠触屏操作箱中的认知判断偏差。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 21;15(1):13689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98303-6.
2
Early postnatal NMDA receptor ablation in cortical interneurons impairs affective state discrimination and social functioning.皮质中间神经元在出生后早期进行NMDA受体消融会损害情感状态辨别和社交功能。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Jun;50(7):1119-1129. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02051-0. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
3
Lockbox enrichment facilitates manipulative and cognitive activities for mice.

本文引用的文献

1
Differential Effects of Serotonin Transporter Genotype on Anxiety-Like Behavior and Cognitive Judgment Bias in Mice.血清素转运体基因分型对小鼠焦虑样行为和认知判断偏差的不同影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Dec 3;13:263. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00263. eCollection 2019.
2
Pain-Induced Pessimism and Anhedonia: Evidence From a Novel Probability-Based Judgment Bias Test.疼痛诱发的悲观情绪和快感缺失:来自一项基于概率的新型判断偏差测试的证据。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Mar 20;13:54. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00054. eCollection 2019.
3
Technology or ecology? New tools to assess cognitive judgement bias in mice.
锁箱富集有助于小鼠进行操纵性和认知性活动。
Open Res Eur. 2024 Aug 28;4:108. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.17624.2. eCollection 2024.
4
Beyond the three-chamber test: toward a multimodal and objective assessment of social behavior in rodents.超越三室测试:走向啮齿动物社会行为的多模态和客观评估。
Mol Autism. 2022 Oct 25;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00521-6.
5
Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.一次乐观,就永远乐观吗?对小鼠认知判断偏差的研究。
Behav Ecol. 2022 Jun 3;33(4):775-788. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arac040. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
6
Using touchscreen-delivered cognitive assessments to address the principles of the 3Rs in behavioral sciences.利用触屏式认知评估来满足行为科学中 3R 原则。
Lab Anim (NY). 2021 Jul;50(7):174-184. doi: 10.1038/s41684-021-00791-2. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
技术还是生态学?评估小鼠认知判断偏差的新工具。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Apr 19;362:279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Effects of Cage Enrichment on Behavior, Welfare and Outcome Variability in Female Mice.笼内丰富环境对雌性小鼠行为、福利及结果变异性的影响
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 26;12:232. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00232. eCollection 2018.
5
A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task.一种跨物种判断偏差任务:将主动试验启动整合到空间 Go/No-go 任务中。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3.
6
Making Decisions under Ambiguity: Judgment Bias Tasks for Assessing Emotional State in Animals.在模糊性下做决策:用于评估动物情绪状态的判断偏差任务
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun 9;10:119. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00119. eCollection 2016.
7
Daily exposure to a touchscreen-paradigm and associated food restriction evokes an increase in adrenocortical and neural activity in mice.每天接触触摸屏模式及相关的食物限制会引起小鼠肾上腺皮质和神经活动增加。
Horm Behav. 2016 May;81:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
8
Happy hamsters? Enrichment induces positive judgement bias for mildly (but not truly) ambiguous cues to reward and punishment in Mesocricetus auratus.快乐的仓鼠?丰富的环境会使金黄仓鼠对轻微(但不是真正)的奖惩线索产生积极的判断偏差。
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Jul 29;2(7):140399. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140399. eCollection 2015 Jul.
9
Hope for the best or prepare for the worst? Towards a spatial cognitive bias test for mice.抱最好的希望还是做最坏的打算?迈向小鼠空间认知偏差测试。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e105431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105431. eCollection 2014.
10
Chronic psychosocial stress makes rats more 'pessimistic' in the ambiguous-cue interpretation paradigm.慢性心理社会应激使大鼠在模糊线索解释范式中更“悲观”。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;256:305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.036. Epub 2013 Aug 28.