Ibrahim Talal, Riaz Muhammad, Hegazy Abdelsalam, Erwin Patricia J, Tleyjeh Imad M
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar,
J Child Orthop. 2014 Mar;8(2):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s11832-014-0567-2. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
Open fractures are considered orthopedic emergencies that are traditionally treated with surgical debridement within 6 h of injury to prevent infection. However, this proclaimed "6-h rule" is arbitrary and not based on rigorous scientific evidence. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature that compares late (>6 h from the time of injury) to early (<6 h from the time of injury) surgical debridement of pediatric open fractures.
We searched several databases from 1946 to 2013 for any observational or experimental studies that evaluated late and early surgical debridement of pediatric open fractures. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to pool odds ratios for a comparison of infection rates between children undergoing late versus early surgical debridement. We also investigated the infection rates in upper- and lower-limb pediatric open fractures. Descriptive, quantitative, and qualitative data were extracted.
Of the 12 articles identified, three studies (retrospective cohort studies) were eligible for the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 714 open fractures. The pooled odds ratio (OR = 0.79) for infection between late and early surgical debridement was in favor of late surgical debridement but was not statistically significant (95 % CI 0.32, 1.99; p = 0.38, I (2) = 0 %). No significant difference in infection rate was detected between pediatric open fractures in the upper and lower limbs according to the time threshold in the included studies (OR = 0.72, 95 % CI 0.29, 1.82; p = 0.40, I (2) = 0 %).
The cumulative evidence does not, at present, indicate an association between late surgical debridement and higher infection rates in pediatric open fractures. However, initial expedient surgical debridement of open fractures in children should always remain the rule. Thus, multi-center randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies will be able to answer this question with more certainty and a higher level of evidence.
Level III.
开放性骨折被视为骨科急症,传统上需在受伤后6小时内进行外科清创以预防感染。然而,这一宣称的“6小时规则”是随意的,并非基于严格的科学证据。我们研究的目的是系统回顾比较小儿开放性骨折延迟(受伤时间>6小时)与早期(受伤时间<6小时)外科清创的文献。
我们检索了1946年至2013年期间的多个数据库,查找评估小儿开放性骨折延迟和早期外科清创的任何观察性或实验性研究。我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,汇总比值比,以比较接受延迟与早期外科清创儿童的感染率。我们还调查了小儿上肢和下肢开放性骨折的感染率。提取了描述性、定量和定性数据。
在识别出的12篇文章中,三项研究(回顾性队列研究)符合荟萃分析条件,共纳入714例开放性骨折。延迟与早期外科清创之间感染的汇总比值比(OR = 0.79)有利于延迟外科清创,但无统计学意义(95%CI 0.32, 1.99;p = 0.38,I² = 0%)。根据纳入研究中的时间阈值,上肢和下肢小儿开放性骨折的感染率无显著差异(OR = 0.72,95%CI 0.29, 1.82;p = 0.40,I² = 0%)。
目前累积证据未表明小儿开放性骨折延迟外科清创与较高感染率之间存在关联。然而,儿童开放性骨折的初始快速外科清创仍应作为常规。因此,多中心随机对照试验或前瞻性队列研究将能够更确定地回答这个问题,并提供更高水平的证据。
三级。