Bračić Marko, Bohn Lena, Siewert Viktoria, von Kortzfleisch Vanessa T, Schielzeth Holger, Kaiser Sylvia, Sachser Norbert, Richter S Helene
Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Behav Ecol. 2022 Jun 3;33(4):775-788. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arac040. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
Individuals differ in the way they judge ambiguous information: some individuals interpret ambiguous information in a more optimistic, and others in a more pessimistic way. Over the past two decades, such "optimistic" and "pessimistic" cognitive judgment biases (CJBs) have been utilized in animal welfare science as indicators of animals' emotional states. However, empirical studies on their ecological and evolutionary relevance are still lacking. We, therefore, aimed at transferring the concept of "optimism" and "pessimism" to behavioral ecology and investigated the role of genetic and environmental factors in modulating CJB in mice. In addition, we assessed the temporal stability of individual differences in CJB. We show that the chosen genotypes (C57BL/6J and B6D2F1N) and environments ("scarce" and "complex") did not have a statistically significant influence on the responses in the CJB test. By contrast, they influenced anxiety-like behavior with C57BL/6J mice and mice from the "complex" environment displaying less anxiety-like behavior than B6D2F1N mice and mice from the "scarce" environment. As the selected genotypes and environments did not explain the existing differences in CJB, future studies might investigate the impact of other genotypes and environmental conditions on CJB, and additionally, elucidate the role of other potential causes like endocrine profiles and epigenetic modifications. Furthermore, we show that individual differences in CJB were repeatable over a period of seven weeks, suggesting that CJB represents a temporally stable trait in laboratory mice. Therefore, we encourage the further study of CJB within an animal personality framework.
一些个体以更乐观的方式解读模糊信息,而另一些则以更悲观的方式解读。在过去二十年中,这种“乐观”和“悲观”的认知判断偏差(CJBs)已在动物福利科学中被用作动物情绪状态的指标。然而,关于它们的生态和进化相关性的实证研究仍然缺乏。因此,我们旨在将“乐观”和“悲观”的概念应用于行为生态学,并研究遗传和环境因素在调节小鼠CJB中的作用。此外,我们评估了CJB个体差异的时间稳定性。我们发现,所选的基因型(C57BL/6J和B6D2F1N)和环境(“匮乏”和“复杂”)对CJB测试中的反应没有统计学上的显著影响。相比之下,它们影响了焦虑样行为,C57BL/6J小鼠和来自“复杂”环境的小鼠比B6D2F1N小鼠和来自“匮乏”环境的小鼠表现出更少的焦虑样行为。由于所选的基因型和环境无法解释CJB中存在的差异,未来的研究可能会调查其他基因型和环境条件对CJB的影响,此外,阐明其他潜在原因如内分泌特征和表观遗传修饰的作用。此外,我们表明CJB的个体差异在七周的时间内是可重复的,这表明CJB在实验室小鼠中代表一种时间上稳定的特征。因此,我们鼓励在动物个性框架内进一步研究CJB。