Elnewishy Ahmed
Orthopaedic Surgery, Kasr Al-Ainy Medical School, Kafr El Sheikh, EGY.
Cureus. 2020 Sep 11;12(9):e10379. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10379.
Background and objectives Recent experimental and clinical evidence supporting early debridement for open fractures has been questioned. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize and evaluate the current evidence regarding the timing of surgical debridement of open tibial fractures. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies compared the infection rate following early versus late debridement of open tibial fractures. We performed an online, bibliographic, search through the period from January 2000 to June 2020 in five bibliographic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO host. Results Nine retrospective studies and six prospective studies were included in the present meta-analysis study. The pooled effect estimate showed no statistically significant difference between early and late debridement regarding the overall infection rate (RD 0.02, 95% CI [0 - 0.04], p = 0.94); there was no significant heterogeneity in the pooled estimate (I2 = 5%). The subgroup analysis showed that the non-significant difference was consistent regardless of the definition of early and late timing to debridement. Likewise, the pooled effect estimate showed no statistically significant difference between early and late debridement regarding the deep infection rate (RD 0.01, 95% CI [-0.01 - 0.03], p = 0.92); there was no significant heterogeneity in the pooled estimate (I2 = 0%). The pooled effect estimate showed no statistically significant difference between early and late debridement regarding the nonunion rate as well. The funnel lots showed little evidence of asymmetry by visual inspection. Conclusion In conclusion, the current evidence demonstrates no impact of timing to surgical debridement on the infection rate following open tibial fractures in the adult population. Our results demonstrated that the risks of infection, deep infection, and nonunion were similar between patients who underwent delayed versus early debridement.
背景与目的 近期支持开放性骨折早期清创的实验和临床证据受到质疑。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在总结和评估有关开放性胫骨骨折手术清创时机的现有证据。方法 对比较开放性胫骨骨折早期与晚期清创后感染率的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们于2000年1月至2020年6月期间在五个文献数据库中进行了在线文献检索:考克兰对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、通过PubMed检索的Medline、科学网、Scopus和EBSCO主机。结果 本荟萃分析纳入了9项回顾性研究和6项前瞻性研究。合并效应估计显示,早期与晚期清创在总体感染率方面无统计学显著差异(风险差0.02,95%置信区间[0 - 0.04],p = 0.94);合并估计中无显著异质性(I² = 5%)。亚组分析表明,无论早期和晚期清创时机的定义如何,差异均不显著。同样,合并效应估计显示,早期与晚期清创在深部感染率方面无统计学显著差异(风险差0.01,95%置信区间[-0.01 - 0.03],p = 0.92);合并估计中无显著异质性(I² = 0%)。合并效应估计还显示,早期与晚期清创在骨不连率方面无统计学显著差异。漏斗图经目视检查几乎没有不对称的证据。结论 总之,现有证据表明手术清创时机对成人开放性胫骨骨折后的感染率没有影响。我们的结果表明,延迟清创与早期清创患者的感染、深部感染和骨不连风险相似。