Suppr超能文献

哺乳期乳房胀痛的治疗方法。

Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation.

作者信息

Zakarija-Grkovic Irena, Stewart Fiona

机构信息

Cochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

Cochrane Children and Families Network, c/o Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 18;9(9):CD006946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006946.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engorgement is the overfilling of breasts with milk, often occurring in the early days postpartum. It results in swollen, hard, painful breasts and may lead to premature cessation of breastfeeding, decreased milk production, cracked nipples and mastitis. Various treatments have been studied but little consistent evidence has been found on effective interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of different treatments for engorgement in breastfeeding women.

SEARCH METHODS

On 2 October 2019, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All types of randomised controlled trials and all forms of treatment for breast engorgement were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility, extracted data, conducted 'Risk of bias' assessment and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

For this udpate, we included 21 studies (2170 women randomised) conducted in a variety of settings. Six studies used individual breasts as the unit of analysis. Trials examined a range of interventions: cabbage leaves, various herbal compresses (ginger, cactus and aloe, hollyhock), massage (manual, electromechanical, Oketani), acupuncture, ultrasound, acupressure, scraping therapy, cold packs, and medical treatments (serrapeptase, protease, oxytocin). Due to heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible and data were reported from single trials. Certainty of evidence was downgraded for limitations in study design, imprecision and for inconsistency of effects. We report here findings from key comparisons. Cabbage leaf treatments compared to control For breast pain, cold cabbage leaves may be more effective than routine care (mean difference (MD) -1.03 points on 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS), 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.53 to -0.53; 152 women; very low-certainty evidence) or cold gel packs (-0.63 VAS points, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.17; 152 women; very low-certainty evidence), although the evidence is very uncertain. We are uncertain about cold cabbage leaves compared to room temperature cabbage leaves, room temperature cabbage leaves compared to hot water bag, and cabbage leaf extract cream compared to placebo cream because the CIs were wide and included no effect. For breast hardness, cold cabbage leaves may be more effective than routine care (MD -0.58 VAS points, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.34; 152 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about cold cabbage leaves compared to cold gel packs because the CIs were wide and included no effect. For breast engorgement, room temperature cabbage leaves may be more effective than a hot water bag (MD -1.16 points on 1-6 scale, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.96; 63 women; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about cabbage leaf extract cream compared to placebo cream because the CIs were wide and included no effect. More women were satisfied with cold cabbage leaves than with routine care (risk ratio (RR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.64; 152 women; low certainty), or with cold gel packs (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.38; 152 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain if women breastfeed longer following treatment with cold cabbage leaves than routine care because CIs were wide and included no effect. Breast swelling and adverse events were not reported. Compress treatments compared to control For breast pain, herbal compress may be more effective than hot compress (MD -1.80 VAS points, 95% CI -2.07 to -1.53; 500 women; low-certainty evidence). Massage therapy plus cactus and aloe compress may be more effective than massage therapy alone (MD -1.27 VAS points, 95% CI -1.75 to -0.79; 100 women; low-certainty evidence). In a comparison of cactus and aloe compress to massage therapy, the CIs were wide and included no effect. For breast hardness, cactus and aloe cold compress may be more effective than massage (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.87; 102 women; low-certainty evidence). Massage plus cactus and aloe cold compress may reduce the risk of breast hardness compared to massage alone (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.58; 100 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effects of compress treatments on breast engorgement and cessation of breastfeeding because the certainty of evidence was very low. Among women receiving herbal compress treatment, 2/250 experienced skin irritation compared to 0/250 in the hot compress group (moderate-certainty evidence). Breast swelling and women's opinion of treatment were not reported. Medical treatments compared to placebo Protease may reduce breast pain (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04, 0.74; low-certainty evidence; 59 women) and breast swelling (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.79; 59 women; low-certainty evidence), whereas serrapeptase may reduce the risk of engorgement compared to placebo (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.88; 59 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain if serrapeptase reduces breast pain or swelling, or if oxytocin reduces breast engorgement compared to placebo, because the CIs were wide and included no effect. No women experienced adverse events in any of the groups receiving serrapeptase, protease or placebo (low-certainty evidence). Breast induration/hardness, women's opinion of treatment and breastfeeding cessation were not reported. Cold gel packs compared to control For breast pain, we are uncertain about the effectiveness of cold gel packs compared to control treatments because the certainty of evidence was very low. For breast hardness, cold gel packs may be more effective than routine care (MD -0.34 points on 1-6 scale, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.08; 151 women; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if women breastfeed longer following cold gel pack treatment compared to routine care because the CIs were wide and included no effect. There may be little difference in women's satisfaction with cold gel packs compared to routine care (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.40; 151 women; low-certainty evidence). Breast swelling, engorgement and adverse events were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although some interventions may be promising for the treatment of breast engorgement, such as cabbage leaves, cold gel packs, herbal compresses, and massage, the certainty of evidence is low and we cannot draw robust conclusions about their true effects. Future trials should aim to include larger sample sizes, using women - not individual breasts - as units of analysis.

