• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快乐的仓鼠?丰富的环境会使金黄仓鼠对轻微(但不是真正)的奖惩线索产生积极的判断偏差。

Happy hamsters? Enrichment induces positive judgement bias for mildly (but not truly) ambiguous cues to reward and punishment in Mesocricetus auratus.

机构信息

School of Natural Sciences and Psychology , Liverpool John Moores University , Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Jul 29;2(7):140399. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140399. eCollection 2015 Jul.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.140399
PMID:26587255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4632568/
Abstract

Recent developments in the study of animal cognition and emotion have resulted in the 'judgement bias' model of animal welfare. Judgement biases describe the way in which changes in affective state are characterized by changes in information processing. In humans, anxiety and depression are characterized by increased expectation of negative events and negative interpretation of ambiguous information. Positive wellbeing is associated with enhanced expectation of positive outcomes and more positive interpretation of ambiguous information. Mood-congruent judgement biases for ambiguous information have been demonstrated in a range of animal species, with large variation in the way tests are administered and in the robustness of analyses. We highlight and address some issues using a laboratory species not previously tested: the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Hamsters were tested using a spatial judgement go/no-go task in enriched and unenriched housing. We included a number of controls and additional behavioural tests and applied a robust analytical approach using linear mixed effects models. Hamsters approached the ambiguous cues significantly more often when enriched than unenriched. There was no effect of enrichment on responses to the middle cue. We discuss these findings in light of mechanisms underlying processing cues to reward, punishment and true ambiguity, and the implications for the welfare of laboratory hamsters.

