Suppr超能文献

一次乐观,就永远乐观吗?对小鼠认知判断偏差的研究。

Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.

作者信息

Bračić Marko, Bohn Lena, Siewert Viktoria, von Kortzfleisch Vanessa T, Schielzeth Holger, Kaiser Sylvia, Sachser Norbert, Richter S Helene

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Ecol. 2022 Jun 3;33(4):775-788. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arac040. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Individuals differ in the way they judge ambiguous information: some individuals interpret ambiguous information in a more optimistic, and others in a more pessimistic way. Over the past two decades, such "optimistic" and "pessimistic" cognitive judgment biases (CJBs) have been utilized in animal welfare science as indicators of animals' emotional states. However, empirical studies on their ecological and evolutionary relevance are still lacking. We, therefore, aimed at transferring the concept of "optimism" and "pessimism" to behavioral ecology and investigated the role of genetic and environmental factors in modulating CJB in mice. In addition, we assessed the temporal stability of individual differences in CJB. We show that the chosen genotypes (C57BL/6J and B6D2F1N) and environments ("scarce" and "complex") did not have a statistically significant influence on the responses in the CJB test. By contrast, they influenced anxiety-like behavior with C57BL/6J mice and mice from the "complex" environment displaying less anxiety-like behavior than B6D2F1N mice and mice from the "scarce" environment. As the selected genotypes and environments did not explain the existing differences in CJB, future studies might investigate the impact of other genotypes and environmental conditions on CJB, and additionally, elucidate the role of other potential causes like endocrine profiles and epigenetic modifications. Furthermore, we show that individual differences in CJB were repeatable over a period of seven weeks, suggesting that CJB represents a temporally stable trait in laboratory mice. Therefore, we encourage the further study of CJB within an animal personality framework.

摘要

个体在判断模糊信息的方式上存在差异

一些个体以更乐观的方式解读模糊信息,而另一些则以更悲观的方式解读。在过去二十年中,这种“乐观”和“悲观”的认知判断偏差(CJBs)已在动物福利科学中被用作动物情绪状态的指标。然而,关于它们的生态和进化相关性的实证研究仍然缺乏。因此,我们旨在将“乐观”和“悲观”的概念应用于行为生态学,并研究遗传和环境因素在调节小鼠CJB中的作用。此外,我们评估了CJB个体差异的时间稳定性。我们发现,所选的基因型(C57BL/6J和B6D2F1N)和环境(“匮乏”和“复杂”)对CJB测试中的反应没有统计学上的显著影响。相比之下,它们影响了焦虑样行为,C57BL/6J小鼠和来自“复杂”环境的小鼠比B6D2F1N小鼠和来自“匮乏”环境的小鼠表现出更少的焦虑样行为。由于所选的基因型和环境无法解释CJB中存在的差异,未来的研究可能会调查其他基因型和环境条件对CJB的影响,此外,阐明其他潜在原因如内分泌特征和表观遗传修饰的作用。此外,我们表明CJB的个体差异在七周的时间内是可重复的,这表明CJB在实验室小鼠中代表一种时间上稳定的特征。因此,我们鼓励在动物个性框架内进一步研究CJB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7425/9262167/b9148e7d821a/arac040_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.
Behav Ecol. 2022 Jun 3;33(4):775-788. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arac040. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
2
Transcriptional profiles in the mouse amygdala after a cognitive judgment bias test largely depend on the genotype.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Oct 24;15:1025389. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1025389. eCollection 2022.
3
Are lateralized and bold fish optimistic or pessimistic?
Anim Cogn. 2024 Jun 4;27(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01876-4.
4
Differential Effects of Serotonin Transporter Genotype on Anxiety-Like Behavior and Cognitive Judgment Bias in Mice.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Dec 3;13:263. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00263. eCollection 2019.
7
Trait "pessimism" is associated with increased sensitivity to negative feedback in rats.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun;16(3):516-26. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0410-y.
8
Effects of optimism on gambling in the rat slot machine task.
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Mar 1;300:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
More exploratory house mice judge an ambiguous situation more negatively.
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01414-y. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

4
Optimism and pessimism: a concept for behavioural ecology.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Jun;100(3):1152-1162. doi: 10.1111/brv.13178. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
5
Are lateralized and bold fish optimistic or pessimistic?
Anim Cogn. 2024 Jun 4;27(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01876-4.
6
Development of an IntelliCage-based cognitive bias test for mice.
Open Res Eur. 2023 Aug 8;2:128. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15294.2. eCollection 2022.
7
The power of a touch: Regular touchscreen training but not its termination affects hormones and behavior in mice.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Mar 16;17:1112780. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1112780. eCollection 2023.
8
Transcriptional profiles in the mouse amygdala after a cognitive judgment bias test largely depend on the genotype.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Oct 24;15:1025389. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1025389. eCollection 2022.
9
Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective.
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):975-990. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01647-z. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Negative expectations and vulnerability to stressors in animals.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:240-251. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
2
Regular touchscreen training affects faecal corticosterone metabolites and anxiety-like behaviour in mice.
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Mar 5;401:113080. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113080. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
3
Emotion in animal contests.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 25;287(1939):20201715. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1715. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
5
Effects of different social experiences on emotional state in mice.
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 17;10(1):15255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71994-9.
6
More exploratory house mice judge an ambiguous situation more negatively.
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01414-y. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 14;6:479. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00479. eCollection 2019.
9
Animal affect and decision-making.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:144-163. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
10
Pair housing makes calves more optimistic.
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56798-w.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验