摘要

背景

乳汁充盈是指乳房中乳汁过度充盈,常在产后早期出现。它会导致乳房肿胀、变硬、疼痛,并可能导致母乳喂养提前终止、乳汁分泌减少、乳头皲裂和乳腺炎。已经对各种治疗方法进行了研究,但关于有效干预措施的一致证据很少。

目的

确定不同治疗方法对哺乳期妇女乳汁充盈的有效性和安全性。

检索方法

2019年10月2日,我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)以及检索到的研究的参考文献列表。

选择标准

所有类型的随机对照试验以及所有形式的乳房充盈治疗均符合条件。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估试验的合格性、提取数据、进行“偏倚风险”评估并使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。

主要结果

在本次更新中,我们纳入了在各种环境中进行的21项研究(2170名女性被随机分组)。六项研究将单个乳房作为分析单位。试验考察了一系列干预措施:卷心菜叶、各种草药热敷(生姜、仙人掌和芦荟、蜀葵)、按摩(手动、电动、冈谷式)、针灸、超声、指压、刮痧疗法、冷敷袋以及药物治疗(舍雷肽酶、蛋白酶、催产素)。由于存在异质性,无法进行荟萃分析,数据由单项试验报告。由于研究设计存在局限性、结果不精确以及效应不一致,证据的确定性被降低。我们在此报告关键比较的结果。与对照组相比,卷心菜叶治疗 对于乳房疼痛,冷卷心菜叶可能比常规护理更有效(在0 - 10视觉模拟量表(VAS)上平均差值(MD)为 - 1.03分,95%置信区间(CI)为 - 1.53至 - 0.53;152名女性;极低确定性证据)或比冷敷凝胶袋更有效( - 0.63 VAS分,95% CI为 - 1.09至 - 0.17;152名女性;极低确定性证据),尽管证据非常不确定。与室温卷心菜叶相比、室温卷心菜叶与热水袋相比以及卷心菜叶提取物乳膏与安慰剂乳膏相比,我们不确定冷卷心菜叶的效果,因为置信区间很宽且包含无效应。对于乳房硬度,冷卷心菜叶可能比常规护理更有效(MD - 0.58 VAS分,95% CI为 - 0.82至 - 0.34;152名女性;低确定性证据)。与冷敷凝胶袋相比,我们不确定冷卷心菜叶的效果,因为置信区间很宽且包含无效应。对于乳房充盈,室温卷心菜叶可能比热水袋更有效(在1 - 6量表上MD为 - 1.16分,95% CI为 - 1.36至 - 0.96;63名女性;极低确定性证据)。与安慰剂乳膏相比,我们不确定卷心菜叶提取物乳膏的效果,因为置信区间很宽且包含无效应。更多女性对冷卷心菜叶治疗的满意度高于常规护理(风险比(RR)为1.42,95% CI为1.22至1.64;152名女性;低确定性),或高于冷敷凝胶袋(RR为1.23,95% CI为1.10至1.38;152名女性;低确定性证据)。我们不确定冷卷心菜叶治疗后女性母乳喂养时间是否比常规护理更长,因为置信区间很宽且包含无效应。未报告乳房肿胀和不良事件。与对照组相比,热敷治疗 对于乳房疼痛而言,草药热敷可能比热敷更有效(MD - 1.80 VAS分,95% CI为 - 2.07至 - 1.53;500名女性;低确定性证据)。按摩疗法加仙人掌和芦荟热敷可能比单独的按摩疗法更有效(MD - 于1.27 VAS分,95% CI为 - 1.75至 - 0.79;100名女性;低确定性证据)。在仙人掌和芦荟热敷与按摩疗法的比较中,置信区间很宽且包含无效应。对于乳房硬度,仙人掌和芦荟冷敷可能比按摩更有效(RR为0.66,95% CI为0.51至0.87;102名女性;低确定性证据)。与单独按摩相比,按摩加仙人掌和芦荟冷敷可能降低乳房硬度的风险(RR为分别为0.38,95% CI为0.25至0.58;100名女性;低确定性证据)。对于乳房充盈和母乳喂养终止,我们不确定热敷治疗的效果,因为证据的确定性非常低。在接受草药热敷治疗的女性中,2/250出现皮肤刺激,而热敷组为0/250(中等确定性证据)。未报告乳房肿胀和女性对治疗的看法。与安慰剂相比,药物治疗 蛋白酶可能减轻乳房疼痛(RR为0.17,95% CI为0.04,0.74;低确定性证据;59名女性)和乳房肿胀(RR为0.34,95% CI为0.15至0.79;59名女性;低确定性证据),而舍雷肽酶与安慰剂相比可能降低乳汁充盈的风险(RR为0.36,95% CI为0.14至0.用88;59名女性;低确定性证据)。我们不确定舍雷肽酶是否能减轻乳房疼痛或肿胀,以及催产素与安慰剂相比是否能减轻乳房充盈,因为置信区间很宽且包含无效应。在接受舍雷肽酶、蛋白酶或安慰剂治疗的任何组中,均无女性出现不良事件(低确定性证据)。未报告乳房硬结/硬度、女性对治疗的看法和母乳喂养终止情况。与对照组相比,冷敷凝胶袋 对于乳房疼痛,由于证据的确定性非常低,我们不确定冷敷凝胶袋与对照治疗相比的有效性。对于乳房硬度,冷敷凝胶袋可能比常规护理更有效(在1 - 6量表上MD为 - 0.34分,95% CI为 - 0.60至 - 0.08;151名女性;低确定性证据)。不确定冷敷凝胶袋治疗后女性母乳喂养时间是否比常规护理更长,因为置信区间很宽且包含无效应。与常规护理相比,女性对冷敷凝胶袋治疗的满意度可能差异不大(RR为1.17,95% CI为0.97至1.40;151名女性;低确定性证据)。未报告乳房肿胀、乳汁充盈和不良事件。