摘要

近年来,动物认知和情感研究的进展催生了动物福利的“判断偏差”模型。判断偏差描述了情感状态变化的特征,即信息处理的变化。在人类中,焦虑和抑郁的特征是对负面事件的预期增加和对模棱两可信息的负面解释。积极的幸福感与对积极结果的预期增强和对模棱两可信息的更积极解释有关。在一系列动物物种中,已经证明了对模棱两可信息的情绪一致的判断偏差,并且在测试的实施方式和分析的稳健性方面存在很大差异。我们使用以前未经过测试的实验室物种——叙利亚仓鼠(Mesocricetus auratus)来强调和解决一些问题。仓鼠在丰富和非丰富的环境中使用空间判断 Go/No-Go 任务进行测试。我们包括了一些对照和额外的行为测试,并使用线性混合效应模型进行了稳健的分析方法。与非丰富环境相比,仓鼠在丰富环境中接近模棱两可线索的频率明显更高。丰富环境对中间线索的反应没有影响。我们根据处理奖励、惩罚和真正模棱两可线索的机制以及对实验室仓鼠福利的影响来讨论这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/840e86c86d0c/rsos140399-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/e865ae987e22/rsos140399-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/f718aa44aff4/rsos140399-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/759e74a54e9e/rsos140399-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/840e86c86d0c/rsos140399-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/e865ae987e22/rsos140399-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/f718aa44aff4/rsos140399-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/759e74a54e9e/rsos140399-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/4632568/840e86c86d0c/rsos140399-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Happy hamsters? Enrichment induces positive judgement bias for mildly (but not truly) ambiguous cues to reward and punishment in Mesocricetus auratus.快乐的仓鼠?丰富的环境会使金黄仓鼠对轻微(但不是真正)的奖惩线索产生积极的判断偏差。
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Jul 29;2(7):140399. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140399. eCollection 2015 Jul.
2
Judgement bias of group housed gestating sows predicted by behavioral traits, but not physical measures of welfare.群体饲养妊娠母猪的判断偏差可通过行为特征预测,但不能通过福利的物理测量来预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264258. eCollection 2022.
3
Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.在奖励-奖励辨别认知偏差任务中,居住条件会影响大鼠对两种模糊性的反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Nov 1;274:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.048. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
4
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动物的乐观、悲观与判断偏差:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
5
A Screen-Peck Task for Investigating Cognitive Bias in Laying Hens.一项用于研究蛋鸡认知偏差的啄屏任务。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0158222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158222. eCollection 2016.
6
Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task.在一项平衡的“去/不去”判断偏差任务中,巴甫洛夫对学习的影响在大鼠和小鼠之间存在差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jul 28;331:214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
Measuring Cognitive Judgement Bias in Rats Using the Ambiguous-Cue Interpretation Test.使用模糊线索解释测试测量大鼠的认知判断偏差。
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2017 Jan 3;78:9.57.1-9.57.22. doi: 10.1002/cpns.19.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Environmental complexity positively impacts affective states of broiler chickens.环境复杂性对肉鸡的情感状态有积极影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 20;11(1):16966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95280-4.
10
A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task.一种跨物种判断偏差任务:将主动试验启动整合到空间 Go/No-go 任务中。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Affective bodily responses in monkeys predict subsequent pessimism, but not vice versa.猴子的情感身体反应可预测其随后的悲观情绪,但反之则不然。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Feb;292(2040):20242549. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2549. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Effect of pre-session discrimination training on performance in a judgement bias test in dogs.会前歧视训练对犬判断偏差测试表现的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Oct 12;27(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01905-2.
3
Effects of temporary access to environmental enrichment on measures of laboratory mouse welfare.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive bias, hand preference and welfare of common marmosets.普通狨猴的认知偏差、用手偏好与福利
Behav Brain Res. 2015;287:100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
2
Effects of optimism on motivation in rats.乐观对大鼠动机的影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;9:32. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00032. eCollection 2015.
3
Oxytocin induces positive expectations about ambivalent stimuli (cognitive bias) in dogs.催产素会引发犬类对矛盾刺激产生积极预期(认知偏差)。
临时获得环境丰容对实验小鼠福利测量指标的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65480-9.
4
Fearful snake pictures make monkeys pessimistic.可怕的蛇的图片让猴子变得悲观。
iScience. 2023 Aug 12;26(9):107622. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107622. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
5
Transcriptional profiles in the mouse amygdala after a cognitive judgment bias test largely depend on the genotype.认知判断偏差测试后小鼠杏仁核中的转录谱很大程度上取决于基因型。
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Oct 24;15:1025389. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1025389. eCollection 2022.
6
Structural environmental enrichment and the way it is offered influence cognitive judgement bias and anxiety-like behaviours in zebrafish.结构性环境富集及其提供方式会影响斑马鱼的认知判断偏差和类似焦虑的行为。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):563-577. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01700-x. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
7
A Behavioural Assay to Investigate Judgment Bias in Zebrafish.一种用于研究斑马鱼判断偏差的行为测定法。
Bio Protoc. 2022 Feb 20;12(4):e4327. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4327.
8
Social Buffering as a Tool for Improving Rodent Welfare.社会缓冲作为改善啮齿动物福利的工具。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Jan 1;61(1):5-14. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000006. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Short telomeres drive pessimistic judgement bias in zebrafish.端粒较短会导致斑马鱼产生悲观的判断偏差。
Biol Lett. 2021 Mar;17(3):20200745. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0745. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
10
Effects of different social experiences on emotional state in mice.不同社会经历对小鼠情绪状态的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 17;10(1):15255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71994-9.
Horm Behav. 2015 Mar;69:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
4
Frontal brain deactivation during a non-verbal cognitive judgement bias test in sheep.绵羊非言语认知判断偏差测试期间额叶脑区失活
Brain Cogn. 2015 Feb;93:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
5
Canine sense and sensibility: tipping points and response latency variability as an optimism index in a canine judgement bias assessment.犬类的感知与情感:在犬类判断偏差评估中作为乐观指数的临界点和反应潜伏期变异性
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 17;9(9):e107794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107794. eCollection 2014.
6
Hope for the best or prepare for the worst? Towards a spatial cognitive bias test for mice.抱最好的希望还是做最坏的打算?迈向小鼠空间认知偏差测试。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e105431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105431. eCollection 2014.
7
Effect of multilevel laboratory rat caging system on the well-being of the singly-housed Sprague Dawley rat.多级实验大鼠饲养系统对单笼饲养的斯普拉格-道利大鼠健康状况的影响。
Lab Anim. 2015 Jan;49(1):10-9. doi: 10.1177/0023677214547404. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
8
Cognitive judgment bias in the psychostimulant-induced model of mania in rats.大鼠精神兴奋剂诱导的躁狂模型中的认知判断偏差
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Feb;232(3):651-60. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3707-y. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
9
Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.在奖励-奖励辨别认知偏差任务中,居住条件会影响大鼠对两种模糊性的反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Nov 1;274:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.048. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
10
The effects of cocaine and mazindol on the cognitive judgement bias of rats in the ambiguous-cue interpretation paradigm.可卡因和马吲哚对大鼠在模糊线索解释范式中认知判断偏差的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Aug 15;270:206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.026. Epub 2014 May 23.