作者结论

尽管一些干预措施可能对治疗乳房充盈有前景,如卷心菜叶、冷敷凝胶袋、草药热敷和按摩,但证据的确定性较低,我们无法就其真实效果得出有力结论。未来的试验应旨在纳入更大的样本量,以女性而非单个乳房作为分析单位。

相似文献

1
Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation.哺乳期乳房胀痛的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 18;9(9):CD006946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006946.pub4.
2
Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation.哺乳期乳房胀痛的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD006946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006946.pub3.
3
Interventions for preventing mastitis after childbirth.产后乳腺炎的预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 29;9(9):CD007239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007239.pub4.
4
Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation.哺乳期乳房胀痛的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD006946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006946.pub2.
5
Local cooling for relieving pain from perineal trauma sustained during childbirth.局部冷敷缓解分娩时会阴创伤所致疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 9;10(10):CD006304. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006304.pub4.
6
Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain.剖宫产术后疼痛的补充和替代疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 1;9(9):CD011216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011216.pub2.
10
Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour.针灸或指压法用于分娩时的疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 7;2(2):CD009232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation.哺乳期乳房胀痛的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD006946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006946.pub3.
4
ABM Clinical Protocol #20: Engorgement, Revised 2016.ABM临床方案#20:乳汁充盈,2016年修订版。
Breastfeed Med. 2016 May;11(4):159-63. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.29008.pjb. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验